Comparison of 1-year surgical outcomes of combined cataract surgery and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) versus cataract surgery and iStent Inject.


Journal

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 22 12 2020
accepted: 16 02 2021
revised: 11 02 2021
pubmed: 21 5 2021
medline: 1 10 2021
entrez: 20 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and complication rates of phacoemulsification cataract surgery when combined with either gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) or iStent Inject. This is a retrospective case-control study to compare the surgical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification cataract surgery with either GATT (phaco-GATT) or iStent Inject (phaco-iStent). Both groups had at least 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome measures were IOP and number of glaucoma medications (NGMs) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intra- or postoperative complications within the first year of follow-up. Success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) < 21 mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction in IOP at 1 year regardless of the NGM. Each group included 37 patients. The median baseline IOP (24 vs 17) and NGM (3 vs 2) were higher in the phaco-GATT group (p < 0.001). Phaco-GATT achieved a 38% (p < 0.0001) reduction in IOP compared to 13.2% (p < 0.001) in the phaco-iStent group at 1-year follow-up. The reduction in IOP and NGM was significantly higher in the phaco-GATT group (p < 0.01). After adjusting for baseline IOP, the reduction in IOP at 12 months was still significantly higher in the phaco-GATT group (p = 0.042). At 1 year, 86.4% of patients in the phaco-GATT group met the success criteria compared to 35.1% in the phaco-iStent group. Safety outcomes were slightly favourable in the phaco-iStent group. Phaco-GATT and phaco-iStent showed a significant reduction in IOP and NGM, with phaco-GATT having a significantly higher reduction. Phaco-iStent appears to have a higher safety profile and is probably preferable in monocular patients and those with a high risk of bleeding.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34014384
doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05133-z
pii: 10.1007/s00417-021-05133-z
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3035-3044

Informations de copyright

© 2021. Crown.

