Importance of dashboard camera (Dash Cam) analysis in fatal vehicle-pedestrian crash reconstruction.
Dash Cam
Forensic pathology
Privacy right
Traffic crash
Journal
Forensic science, medicine, and pathology
ISSN: 1556-2891
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Med Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101236111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
accepted:
11
04
2021
pubmed:
21
5
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
20
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The reconstruction of dynamic of traffic injuries remains a challenge in forensic pathology and is often based on circumstantial data. Dash Cams are digital video recorders which can be located inside a vehicle and continuously record the view through the windscreen, thus providing objective evidence. Here we present the case of a traffic crash in which a pedestrian was hit by an articulated lorry. The analysis of a video recorded from a Dash Cam retrieved inside the vehicle during the death scene investigation (DSI) was crucial in the reconstruction of the manner of death. Indeed, the death, which was initially assumed to be accidental, was finally deemed as a suicide on the basis of the video recording, which showed an intentional and sudden rush of the victim to the middle of the roadway. Advantages and disadvantages of the use of Dash Cams will be discussed, focusing on the profound differences in the related national and international regulations. Based on the present case, in traffic crashes, the search for Dash Cams during the DSI may be recommended and the video recordings should be analyzed in the setting of a multidisciplinary and multimodal evaluation of the case, for a proper reconstruction of the facts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34013466
doi: 10.1007/s12024-021-00382-0
pii: 10.1007/s12024-021-00382-0
pmc: PMC8413177
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
379-387Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2017 May;32(3):
pubmed: 28657183
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 25;11:464
pubmed: 32523555
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:207-213
pubmed: 29598877
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014 Dec;10(4):623-6
pubmed: 25315842
J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Aug;107(3):508-19
pubmed: 9715585
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Mar;133(2):547-551
pubmed: 29876635
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 May;298:186-267
pubmed: 30925344
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Apr;285:77-85
pubmed: 29453008
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S278-85
pubmed: 24581913
J Forensic Sci. 2017 Nov;62(6):1671-1673
pubmed: 28295321
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 22;116(4):1201-1206
pubmed: 30617072
J Anal Toxicol. 2013 Sep;37(7):452-74
pubmed: 23934984
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Sep;130:117-124
pubmed: 28285708
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1988;15:149
pubmed: 12289232
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Sep;302:109914
pubmed: 31419592
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Nov 24;14(11):22113-27
pubmed: 25421737
J Forensic Sci. 2020 Jul;65(4):1155-1168
pubmed: 32134510
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S182-9
pubmed: 26436230
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Nov;244:e1-5
pubmed: 25194714
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):216-24
pubmed: 16781833
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012 Sep;8(3):208-17
pubmed: 21979427
Behav Sci Law. 2019 Nov;37(6):711-731
pubmed: 31965636
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Jul;312:110291
pubmed: 32353744