Size and duration of COVID-19 clusters go along with a high SARS-CoV-2 viral load: A spatio-temporal investigation in Vaud state, Switzerland.
Contagiousness
Coronavirus
GIS
Health geography
Infectious disease
Spacetime scan statistic
Journal
The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Sep 2021
15 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
21
02
2021
revised:
26
04
2021
accepted:
28
04
2021
pubmed:
18
5
2021
medline:
16
6
2021
entrez:
17
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To understand the geographical and temporal spread of SARS-CoV-2 during the first documented wave of infection in the state of Vaud, Switzerland, we analyzed clusters of positive cases using the precise residential location of 33,651 individuals tested (RT-PCR) between January 10 and June 30, 2020. We used a prospective Poisson space-time scan statistic (SaTScan) and a Modified Space-Time Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Application with Noise (MST-DBSCAN) to identify both space-time and transmission clusters, and estimated cluster duration, transmission behavior (emergence, growth, reduction, etc.) and relative risk. For each cluster, we computed the number of individuals, the median age of individuals and their viral load. Among the 1684 space-time clusters identified, 457 (27.1%) were significant (p ≤ 0.05), such that they harbored a higher relative risk of infection within the cluster than compared to regions outside the cluster. Clusters lasted a median of 11 days (IQR 7-13) and included a median of 12 individuals per cluster (IQR 5-20). The majority of significant clusters (n = 260; 56.9%) had at least one person with an extremely high viral load (>1 billion copies/ml). Those clusters were considerably larger (median of 17 infected individuals, p < 0.001) than clusters with individuals showing a viral load below 1 million copies/ml (median of three infected individuals). The highest viral loads were found in clusters with the lowest average age group considered in the investigation, while clusters with the highest average age had low to middle viral load. In 20 significant clusters, the viral load of the three first cases was below 100,000 copies/ml, suggesting that subjects with fewer than 100,000 copies/ml may still be contagious. Notably, the dynamics of transmission clusters made it possible to identify three diffusion zones, which predominantly differentiated between rural and urban areas, the latter being more prone to persistence and expansion, which may result in the emergence of new clusters nearby. The use of geographic information is key for public health decision makers in mitigating the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This study suggests that early localization of clusters may help implement targeted protective measures limiting the spread of the virus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34000545
pii: S0048-9697(21)02554-7
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147483
pmc: PMC8123367
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
147483Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):
pubmed: 31992387
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Aug;8(8):e1003-e1017
pubmed: 32553130
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;34:100354
pubmed: 32807396
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):e82
pubmed: 32240581
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Nov;26(11):1520-1524
pubmed: 32711057
J Travel Med. 2020 Mar 13;27(2):
pubmed: 32052846
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;8:626090
pubmed: 33614571
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):565-574
pubmed: 32213337
Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510):1465-1470
pubmed: 32680881
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 30;20(1):805
pubmed: 33126857
Future Microbiol. 2016;11(3):403-25
pubmed: 27028061
Microorganisms. 2021 Apr 10;9(4):
pubmed: 33920307
Int J Surg. 2020 Sep;81:122-129
pubmed: 32687873
PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 06;7(7):e1000304
pubmed: 20625549
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;96:461-463
pubmed: 32422375
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;26(6):1059-1066
pubmed: 32187007
Int J Infect Dis. 2011 Aug;15(8):e510-3
pubmed: 21737332
Euro Surveill. 2020 May;25(21):
pubmed: 32489175
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282150
pubmed: 36827328
Stat Med. 2011 May 10;30(10):1057-71
pubmed: 21484847
Int J Health Geogr. 2003 Feb 17;2(1):3
pubmed: 12633503
Pathog Dis. 2020 Nov 11;78(8):
pubmed: 33030200
Nature. 2005 Nov 17;438(7066):355-9
pubmed: 16292310
New Microbes New Infect. 2020 Nov;38:100820
pubmed: 33235799
Swiss J Econ Stat. 2020;156(1):11
pubmed: 32874959
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Aug;2(8):e393-e394
pubmed: 33328043
J Travel Med. 2020 Nov 9;27(7):
pubmed: 33051660
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 15;739:140033
pubmed: 32534320
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 8;117(36):22430-22435
pubmed: 32820074
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jun;96(6):1270-1273
pubmed: 28719289
Appl Geogr. 2020 May;118:102202
pubmed: 32287518
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Sep 13;11:594577
pubmed: 34589440
PLoS Med. 2012 Jan;9(1):e1001165
pubmed: 22303287
Int J Health Geogr. 2020 Mar 11;19(1):8
pubmed: 32160889
Microbes Infect. 2020 Nov - Dec;22(10):617-621
pubmed: 32911086
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):825-832
pubmed: 32277759
Int J Health Geogr. 2008 Nov 07;7:57
pubmed: 18992163