Effectiveness and Safety of Magseed-localization for Excision of Breast Lesions: A Prospective, Phase IV Trial.
Journal
Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches
ISSN: 2691-3593
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101769928
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez:
21
5
2021
pubmed:
22
5
2021
medline:
22
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A prospective, phase IV study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Magseed to localize breast lesions requiring surgical excision. Since FDA approval in 2016, Magseed has been increasingly used to localize non-palpable lesions due to advantages over wires or radioactive seeds. This is the first prospective, post marketing trial of Magseed. From 1/2017-2/2018, 107 women with lesions requiring localization were enrolled at a single institution. Primary endpoint was Magseed retrieval rate. Secondary endpoints were adverse events, accuracy of placement, surgery duration and positive margin rate. Clinicians were surveyed for ease of use using a Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were performed to assess univariable associations with positive margins. There were 124 Magseeds placed including one marker in 93 subjects, 2 markers in 11 and 3 markers in 3. The majority of lesions were masses (63%) followed by calcifications (24%). All 124 Magseeds were placed within 10mm of the target lesion and surgically retrieved with median operative time of 15min (range 4-47). No device-related adverse events occurred. Of the 98 malignant lesions, 9 had positive margins and 7 of them underwent a second surgery for additional margins. On univariable analysis, age ≤ 50 (25.0% vs 6.4%, The Magseed system for localization of non-palpable lesions was effective and safe; all markers were successfully retrieved with margin-negative resections in 91%. This study supports use of Magseed for localization of breast lesions.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
A prospective, phase IV study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Magseed to localize breast lesions requiring surgical excision.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Since FDA approval in 2016, Magseed has been increasingly used to localize non-palpable lesions due to advantages over wires or radioactive seeds. This is the first prospective, post marketing trial of Magseed.
METHODS
METHODS
From 1/2017-2/2018, 107 women with lesions requiring localization were enrolled at a single institution. Primary endpoint was Magseed retrieval rate. Secondary endpoints were adverse events, accuracy of placement, surgery duration and positive margin rate. Clinicians were surveyed for ease of use using a Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were performed to assess univariable associations with positive margins.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were 124 Magseeds placed including one marker in 93 subjects, 2 markers in 11 and 3 markers in 3. The majority of lesions were masses (63%) followed by calcifications (24%). All 124 Magseeds were placed within 10mm of the target lesion and surgically retrieved with median operative time of 15min (range 4-47). No device-related adverse events occurred. Of the 98 malignant lesions, 9 had positive margins and 7 of them underwent a second surgery for additional margins. On univariable analysis, age ≤ 50 (25.0% vs 6.4%,
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The Magseed system for localization of non-palpable lesions was effective and safe; all markers were successfully retrieved with margin-negative resections in 91%. This study supports use of Magseed for localization of breast lesions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34017965
doi: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000008
pmc: PMC8130552
mid: NIHMS1614478
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):913-917
pubmed: 29446680
Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):29-35
pubmed: 28257326
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Oct;141(10):1324-1329
pubmed: 28968154
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1507-15
pubmed: 24516019
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;23(12):3801-3810
pubmed: 27527714
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018 Jan;27(1):155-165
pubmed: 29132558
Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20170740
pubmed: 29271240
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;(12):CD009206
pubmed: 26718728
Clin Radiol. 2019 Dec;74(12):974.e7-974.e11
pubmed: 31563293
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Oct;211(4):940-945
pubmed: 30085842
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jun;169(3):531-536
pubmed: 29453521
Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 May;55(3):591-603
pubmed: 28411682
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;45(11):2016-2021
pubmed: 31288944
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2932-2938
pubmed: 29947001