End-of-life care in illicit drug users: mapping medication use.

hospital care pain symptoms and symptom management terminal care

Journal

BMJ supportive & palliative care
ISSN: 2045-4368
Titre abrégé: BMJ Support Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101565123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 16 01 2021
revised: 16 04 2021
accepted: 07 05 2021
pubmed: 19 5 2021
medline: 19 5 2021
entrez: 18 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

While clinical wisdom has long provided suggested guidance around caring for people who use illicit drugs (referred to as PWUD) at the end of life, there is striking paucity of empirical evidence underpinning these practices. Understanding medications and doses required to manage symptoms at the end of life is essential to provide effective end-of-life care for these patients. This study aimed to examine the type and dose of medications prescribed to hospitalised patients who use illicit drugs at the end of life, compared with patients without previous or current illicit drug use. A retrospective medical record review was conducted on consecutive patient deaths between 2012 and 2017 at a metropolitan hospital. PWUD were identified using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes for illicit drug use. Daily dosage of opioids, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics was documented for the last 3 days of life and compared with a matched comparator group. PWUD patients (n=55) received higher doses of opioids, midazolam and antipsychotics than comparator patients (n=55) for each day, significant for opioids in the last 24 hours (p=0.01). PWUD patients received a significantly higher total opioid dose (median=480.0 mg vs 255.0 mg) and midazolam (median=15.0 mg vs 5.0 mg) (both p<0.05). Rates of dose escalation did not differ. Results suggest that PWUD require greater doses of symptom-controlling medications, particularly opioids and midazolam, at the end of life but that rates of dose escalation do not differ greatly. This study provides a foundation for future research to inform clinical guidelines for this cohort of palliative care patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
While clinical wisdom has long provided suggested guidance around caring for people who use illicit drugs (referred to as PWUD) at the end of life, there is striking paucity of empirical evidence underpinning these practices. Understanding medications and doses required to manage symptoms at the end of life is essential to provide effective end-of-life care for these patients. This study aimed to examine the type and dose of medications prescribed to hospitalised patients who use illicit drugs at the end of life, compared with patients without previous or current illicit drug use.
METHOD METHODS
A retrospective medical record review was conducted on consecutive patient deaths between 2012 and 2017 at a metropolitan hospital. PWUD were identified using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes for illicit drug use. Daily dosage of opioids, benzodiazepines and antipsychotics was documented for the last 3 days of life and compared with a matched comparator group.
RESULTS RESULTS
PWUD patients (n=55) received higher doses of opioids, midazolam and antipsychotics than comparator patients (n=55) for each day, significant for opioids in the last 24 hours (p=0.01). PWUD patients received a significantly higher total opioid dose (median=480.0 mg vs 255.0 mg) and midazolam (median=15.0 mg vs 5.0 mg) (both p<0.05). Rates of dose escalation did not differ.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Results suggest that PWUD require greater doses of symptom-controlling medications, particularly opioids and midazolam, at the end of life but that rates of dose escalation do not differ greatly. This study provides a foundation for future research to inform clinical guidelines for this cohort of palliative care patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34001548
pii: bmjspcare-2021-002906
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002906
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e266-e269

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Phoebe Ulrick (P)

Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Stacey Panozzo (S)

Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia stacey.panozzo@svha.org.au.
Palliative Nexus, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Parkville Integrated Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

David Marco (D)

Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

Anna Collins (A)

Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Palliative Nexus, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Jennifer Philip (J)

Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Palliative Nexus, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Parkville Integrated Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Classifications MeSH