The Horyzons project: a randomized controlled trial of a novel online social therapy to maintain treatment effects from specialist first-episode psychosis services.
Horyzons
digital intervention
educational attainment
employment
first-episode psychosis
hospitalization
peer support
social functioning
use of emergency services
Journal
World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)
ISSN: 1723-8617
Titre abrégé: World Psychiatry
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101189643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
entrez:
18
5
2021
pubmed:
19
5
2021
medline:
19
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to determine whether, following two years of specialized support for first-episode psychosis, the addition of a new digital intervention (Horyzons) to treatment as usual (TAU) for 18 months was more effective than 18 months of TAU alone. We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Participants were people with first-episode psychosis (N=170), aged 16-27 years, in clinical remission and nearing discharge from a specialized service. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Horyzons plus TAU (N=86) or TAU alone (N=84) between October 2013 and January 2017. Horyzons is a novel, comprehensive digital platform merging: peer-to-peer social networking; theory-driven and evidence-informed therapeutic interventions targeting social functioning, vocational recovery and relapse prevention; expert clinician and vocational support; and peer support and moderation. TAU involved transfer to primary or tertiary community mental health services. The primary outcome was social functioning at 18 months as measured by the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). Forty-seven participants (55.5%) in the Horyzons plus TAU group logged on for at least 6 months, and 40 (47.0%) for at least 9 months. Social functioning remained high and stable in both groups from baseline to 18-month follow-up, with no evidence of significant between-group differences (PSP mean difference: -0.29, 95% CI: -4.20 to 3.63, p=0.77). Participants in the Horyzons group had a 5.5 times greater increase in their odds to find employment or enroll in education compared with those in TAU (odds ratio, OR=5.55, 95% CI: 1.09-28.23, p=0.04), with evidence of a dose-response effect. Moreover, participants in TAU were twice as likely to visit emergency services compared to those in the Horyzons group (39% vs. 19%; OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.86, p=0.03, number needed to treat, NNT=5). There was a non-significant trend for lower hospitalizations due to psychosis in the Horyzons group vs. TAU (13% vs. 27%; OR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.11-1.08, p=0.07, NNT=7). So, although we did not find a significant effect of Horyzons on social functioning compared with TAU, the intervention was effective in improving vocational or educational attainment, a core component of social recovery, and in reducing usage of hospital emergency services, a key aim of specialized first-episode psychosis services. Horyzons holds significant promise as an engaging and sustainable intervention to provide effective vocational and relapse prevention support for young people with first-episode psychosis beyond specialist services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34002511
doi: 10.1002/wps.20858
pmc: PMC8129860
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
233-243Informations de copyright
© 2021 World Psychiatric Association.
Références
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 02;6:15
pubmed: 25698988
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Dec;58:59-75
pubmed: 29042139
Schizophr Res. 2012 Aug;139(1-3):116-28
pubmed: 22658527
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Jun 30;143(1):99-108
pubmed: 16725210
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;5(4):360-5
pubmed: 21951752
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;214(2):76-82
pubmed: 30251616
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):849-64
pubmed: 20363063
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 13;22(8):e17155
pubmed: 32788151
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Nov 30;161(2):213-24
pubmed: 18848731
BMJ. 2015 Nov 11;351:h5627
pubmed: 26559241
Schizophr Bull. 2013 Mar;39(2):436-48
pubmed: 22130905
Schizophr Bull. 2011 May;37(3):619-30
pubmed: 19900962
Schizophr Res. 2011 Jul;129(2-3):111-5
pubmed: 21549566
Schizophr Bull. 1996;22(2):305-26
pubmed: 8782288
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;5(1):41-50
pubmed: 29242000
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;65(7):762-71
pubmed: 18606949
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;211(1):37-44
pubmed: 28385705
Behav Res Ther. 2003 Mar;41(3):317-32
pubmed: 12600402
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019 Jul;140(1):65-76
pubmed: 30963544
NPJ Schizophr. 2017 Sep 26;3(1):34
pubmed: 28951544
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Oct 29;4(10):e19887
pubmed: 33118945
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;15(2):335-343
pubmed: 32067415
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5
pubmed: 16367493
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Aug 30;228(3):803-7
pubmed: 26089018
BMJ. 2017 Jan 12;356:i6681
pubmed: 28082379
Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76
pubmed: 3616518
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 May;196(5):372-6
pubmed: 20435962
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e17570
pubmed: 32384056
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Nov;59(11):1338-42
pubmed: 18971413
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152
pubmed: 23151820
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 18;20(12):e12244
pubmed: 30563811
J Pers Assess. 1996 Feb;66(1):20-40
pubmed: 8576833
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e024104
pubmed: 30782893
Schizophr Bull. 2010 Sep;36(5):935-48
pubmed: 20462998
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Aug 20;44(5):1070-1080
pubmed: 29566206
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Dec;(22):39-44
pubmed: 8110442
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705-14
pubmed: 2035047
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
World Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;16(3):278-286
pubmed: 28941098
Schizophr Res. 2018 Dec;202:369-377
pubmed: 30031616