Natural history collections recapitulate 200 years of faunal change.
Crustacea
Echinodermata
Mollusca
biodiversity
collections
marine invertebrates
Journal
Royal Society open science
ISSN: 2054-5703
Titre abrégé: R Soc Open Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101647528
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Apr 2021
14 Apr 2021
Historique:
entrez:
17
5
2021
pubmed:
18
5
2021
medline:
18
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Changing species assemblages represent major challenges to ecosystems around the world. Retracing these changes is limited by our knowledge of past biodiversity. Natural history collections represent archives of biodiversity and are therefore an unparalleled source to study biodiversity changes. In the present study, we tested the value of natural history collections for reconstructing changes in the abundance and presence of species over time. In total, we scrutinized 17 080 quality-checked records for 242 epibenthic invertebrate species from the North and Baltic Seas collected throughout the last 200 years. Our approaches identified eight previously reported species introductions, 10 range expansions, six of which are new to science, as well as the long-term decline of 51 marine invertebrate species. The cross-validation of our results with published accounts of endangered species and neozoa of the area confirmed the results for two of the approaches for 49 to 55% of the identified species, and contradicted our results for 9 to 10%. The results based on relative record trends were less validated. We conclude that, with the proper approaches, natural history collections are an unmatched resource for recovering early species introductions and declines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33996123
doi: 10.1098/rsos.201983
pii: rsos201983
pmc: PMC8059531
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5365214']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
201983Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Références
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1783-6
pubmed: 15486254
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Oct;117(4):191-2
pubmed: 27553454
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50346
pubmed: 23185605
Mol Ecol. 2013 Dec;22(24):6018-32
pubmed: 24118668
Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Nov;11(6):1082-92
pubmed: 21791033
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Feb 17;1(3):67
pubmed: 28812743
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Dec;22(12):634-42
pubmed: 17988758
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Sep;29(9):2241-51
pubmed: 22427706
Curr Biol. 2014 Dec 1;24(23):2845-9
pubmed: 25454786
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0224249
pubmed: 31648244
Nature. 2011 Jul 13;475(7357):493-6
pubmed: 21753753
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 22;116(43):21602-21608
pubmed: 31591236
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 11;108(2):662-7
pubmed: 21199943
Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1621-3
pubmed: 15947186
PLoS Biol. 2018 Jul 16;16(7):e2006125
pubmed: 30011273
Mol Ecol. 2016 Feb;25(4):864-81
pubmed: 26757135
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 7;276(1676):4095-103
pubmed: 19740882
BMC Evol Biol. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):94
pubmed: 29907080
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Nov;24(11):625-33
pubmed: 19683829
Curr Biol. 2011 Nov 8;21(21):1828-32
pubmed: 22036178
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 May;89(2):484-92
pubmed: 24251767
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 25;10(1):3358
pubmed: 32098973
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Nov 1;34(11):2893-2907
pubmed: 28962023