Influences of submerged plant collapse on diet composition, breadth, and overlap among four crane species at Poyang Lake, China.

Agricultural fields Food shortage Hooded crane Siberian crane Vallisneria tuber White-naped crane

Journal

Frontiers in zoology
ISSN: 1742-9994
Titre abrégé: Front Zool
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101231669

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 May 2021
Historique:
received: 01 04 2020
accepted: 29 04 2021
entrez: 18 5 2021
pubmed: 19 5 2021
medline: 19 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Interannual variation in resource abundance has become more unpredictable, and food shortages have increasingly occurred in the recent decades. However, compared to seasonal fluctuations in resource abundance, the influences of interannual variation in resource abundance on the dietary niches of consumers remain poorly understood. Poyang Lake, China, is a very important wintering ground for the globally endangered Siberian Crane (Leucogeranus leucogeranus), White-naped Crane (Grus vipio), and Hooded Crane (G. monacha), as well as the non-endangered Eurasian Crane (G. grus). Tubers of Vallisneria spp., the dominant submerged macrophytes at Poyang Lake, is an important food for cranes. Nevertheless, submerged macrophytes have experienced serious degradation recently. In this study, we used metabarcoding technology to explore the consequences of Vallisneria tuber collapse on the diet compositions, breadths, and overlaps of the four crane species based on fecal samples collected in winter 2017 (a year with tuber collapse) and winter 2018 (a year with high tuber abundance). Compared to previous studies, our study elucidates crane diets in an unprecedented level of detail. Vallisneria tubers was confirmed as an important food source of cranes. Surprisingly, the grassland plant Polygonum criopolitanum was also found to be an important food source in the feces of cranes. Agricultural fields were important foraging sites for Siberian Cranes, White-naped Cranes, and Hooded Cranes, providing foods that allowed them to survive in winters with natural food shortages. However, the three crane species preferred natural wetlands to agricultural fields when the abundance of natural foods was high. The abundance of Vallisneria tubers, and probably P. criopolitanum, greatly influenced the dietary compositions, breadths and overlap of cranes. During periods of preferred resource shortage, White-naped Cranes and Hooded Cranes widened their dietary niches, while Siberian Cranes maintained a stable niche width. The dietary niche overlap among crane species increased substantially under conditions of plentiful preferred food resources. Our study emphasizes the superior quality of natural wetlands compared to agricultural fields as foraging habitats for cranes. To provide safer and better foraging areas for cranes, it is urgent to restore the submerged plants at Poyang Lake. While high dietary niche overlap is often interpreted as intense interspecific competition, our study highlights the importance of taking food abundance into account.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Interannual variation in resource abundance has become more unpredictable, and food shortages have increasingly occurred in the recent decades. However, compared to seasonal fluctuations in resource abundance, the influences of interannual variation in resource abundance on the dietary niches of consumers remain poorly understood. Poyang Lake, China, is a very important wintering ground for the globally endangered Siberian Crane (Leucogeranus leucogeranus), White-naped Crane (Grus vipio), and Hooded Crane (G. monacha), as well as the non-endangered Eurasian Crane (G. grus). Tubers of Vallisneria spp., the dominant submerged macrophytes at Poyang Lake, is an important food for cranes. Nevertheless, submerged macrophytes have experienced serious degradation recently. In this study, we used metabarcoding technology to explore the consequences of Vallisneria tuber collapse on the diet compositions, breadths, and overlaps of the four crane species based on fecal samples collected in winter 2017 (a year with tuber collapse) and winter 2018 (a year with high tuber abundance).
RESULTS RESULTS
Compared to previous studies, our study elucidates crane diets in an unprecedented level of detail. Vallisneria tubers was confirmed as an important food source of cranes. Surprisingly, the grassland plant Polygonum criopolitanum was also found to be an important food source in the feces of cranes. Agricultural fields were important foraging sites for Siberian Cranes, White-naped Cranes, and Hooded Cranes, providing foods that allowed them to survive in winters with natural food shortages. However, the three crane species preferred natural wetlands to agricultural fields when the abundance of natural foods was high. The abundance of Vallisneria tubers, and probably P. criopolitanum, greatly influenced the dietary compositions, breadths and overlap of cranes. During periods of preferred resource shortage, White-naped Cranes and Hooded Cranes widened their dietary niches, while Siberian Cranes maintained a stable niche width. The dietary niche overlap among crane species increased substantially under conditions of plentiful preferred food resources.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our study emphasizes the superior quality of natural wetlands compared to agricultural fields as foraging habitats for cranes. To provide safer and better foraging areas for cranes, it is urgent to restore the submerged plants at Poyang Lake. While high dietary niche overlap is often interpreted as intense interspecific competition, our study highlights the importance of taking food abundance into account.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34001190
doi: 10.1186/s12983-021-00411-2
pii: 10.1186/s12983-021-00411-2
pmc: PMC8130136
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

