"Strong Teeth": an early-phase study to assess the feasibility of an oral health intervention delivered by dental teams to parents of young children.
Behaviour change
Caries
Paediatric
Parents
Prevention
Training
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 05 2021
17 05 2021
Historique:
received:
09
10
2020
accepted:
04
05
2021
entrez:
18
5
2021
pubmed:
19
5
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tooth decay (caries) is a significant health burden in young children. There is strong evidence for the benefits of establishing appropriate home-based oral health behaviours in early childhood. Dental teams are well placed to provide this information and there is clear advice on what oral health information should be given to parents. However, research has shown that there is limited guidance, training and resources on how dental teams should deliver this advice. "Strong Teeth" is a complex oral health intervention, using evidence-based resources and training underpinned by behaviour change psychology, to support behaviour change conversations in dental practice. This early phase evaluation aims to assess the feasibility of this intervention, prior to a full-scale trial. The study recruited 15 parents of children aged 0-2-years-old and 21 parents of children aged 3-5 years old, from five NHS dental practices across West Yorkshire. Participant demographics, self-reported brushing behaviours, dietary habits, a dental examination and three objective measures of toothbrushing were collected in a home-setting at baseline, then at 2-weeks and 2-months post-intervention. Recruitment, retention and intervention delivery were analysed as key process outcomes. Brushing habits were compared to national toothbrushing guidelines - the Delivering Better Oral Health toolkit (Public Health England). Strong Teeth was feasible to deliver in a General Dental Practice setting in 94% of cases. Feasibility of recruitment (37%) exceeded progression criterion, however retention of participants (75%) was below the progression criterion for the 0-2 age group. More than half of children recruited aged 3-5-years had caries experience (52%). Total compliance to toothbrushing guidance at baseline was low (28%) and increased after the intervention (52%), an improvement that was statistically significant. Dietary habits remained largely unchanged. Plaque scores significantly decreased in the 3-5-year-olds and toothbrushing duration increased in all age groups. "Strong Teeth" intervention delivery and data collection in the home setting was feasible. There was a positive indication of impact on reported toothbrushing behaviours. Some amendments to study design, particularly relating to the inclusion of the 0-2-year-old group, should be considered before progression to a full trial. Trial registration ISRCTN Register: ISRCTN10709150. Registered retrospectively 24/7/2019.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Tooth decay (caries) is a significant health burden in young children. There is strong evidence for the benefits of establishing appropriate home-based oral health behaviours in early childhood. Dental teams are well placed to provide this information and there is clear advice on what oral health information should be given to parents. However, research has shown that there is limited guidance, training and resources on how dental teams should deliver this advice. "Strong Teeth" is a complex oral health intervention, using evidence-based resources and training underpinned by behaviour change psychology, to support behaviour change conversations in dental practice. This early phase evaluation aims to assess the feasibility of this intervention, prior to a full-scale trial.
METHODS
The study recruited 15 parents of children aged 0-2-years-old and 21 parents of children aged 3-5 years old, from five NHS dental practices across West Yorkshire. Participant demographics, self-reported brushing behaviours, dietary habits, a dental examination and three objective measures of toothbrushing were collected in a home-setting at baseline, then at 2-weeks and 2-months post-intervention. Recruitment, retention and intervention delivery were analysed as key process outcomes. Brushing habits were compared to national toothbrushing guidelines - the Delivering Better Oral Health toolkit (Public Health England).
RESULTS
Strong Teeth was feasible to deliver in a General Dental Practice setting in 94% of cases. Feasibility of recruitment (37%) exceeded progression criterion, however retention of participants (75%) was below the progression criterion for the 0-2 age group. More than half of children recruited aged 3-5-years had caries experience (52%). Total compliance to toothbrushing guidance at baseline was low (28%) and increased after the intervention (52%), an improvement that was statistically significant. Dietary habits remained largely unchanged. Plaque scores significantly decreased in the 3-5-year-olds and toothbrushing duration increased in all age groups.
CONCLUSION
"Strong Teeth" intervention delivery and data collection in the home setting was feasible. There was a positive indication of impact on reported toothbrushing behaviours. Some amendments to study design, particularly relating to the inclusion of the 0-2-year-old group, should be considered before progression to a full trial. Trial registration ISRCTN Register: ISRCTN10709150. Registered retrospectively 24/7/2019.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34001087
doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01608-x
pii: 10.1186/s12903-021-01608-x
pmc: PMC8130402
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN10709150']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
267Références
J Behav Med. 2020 Feb;43(1):80-87
pubmed: 31154601
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Sep;25(5):327-38
pubmed: 26153526
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;44(4):313-30
pubmed: 26892435
Caries Res. 2005 Jan-Feb;39(1):27-33
pubmed: 15591731
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Dec 10;15:157
pubmed: 26654364
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239
pubmed: 27777223
Community Dent Health. 2019 Feb 25;36(1):22-26
pubmed: 30779499
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010 Jan;20(1):50-8
pubmed: 19840152
J Am Dent Assoc. 1964 Jan;68:7-13
pubmed: 14076341
Br Dent J. 2006 May 27;200(10):551-5
pubmed: 16732242
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Aug 13;5:100
pubmed: 31413863
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Apr 09;15:45
pubmed: 25888427
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(7):762-767
pubmed: 28571506
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD006540
pubmed: 22419315
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(7):741-746
pubmed: 28375708
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;29(4):239-46
pubmed: 11515636
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;47(1):71-77
pubmed: 30298932
Community Dent Health. 2007 Jun;24(2):82-7
pubmed: 17615822
Br J Nutr. 2009 Nov;102(9):1375-85
pubmed: 19505346
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12
pubmed: 15189396
J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Feb 01;7(1):e106-13
pubmed: 25810820
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):138
pubmed: 33743641
Community Dent Health. 2014 Jun;31(2):75-9
pubmed: 25055603
Community Dent Health. 2004 Mar;21(1 Suppl):121-30
pubmed: 15072481
J Dent Res. 2020 Feb;99(2):168-174
pubmed: 31944893
J Dent Res. 2015 May;94(5):650-8
pubmed: 25740856
Community Dent Health. 1997 Mar;14 Suppl 1:6-9
pubmed: 9114553
Implement Sci. 2016 May 06;11:61
pubmed: 27153832
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug;21(12):2242-2254
pubmed: 29607793