Anaphylaxis due to potato starch (possibly caused by percutaneous sensitization).
Anaphylaxis
Immunoblotting
Mass spectrometry
Percutaneous sensitization
Potato
Potato starch
Journal
Asia Pacific allergy
ISSN: 2233-8276
Titre abrégé: Asia Pac Allergy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101561954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
07
12
2020
accepted:
19
04
2021
entrez:
19
5
2021
pubmed:
20
5
2021
medline:
20
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An 8-year-old boy with poor control of atopic dermatitis could eat potato products such as French fries without restrictions until 21 months of age. However, he developed generalized urticaria after eating potato products at the same age. Therefore, potatoes were excluded from his diet; nevertheless, he continued to consume a very small amount of potato starch but was without symptoms until the age of 8 years. At this age, he developed anaphylaxis after consuming potato starch and required administration of intramuscular epinephrine. He tested positive for potato-specific immunoglobulin E, skin prick test, and basophil activation test. He developed severe eczema with dry skin and erosion. We later discovered that potato starch had been used for play clay at his nursery school. Although he discontinued using potato starch play clay, it remained present in his surroundings for 6 years. His potato allergy may have developed and continued to worsen as a result of making indirect contact with surfaces that had previously been exposed to the allergen. Two-dimensional Western blot analysis on potato starch revealed the presence of proteins binding to the immunoglobulin E of the patient. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis findings showed that 5 of the 6 protein bands had a similar molecular weight as that of potato proteins. Thus far, there are no reports of anaphylaxis due to potato starch. Children with atopic dermatitis or damaged skin may have sensitivity to potato starch and could develop anaphylaxis as noted in this case.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34007824
doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2021.11.e14
pmc: PMC8103007
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e14Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: KM is an endowed chair from Hoyu Co., Ltd. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Case Rep Dermatol. 2015 Aug 29;7(2):227-32
pubmed: 26464568
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Feb;123(2):417-23
pubmed: 19203660
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Sep;140(3):879-881.e7
pubmed: 28633942
Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Sep;47(9):1115-1124
pubmed: 28618090
Allergy. 2007 Jul;62(7):750-7
pubmed: 17573722
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Sep;110(3):524-35
pubmed: 12209106
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Jul;48(4):149-52
pubmed: 27425172
Clin Ter. 2015;166(1):12-5
pubmed: 25756253
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2010;152 Suppl 1:54-61
pubmed: 20523064
Allergy. 2001 Jul;56(7):619-26
pubmed: 11421919
Asia Pac Allergy. 2013 Jan;3(1):59-69
pubmed: 23404053
Contact Dermatitis. 2017 May;76(5):322-323
pubmed: 28386978
Allergol Int. 2016 Jan;65(1):82-7
pubmed: 26666490
N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 13;348(11):977-85
pubmed: 12637607