Références

Bar-David L, Blumenthal EZ (2018) Evolution of glaucoma surgery in the last 25 years. Rambam Maimonides Med J 9:e0024. https://doi.org/10.5041/rmmj.10345
doi: 10.5041/rmmj.10345 pmcid: 6115476
Abu-Hassan DW, Acott TS, Kelley MJ (2014) The trabecular meshwork: a basic review of form and function. J Ocul Biol 2. https://doi.org/10.13188/2334-2838.1000017
Pillunat LE, Erb C, Jünemann AGM, Kimmich F (2017) Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS): a review of surgical procedures using stents. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1583–1600
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S135316
Van Tassel SH, Chen D (2019) An update on microinvasive glaucoma surgery concurrent with cataract extraction. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 7:224–232
doi: 10.1007/s40135-019-00220-1
Micro invasive glaucoma surgery by Glaukos. https://www.glaukos.com/healthcare-professionals/migs/ . Accessed 16 Nov 2020
Craven ER, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Giamporcaro JE (2012) Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1339–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025 pubmed: 22814041
Spiegel D, Wetzel W, Neuhann T et al (2009) Coexistent primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: Interim analysis of a trabecular micro-bypass stent and concurrent cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:393–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210901900311
doi: 10.1177/112067210901900311 pubmed: 19396784
Fea AM (2010) Phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification with micro-bypass stent implantation in primary open-angle glaucoma. Randomized double-masked clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:407–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.031
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.031 pubmed: 20202537
Fea AM, Consolandi G, Zola M et al (2015) Micro-bypass implantation for primary open-angle glaucoma combined with phacoemulsification: 4-year follow-up. J Ophthalmol 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/795357
Fernández-Barrientos Y, García-Feijoo J, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM et al (2010) Fluorophotometric study of the effect of the glaukos trabecular microbypass stent on aqueous humor dynamics. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:3327–3332. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-3972
doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3972
Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, Wells JM et al (2011) Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology 118:459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.007
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.007 pubmed: 20828829
Arriola-Villalobos P, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Díaz-Valle D et al (2013) Mid-term evaluation of the new Glaukos iStent with phacoemulsification in coexistent open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and cataract. Br J Ophthalmol 97:1250–1255. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302394
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302394 pubmed: 23603758
Belovay GW, Naqi A, Chan BJ et al (2012) Using multiple trabecular micro-bypass stents in cataract patients to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1911–1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.017
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.017 pubmed: 22980724
Patel I, de Klerk TA, Au L (2013) Manchester iStent study: early results from a prospective UK case series. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 41:648–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12098
doi: 10.1111/ceo.12098 pubmed: 23448425
Spiegel D, García-Feijoó J, García-Sánchez J, Lamielle H (2008) Coexistent primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: preliminary analysis of treatment by cataract surgery and the iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent. Adv Ther 25:453–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-008-0062-6
doi: 10.1007/s12325-008-0062-6 pubmed: 18594784
Clement CI, Howes F, Ioannidis AS et al (2019) One-year outcomes following implantation of second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents in conjunction with cataract surgery for various types of glaucoma or ocular hypertension: Multicenter, multi-surgeon study. Clin Ophthalmol 13:491–499. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S187272
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S187272 pubmed: 30936680 pmcid: 6420788
Neuhann R, Neuhann T (2020) Second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation: retrospective analysis after 12- and 24-month follow-up. Eye Vis 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-019-0169-7
Hengerer FH, Auffarth GU, Riffel C, Conrad-Hengerer I (2018) Prospective, non-randomized, 36-month study of second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents with phacoemulsification in eyes with various types of glaucoma. Ophthalmol Therapy 7:405–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-018-0152-8
doi: 10.1007/s40123-018-0152-8
Salimi A, Clement C, Shiu M, Harasymowycz P (2020) Second-generation trabecular micro-bypass (iStent inject) with cataract surgery in eyes with normal-tension glaucoma: one-year outcomes of a multi-centre study. Ophthalmol Therapy 9:585–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-020-00266-6
doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00266-6
Ferguson TJ, Dockter Z, Bleeker A et al (2020) iStent inject trabecular microbypass stent implantation with cataract extraction in open-angle glaucoma: early clinical experience. Eye Vis 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00194-3
Salby AM, Skalicky SE (2020) Combined iStent® inject trabecular micro-bypass and phacoemulsification in Australian patients with open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 14:985–993. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S241628
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S241628 pubmed: 32280193 pmcid: 7127814
Guedes RAP, Gravina DM, Lake JC et al (2019) One-year comparative evaluation of iStent or iStent inject implantation combined with cataract surgery in a single center. Adv Ther 36:2797–2810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01067-5
doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01067-5 pubmed: 31440981 pmcid: 6822971
Popovic M, Campos-Moller X, Saheb H, Ahmed IIK (2018) Efficacy and adverse event profile of the iStent and iStent inject trabecular micro-bypass for open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. J Curr Glaucoma Pract DVD 12:67–84. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1248
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1248
Manning D (2019) Real-world case series of iStent or iStent inject trabecular micro-bypass stents combined with cataract surgery. Ophthalmol Therapy 8:549–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-00208-x
doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-00208-x
Salimi A, Lapointe J, Harasymowycz P (2019) One-year outcomes of second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents (iStent Inject) implantation with cataract surgery in different glaucoma subtypes and severities. Ophthalmol Therapy 8:563–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-00214-z
doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-00214-z
Guedes RAP, Gravina DM, Lake JC et al (2019) Intermediate results of iStent or iStent inject implantation combined with cataract surgery in a real-world setting: a longitudinal retrospective study. Ophthalmol Therapy 8:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0166-x
doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-0166-x
Grover DS, Godfrey DG, Smith O et al (2014) Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy, Ab interno trabeculotomy: technique report and preliminary results. Ophthalmology 121:855–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.001 pubmed: 24412282
