Evaluating the morphology of the degradation layer of pure magnesium

3D imaging Magnesium degradation Porosity Transmission X-ray microscopy

Journal

Bioactive materials
ISSN: 2452-199X
Titre abrégé: Bioact Mater
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101685294

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 22 01 2021
revised: 20 03 2021
accepted: 07 04 2021
entrez: 17 5 2021
pubmed: 18 5 2021
medline: 18 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Magnesium is attractive for the application as a temporary bone implant due to its inherent biodegradability, non-toxicity and suitable mechanical properties. The degradation process of magnesium in physiological environments is complex and is thought to be a diffusion-limited transport problem. We use a multi-scale imaging approach using micro computed tomography and transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) at resolutions below 40 nm. Thus, we are able to evaluate the nanoporosity of the degradation layer and infer its impact on the degradation process of pure magnesium in two physiological solutions. Magnesium samples were degraded in simulated body fluid (SBF) or Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for one to four weeks. TXM reveals the three-dimensional interconnected pore network within the degradation layer for both solutions. The pore network morphology and degradation layer composition are similar for all samples. By contrast, the degradation layer thickness in samples degraded in SBF was significantly higher and more inhomogeneous than in DMEM+10%FBS. Distinct features could be observed within the degradation layer of samples degraded in SBF, suggesting the formation of microgalvanic cells, which are not present in samples degraded in DMEM+10%FBS. The results suggest that the nanoporosity of the degradation layer and the resulting ion diffusion processes therein have a limited influence on the overall degradation process. This indicates that the influence of organic components on the dampening of the degradation rate by the suppression of microgalvanic degradation is much greater in the present study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33997513
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.009
pii: S2452-199X(21)00175-4
pmc: PMC8111030
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

4368-4376

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Biomed Opt Express. 2020 Sep 10;11(10):5506-5517
pubmed: 33149967
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Jun;63:341-51
pubmed: 27040228
J Microsc. 2017 Jul;267(1):98-106
pubmed: 28419456
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2014 Sep;21(Pt 5):1188-93
pubmed: 25178011
Biomaterials. 2006 May;27(15):2907-15
pubmed: 16448693
Faraday Discuss. 2015;180:347-60
pubmed: 25905976
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Bone. 2010 Dec;47(6):1076-9
pubmed: 20817052
Acta Biomater. 2011 Jun;7(6):2704-15
pubmed: 21382530
Opt Lett. 2014 Mar 15;39(6):1601-4
pubmed: 24690848
Biomaterials. 1998 Apr-May;19(7-9):637-41
pubmed: 9663735
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 Jan 14;18(2):1279-91
pubmed: 26660298
Materials (Basel). 2017 Jun 29;10(7):
pubmed: 28773085
Bioact Mater. 2018 Feb 14;3(2):174-185
pubmed: 29744455
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2020 Sep 1;27(Pt 5):1339-1346
pubmed: 32876609
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Jan 1;58:817-25
pubmed: 26478376
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 May;62:68-78
pubmed: 26952399
Biomed Mater. 2009 Dec;4(6):065011
pubmed: 19966381
Bioinformatics. 2017 Aug 1;33(15):2424-2426
pubmed: 28369169
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 May 1;65(2):188-95
pubmed: 12734811
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Apr 1;61:865-74
pubmed: 26838918
Microsc Res Tech. 2011 Jul;74(7):671-81
pubmed: 20734414
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 04;12(21):
pubmed: 31690019
Biomaterials. 2009 Apr;30(12):2175-9
pubmed: 19176246
Adv Mater. 2019 Oct;31(42):e1903080
pubmed: 31486178
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2017 Feb;16(1):227-238
pubmed: 27502687

Auteurs

Berit Zeller-Plumhoff (B)

Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon GmbH, Institute of Metallic Biomaterials, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.

Daniel Laipple (D)

Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon GmbH, Research Reactor, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.

Hanna Slominska (H)

Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon GmbH, Institute of Metallic Biomaterials, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.

Kamila Iskhakova (K)

Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon GmbH, Institute of Metallic Biomaterials, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.

Elena Longo (E)

Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon GmbH, Institute of Materials Physics, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.

Alexander Hermann (A)

Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon GmbH, Institute of Materials Systems Modelling, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.

Silja Flenner (S)

Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon GmbH, Institute of Materials Physics, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.

Imke Greving (I)

Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon GmbH, Institute of Materials Physics, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.

Malte Storm (M)

Diamond Light Source Ltd., Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.

Regine Willumeit-Römer (R)

Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon GmbH, Institute of Metallic Biomaterials, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.

Classifications MeSH