Coil volume embolization ratio for preventing recanalization after portal vein embolization.
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
entrez:
18
5
2021
pubmed:
19
5
2021
medline:
18
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the optimum volume embolization ratio (VER) for the prevention of recanalization after portal vein embolization (PVE) and the influence of recanalization on future liver remnant (FLR) function using technetium-99m galactosyl human serum albumin single-photon emission computed tomography (99mTc-GSA SPECT/CT) fusion imaging. We analyzed procedural data of 18 patients who underwent PVE from 2015 to 2018. A total of 29 portal branches were embolized (12 anterior branch, 11 posterior branch, 4 left branch, 2 right branch) with absolute ethanol and coils. Portal vein recanalization was evaluated three weeks after PVE by contrast-enhanced CT. We classified the treated portal branches as non-recanalized and recanalized. VER was compared between the groups. In addition, for each patient, we calculated and evaluated the ratio of FLR volume to total liver volume (volumetric %FLR), FLR count to total liver count on 99mTc-GSA SPECT/CT fusion imaging (functional %FLR), and functional-volumetric ratio (functional %FLR/ volumetric %FLR). Twenty-six portal branches showed no recanalization (non-recanalized group, n=26, 89.7%), while three portal branches showed recanalization (recanalized group, n=3, 10.3%). The median VER was 4.94% (3.12%-11.1%) in the non-recanalized group and 3.49% (2.76%-4.32%) in the recanalized group, which was significantly different between the groups (p = 0.045, Mann-Whitney U test). The median functional-volumetric ratio was 1.16 (1.03-1.50) in non-recanalized patients (n=15, 83.3%) and 1.01 (0.96-1.13) in recanalized patients (n=3, 16.7%), and it was significantly higher in the non-recanalized patients (p = 0.021, Mann-Whitney U test). The VER for preventing recanalization after PVE was approximately 5% (> 4.94%). 99mTc-GSA SPECT/CT fusion imaging revealed a decrease in FLR function due to recanalization after PVE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34003123
doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20043
pmc: PMC8136538
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
366-371Références
Ann Nucl Med. 2003 Feb;17(1):23-9
pubmed: 12691127
HPB Surg. 2016;2016:7637838
pubmed: 27418717
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Apr;21(4):235-8
pubmed: 24520049
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Sep;21(8):1523-31
pubmed: 11003290
Surgery. 2015 Jan;157(1):20-6
pubmed: 25482462
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):873-8
pubmed: 26721769
Eur Radiol. 2016 May;26(5):1378-86
pubmed: 26271621
Radiographics. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):450-461
pubmed: 29528826
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Oct;37(5):1251-8
pubmed: 24310828
Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Apr;36(4):285-294
pubmed: 29429141
Surgery. 1990 May;107(5):521-7
pubmed: 2333592
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Feb;96(2):541-6
pubmed: 11232703
Surgery. 2016 Jul;160(1):118-126
pubmed: 27059635
Surgery. 1997 Feb;121(2):135-41
pubmed: 9037224
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):789-797
pubmed: 28912030
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010 Sep;17(5):673-81
pubmed: 20703846
World J Surg. 2007 Aug;31(8):1643-51
pubmed: 17551779
Jpn J Radiol. 2017 Dec;35(12):748-754
pubmed: 29039109
J Nucl Med. 2010 May;51(5):742-52
pubmed: 20395336
J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;46(7):938-43
pubmed: 21523415
Neuroradiology. 2018 Nov;60(11):1141-1150
pubmed: 30143820
Ann Nucl Med. 2003 Feb;17(1):61-7
pubmed: 12691132
Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):625-30
pubmed: 15591428
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Feb;8(2):152-7
pubmed: 25564539