Grover DS, Smith O, Fellman RL et al (2018) Gonioscopy-Assisted transluminal trabeculotomy: an ab interno circumferential trabeculotomy: 24 months follow-up. J Glaucoma 27:393–401. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000956
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000956 pubmed: 29613978
Grover DS, Smith O, Fellman RL et al (2015) Gonioscopy assisted transluminal trabeculotomy: An ab interno circumferential trabeculotomy for the treatment of primary congenital glaucoma and juvenile open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 99:1092–1096. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306269
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306269 pubmed: 25677669
Aktas Z, Ucgul AY, Bektas C, Sahin Karamert S (2019) Surgical outcomes of prolene gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in patients with moderate to advanced open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 28:884–888. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001331
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001331 pubmed: 31385914
Rahmatnejad K, Pruzan NL, Amanullah S et al (2017) Surgical outcomes of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) in patients with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 26:1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000802
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000802 pubmed: 29035912
Grover DS, Godfrey DG, Smith O et al (2017) Outcomes of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) in eyes with prior incisional glaucoma surgery. J Glaucoma 26:41–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000564
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000564 pubmed: 27753757
Boese EA, Shah M (2019) Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) is an effective procedure for steroid-induced glaucoma. In: Journal of Glaucoma. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp 803–807
Sharkawi E, Lindegger DJ, Artes PH et al (2020) Outcomes of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma: 24-month follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-315954
Loayza-Gamboa W, Martel-Ramirez V, Inga-Condezo V et al (2020) Outcomes of combined prolene gonioscopy assisted transluminal trabeculotomy with phacoemulsification in open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 14:3009–3016. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S272298
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S272298 pubmed: 33061287 pmcid: 7537843
Baykara M, Poroy C, Erseven C (2019) Surgical outcomes of combined gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy and cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 67:505–508. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1007_18
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1007_18 pubmed: 30900583 pmcid: 6446620
Overview | Trabecular stent bypass microsurgery for open-angle glaucoma | Guidance | NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/IPG575 . Accessed 11 Feb 2021
Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR (1993) Clinical decisions in glaucoma. Mosby
Kerstetter JR, Brubaker RF, Wilson LJ, Kullerstrand LJ (1988) Prostaglandin F2α-1-isopropylester lowers intraocular pressure without decreasing aqueous humor flow. Am J Ophthalmol 105:30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(88)90117-1
doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90117-1 pubmed: 3337191
Shingleton BJ, Pasternack JJ, Hung JW, O’Donoghue MW (2006) Three and five year changes in intraocular pressures after clear corneal phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, and normal patients. J Glaucoma 15:494–498. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000212294.31411.92
doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212294.31411.92 pubmed: 17106361
Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW (2008) Long-term effects of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in normotensive and ocular hypertensive eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:735–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.045
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.045 pubmed: 18471626
Van Buskirk EM (1976) Changes in the facility of aqueous outflow induced by lens depression and intraocular pressure in excised human eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 82:736–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(76)90011-8
doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90011-8 pubmed: 998694
Shrivastava A, Singh K (2010) The effect of cataract extraction on intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 21:118–122
doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360ac3
iStent inject Trabecular Micro-Bypass System (Model G2-M-IS) – P170043 | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/recently-approved-devices/istent-inject-trabecular-micro-bypass-system-model-g2-m-p170043 . Accessed 16 Nov 2020
Sit AJ, McLaren JW (2011) Measurement of episcleral venous pressure. Exp Eye Res 93:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2011.05.003
doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.05.003 pubmed: 21621536
Phelps CD, Armaly MF (1978) Measurement of episcleral venous pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 85:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76662-0
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76662-0 pubmed: 619684
Battista SA, Lu Z, Hofmann S et al (2008) Reduction of the available area for aqueous humor outflow and increase in meshwork herniations into collector channels following acute IOP elevation in bovine eyes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:5346–5352. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-1707
doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1707
Johnstone MA, Grant WM (1973) Pressure-dependent changes in structures of the aqueous outflow system of human and monkey eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 75:365–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(73)91145-8
doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(73)91145-8 pubmed: 4633234
Allingham RR, De Kater AW, Ethier CR (1996) Schlemm’s canal and primary open angle glaucoma: Correlation between Schlemm’s canal dimensions and outflow facility. Exp Eye Res 62:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.1996.0012
doi: 10.1006/exer.1996.0012 pubmed: 8674505
Moses RA (1977) The effect of intraocular pressure on resistance to outflow. Surv Ophthalmol 22:88–100
doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(77)90088-1
Suson EB, Schultz RO (1969) Blood in Schlemm’s canal in glaucoma suspects: a study of the relationship between blood-filling pattern and outflow facility in ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol 81:808–812. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1969.00990010810010
doi: 10.1001/archopht.1969.00990010810010 pubmed: 5783752
Morphological changes in the distal outflow pathway of primary open angle glaucoma | IOVS | ARVO Journals. https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2333154 . Accessed 18 Nov 2020
Nesterov AP, Batmanov IE, Brikman VG (1978) State of the Schlemm’s canal at different levels of intraocular pressure. Vestn oftalmol:6–8
Zhang X, Beckmann L, Miller DA et al (2020) In vivo imaging of Schlemm’s canal and limbal vascular network in mouse using visible-light OCT. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 61. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.2.23

Auteurs

Hisham Hamze (H)

Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.

Abhijit Anand Mohite (AA)

New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton Rd, Heath Town, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK.

Pravin Pandey (P)

Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.

Velota C T Sung (VCT)

Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.

Imran Masood (I)

Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK. imranmasood@nhs.net.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH