Updated Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: STEEP Version 2.0.
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 08 2021
20 08 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
19
5
2021
medline:
18
11
2021
entrez:
18
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria, established in 2007, provide standardized definitions of adjuvant breast cancer clinical trial end points. Given the evolution of breast cancer clinical trials and improvements in outcomes, a panel of experts reviewed the STEEP criteria to determine whether modifications are needed. We conducted systematic searches of ClinicalTrials.gov for adjuvant systemic and local-regional therapy trials for breast cancer to investigate if the primary end points reported met STEEP criteria. On the basis of common STEEP deviations, we performed a series of simulations to evaluate the effect of excluding non-breast cancer deaths and new nonbreast primary cancers from the invasive disease-free survival end point. Among 11 phase III breast cancer trials with primary efficacy end points, three had primary end points that followed STEEP criteria, four used STEEP definitions but not the corresponding end point names, and four used end points that were not included in the original STEEP manuscript. Simulation modeling demonstrated that inclusion of second nonbreast primary cancer can increase the probability of incorrect inferences, can decrease power to detect clinically relevant efficacy effects, and may mask differences in recurrence rates, especially when recurrence rates are low. We recommend an additional end point, invasive breast cancer-free survival, which includes all invasive disease-free survival events except second nonbreast primary cancers. This end point should be considered for trials in which the toxicities of agents are well-known and where the risk of second primary cancer is small. Additionally, we provide end point recommendations for local therapy trials, low-risk populations, noninferiority trials, and trials incorporating patient-reported outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34003702
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03613
pmc: PMC10166345
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2720-2731Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R37 CA214785
Pays : United States
Références
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):933-42
pubmed: 23932548
Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1802-1810
pubmed: 28791694
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;164(3):649-658
pubmed: 28508185
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):122-131
pubmed: 28581356
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 01;28(4):754-760
pubmed: 27993816
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):60-72
pubmed: 31806543
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):617-628
pubmed: 30516102
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Jul 1;112(7):698-707
pubmed: 31693129
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;37(10):799-808
pubmed: 30785826
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 10;33(32):3788-95
pubmed: 26416999
Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):1929-36
pubmed: 17896781
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1868-1875
pubmed: 30939096
JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926
pubmed: 28898379
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2127-32
pubmed: 17513820
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Aug;177(1):115-125
pubmed: 31152327
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Mar;51(4):451-463
pubmed: 25605582
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;21(19):4305-11
pubmed: 26041745
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;4(9):1199-1206
pubmed: 29852043
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 29;106(9):
pubmed: 25265940
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;38(3):203-213
pubmed: 31804894
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):266-73
pubmed: 25637340
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):e240-8
pubmed: 22652232
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 15;25(14):4248-4254
pubmed: 31036542
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 10;24(23):3726-34
pubmed: 16720680
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;34(28):3400-8
pubmed: 27325862
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 10;31(26):3197-204
pubmed: 23940225
Lancet. 2019 Dec 14;394(10215):2165-2172
pubmed: 31813635
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29
pubmed: 27557300
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):107-18
pubmed: 24881463
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 10;31(11):1398-404
pubmed: 23358971
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 8;372(2):134-41
pubmed: 25564897
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1303-10
pubmed: 25439688
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121
pubmed: 29860917
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;36(25):2621-2629
pubmed: 30040523
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2005-14
pubmed: 26412349
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1688-1700
pubmed: 29146401
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):734-42
pubmed: 22704583
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1034-42
pubmed: 26598744
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;35(23):2647-2655
pubmed: 28398846
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 1;31(19):2382-7
pubmed: 23690420
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):444-453
pubmed: 31821109
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):65-73
pubmed: 25422485
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 20;33(33):3938-44
pubmed: 26371148
Lancet. 2016 Feb 27;387(10021):849-56
pubmed: 26686957
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):58-64
pubmed: 25422488
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 1;32(22):2311-7
pubmed: 24934787
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):927-33
pubmed: 20863759
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):971-7
pubmed: 15342805
Lancet. 2017 Sep 9;390(10099):1048-1060
pubmed: 28779963
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):709-15
pubmed: 25605856
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;35(23):2639-2646
pubmed: 28661759
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):127-138
pubmed: 29158011
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):122-137
pubmed: 29863451