Mate Availability and Sexual Disgust.
Attractiveness
Evolution
Mate availability
Mating
Sexual disgust
Journal
Adaptive human behavior and physiology
ISSN: 2198-7335
Titre abrégé: Adapt Human Behav Physiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101643929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
05
02
2020
revised:
23
04
2021
accepted:
28
04
2021
pubmed:
19
5
2021
medline:
19
5
2021
entrez:
18
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
One of the factors that sexual disgust should be calibrated to is the size of the mating pool. This study tested this hypothesis by examining whether perceptions of mate availability explain variance in levels of sexual disgust towards potential mates. Participants ( Multilevel models revealed a negative association between sexual disgust towards potential mates and perceived mate availability-the opposite of what we predicted. We found support for our prediction that women had higher levels of sexual disgust than men, but only after addressing the confounding sex difference in target attractiveness. We also found the predicted negative association between target attractiveness and sexual disgust. Finally, as predicted, sexual disgust levels were more strongly related to potential mates' attractiveness in individuals who perceived there to be many available mates in their local environment. These findings generally bolster functional accounts of sexual disgust while highlighting the need for more evidence to ascertain the role of mate availability in the calibration of sexual disgust. Specifically, future research should examine the extent to which disgust levels may truncate mental representations of the mating pool instead of being calibrated by them.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34002123
doi: 10.1007/s40750-021-00168-2
pii: 168
pmc: PMC8116064
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
261-280Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of InterestsThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.