A Prospective Randomised Study to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy of Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy Under General Anaesthesia.
Breast cancer
modified radical mastectomy
serratus anterior plane block
Journal
Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation
ISSN: 2667-677X
Titre abrégé: Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101680817
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
24
09
2019
accepted:
27
01
2020
entrez:
17
5
2021
pubmed:
18
5
2021
medline:
18
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and often requires surgery for the removal of the tumour. Uncontrolled pain after breast surgeries is a common problem. Serratus anterior plane (SAP) block is a recently designed technique to block the lateral cutaneous branches of the ventral rami of thoracic intercostal nerves and may cover the area of surgical dissection for modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of SAP block on the time to first rescue analgesic in the post-operative period in patients undergoing MRM. A randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial was conducted in a single teaching hospital. A total of 100 patients undergoing MRM were randomised in a 1:1 ratio into 2 groups: MRM under general anaesthesia (GA) alone (group G, n=50) or GA with SAP block (group S, n=50). Blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance at the level of the 5 The time to request of first rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in group S compared with group G (p=0.008). Median (interquartile range) for time to rescue analgesia in group S was 120 (60-300) min, whereas in group G, it was 60 (15-120) min. Post-operative pain scores and the number of patients requiring intra-operative additional fentanyl were significantly less in group S. No technique-related adverse events were observed. SAP block improved perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing MRM. CTRI/2017/11/010424. (http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/regtrial.php?modid=1&compid=19&EncHid=45912.14862).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33997841
doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2020.13
pii: tjar-49-2-124
pmc: PMC8098724
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
124-129Informations de copyright
© Copyright 2021 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):480-487
pubmed: 29932431
Anesth Analg. 2017 May;124(5):1697-1708
pubmed: 27828796
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5
pubmed: 22939099
Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;56(1):27-33
pubmed: 22529416
J Pain. 2006 Sep;7(9):626-34
pubmed: 16942948
Ann Surg. 1995 Nov;222(5):663-9
pubmed: 7487214
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Dec;21(6):704-10
pubmed: 18997521
Br J Surg. 2011 Feb;98(2):181-96
pubmed: 21104705
Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1107-13
pubmed: 23923989
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jul;125(1):294-302
pubmed: 28328756
Anaesthesia. 2001 Dec;56(12):1184-8
pubmed: 11736777
JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92
pubmed: 19903919
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jun;36(6):436-441
pubmed: 31021882
J R Soc Med. 2004 Dec;97(12):576-8
pubmed: 15574854
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:427-31
pubmed: 27687427
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 May;61(5):381-386
pubmed: 28584346
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):641-643
pubmed: 29794944
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:500-1
pubmed: 26603109