Impacts of California Proposition 47 on crime in Santa Monica, California.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
31
08
2020
accepted:
21
04
2021
entrez:
19
5
2021
pubmed:
20
5
2021
medline:
23
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We examine patterns of reported crime in Santa Monica, California before and after the passage of Proposition 47, a 2014 initiative that reclassified some non-violent felonies as misdemeanors. We also investigate impacts of the opening of four new light rail stations in 2016 and of increased community-based policing starting in late 2018. Our statistical analyses of reclassified crimes-larceny, fraud, possession of narcotics, forgery, receiving/possessing stolen property-and non-reclassified ones are based on publicly available reported crime data from 2006 to 2019. These analyses examine reported crime at various levels: city-wide, within eight neighborhoods, and within a 450-meter radius of the new transit stations. Monthly reported reclassified crimes increased city-wide by approximately 15% after enactment of Proposition 47, with a significant drop observed in late 2018. Downtown exhibited the largest overall surge. Reported non-reclassified crimes fell overall by approximately 9%. Areas surrounding two new train stations, including Downtown, saw significant increases in reported crime after train service began. While reported reclassified crimes increased after passage of Proposition 47, non-reclassified crimes, for the most part, decreased or stayed constant, suggesting that Proposition 47 may have impacted reported crime in Santa Monica. Reported crimes decreased in late 2018 concurrent with the adoption of new community-based policing measures. Follow-up studies needed to confirm long-term trends may be challenging due to the COVID-19 pandemic that drastically changed societal conditions. While our research detects changes in reported crime, it does not provide causative explanations. Our work, along with other considerations relevant to public utility, respect for human rights, and existence of socioeconomic disparities, may be useful to law enforcement and policymakers to assess the overall effect of Proposition 47.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34010285
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251199
pii: PONE-D-20-27332
pmc: PMC8133468
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0251199Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Public Health. 2018 Aug;108(8):987-993
pubmed: 29927653
Biometrics. 1946 Dec;2(6):110-4
pubmed: 20287815
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jun;230:9-19
pubmed: 30947103
Biometrika. 1947;34(1-2):28-35
pubmed: 20287819
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(4):547-52
pubmed: 23233477