24

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31772480
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province
ID : 20181BAB214007
Organisme : Funding Project of Jiangxi Academy of Sciences
ID : 2020-YGY-01

Références

Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):179-187
pubmed: 28215012
Front Zool. 2014 May 09;11:39
pubmed: 25093034
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 30;8(16):8547-8554
pubmed: 30250722
Mol Ecol. 2019 May;28(10):2694-2710
pubmed: 30933383
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):188-197
pubmed: 28215009
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63
pubmed: 21903629
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jun 17;7(15):5784-5796
pubmed: 28811883
Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 12;9(7):3868-3878
pubmed: 31015972
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Mar;14(2):306-23
pubmed: 24128180
J Anim Ecol. 2008 Sep;77(5):1020-9
pubmed: 18557956
Dokl Biol Sci. 2004 Jul-Aug;397:321-3
pubmed: 15508586
Curr Biol. 2017 May 22;27(10):R376-R377
pubmed: 28535385
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 Mar;15(2):250-61
pubmed: 25042073
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 27;10(4):
pubmed: 32230979
Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(8):1931-50
pubmed: 22171763
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(3):e14
pubmed: 17169982
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 18;8(6):e65843
pubmed: 23823943
Oecologia. 1980 May;45(2):190-196
pubmed: 28309529
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
pubmed: 20709691
Science. 1974 Jul 5;185(4145):27-39
pubmed: 17779277
Mol Ecol. 2009 May;18(9):2022-38
pubmed: 19317847
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 30;112(26):8019-24
pubmed: 26034267
Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Mar;11(2):236-44
pubmed: 21429129
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0115335
pubmed: 25635852
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Jan;9(1):51-60
pubmed: 21564566
Mol Ecol. 2019 Jan;28(2):391-406
pubmed: 29858539
Mol Ecol. 2014 Aug;23(15):3633-47
pubmed: 25187921
Mol Ecol. 2002 Apr;11(4):627-41
pubmed: 11972753
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 22;271(1541):875-82
pubmed: 15255108
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 03;8(12):e81174
pubmed: 24312532
Mol Ecol. 2015 Oct;24(20):5296-307
pubmed: 26369564
Oecologia. 2003 Aug;136(3):439-44
pubmed: 12802673
Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10(10):937-44
pubmed: 17845294
PeerJ. 2016 Apr 21;4:e1968
pubmed: 27123382
PeerJ. 2016 Aug 17;4:e2345
pubmed: 27602302
Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep 01;10(20):11055-11068
pubmed: 33144948
Oecologia. 1985 Apr;66(1):6-16
pubmed: 28310806
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 23;13(3):e0194796
pubmed: 29570741
Oecologia. 2006 Aug;149(1):44-51
pubmed: 16645855
Ecol Evol. 2013 Oct;3(12):4057-69
pubmed: 24324859
Ecol Evol. 2011 Dec;1(4):556-70
pubmed: 22393522

Auteurs

Jinjin Hou (J)

Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecosystem Change and Biodiversity, Center for Watershed Ecology, Institute of Life Science and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.

Lei Li (L)

Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecosystem Change and Biodiversity, Center for Watershed Ecology, Institute of Life Science and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
Jiangxi Poyang Lake Wetland Conservation and Restoration National Permanent Scientific Research Base, National Ecosystem Research Station of Jiangxi Poyang Lake Wetland, Nanchang, 330031, China.

Yafang Wang (Y)

Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecosystem Change and Biodiversity, Center for Watershed Ecology, Institute of Life Science and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.

Wenjuan Wang (W)

Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecosystem Change and Biodiversity, Center for Watershed Ecology, Institute of Life Science and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China. wangwj@ncu.edu.cn.
Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China. wangwj@ncu.edu.cn.
Jiangxi Poyang Lake Wetland Conservation and Restoration National Permanent Scientific Research Base, National Ecosystem Research Station of Jiangxi Poyang Lake Wetland, Nanchang, 330031, China. wangwj@ncu.edu.cn.

Huiying Zhan (H)

Jiangxi Poyang Lake National Nature Reserve Authority, Nanchang, 330038, China.

Nianhua Dai (N)

The Institute of Biology and Resources, Jiangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanchang, 330096, China.

Ping Lu (P)

The Institute of Biology and Resources, Jiangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanchang, 330096, China.

Classifications MeSH