Effects of cultivar, fruit presence and tree age on whole-plant dry matter partitioning in young olive trees.

Canopy to root ratio Dry matter partitioning Growth Harvest increment Harvest index Olea europaea

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
received: 26 01 2021
revised: 20 04 2021
accepted: 27 04 2021
entrez: 20 5 2021
pubmed: 21 5 2021
medline: 21 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study investigated the effects of cultivar, fruit presence and tree age on whole-plant partitioning of dry matter and energy equivalents (i.e., glucose equivalents). Young trees of two cultivars characterized by different vigor (i.e., Arbequina, low vigor and Frantoio, high vigor) were either completely deflowered from 2014 to 2017 or never, providing two contrasting levels of cumulated reproductive growth over the following 4 years. Total vegetative dry matter growth over the 4 years was assessed by destructive samplings (whole tree). Plant growth was inversely correlated to reproductive efforts, with Arbequina producing more and growing less than Frantoio. Deflowered trees grew similarly across cultivars, although deflowered Arbequina grew statistically less than deflowered Frantoio by the fourth year, due to abundant flower production. Total reproductive (flowers + fruit) and vegetative biomass production were the same for all cultivars and treatments. Arbequina had a greater distribution of dry matter in directly productive structures (current and one-year-old shoots) and in leaves. This allows it to increase the number of current and following-year production sites, and to save in the resources invested in non-productive sinks (roots, trunk and branches), thus liberating resources for reproductive growth. Greater investments in leaves allow it to intercept more light and thus to increase assimilation. Increased assimilation and increased partitioning towards productive structures, and decreased competition by non-productive structures might contribute to explain the greater early bearing attitude of this cultivar.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34013085
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06949
pii: S2405-8440(21)01052-5
pmc: PMC8113714
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e06949

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Tree Physiol. 2018 Sep 1;38(9):1278-1285
pubmed: 29452417
Tree Physiol. 2000 Jan;20(1):65-72
pubmed: 12651528
New Phytol. 2002 Sep;155(3):321-348
pubmed: 33873312
J Exp Bot. 1996 Aug;47 Spec No:1281-91
pubmed: 21245260
Tree Physiol. 2018 Sep 1;38(9):1267-1277
pubmed: 29474732
New Phytol. 1990 Nov;116(3):341-381
pubmed: 33874094
New Phytol. 2005 Jun;166(3):869-80
pubmed: 15869648
Tree Physiol. 1994 Apr;14(4):329-45
pubmed: 14967690
J Theor Biol. 1974 Jun;45(2):339-77
pubmed: 4367755

Auteurs

Andrea Paoletti (A)

Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy.

Adolfo Rosati (A)

Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria, Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via Nursina 2, 06049, Spoleto, PG, Italy.

Franco Famiani (F)

Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH