Survey of German medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: attitudes toward volunteering versus compulsory service and associated factors.

COVID-19 allocation of healthcare resources behavioural research health personnel

Journal

Journal of medical ethics
ISSN: 1473-4257
Titre abrégé: J Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513619

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 29 12 2020
revised: 29 04 2021
accepted: 04 05 2021
pubmed: 23 5 2021
medline: 25 8 2022
entrez: 22 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Due to the spread of COVID-19, a key challenge was to reduce potential staff shortages in the healthcare sector. Besides recruiting retired healthcare workers, medical students were considered to support this task. Commitment of medical students in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic was evaluated using an online survey, with particular focus on their burdens and anxieties. This survey was distributed to students within a 2-week period in April and May 2020. Ultimately, 1241 participants were included in the analysis. During the pandemic, 67.9% (65.3% to 70.5%) of the participants reported that they had volunteered. Furthermore, 88.9% (86.9% to 90.5%) stated that they were against compulsory recruitment in this context. Students who volunteered (committed students) had a significantly lower anxiety index than non-committed students. Additionally, students were more concerned about infecting other patients and relatives than themselves. Higher levels of anxiety were related to lower levels of commitment. A mandatory assignment during the pandemic was rejected by the students and does not seem to be necessary due to the large number of volunteers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34021060
pii: medethics-2020-107202
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107202
pmc: PMC8142677
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

630-636

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: JH is employee of Sandoz/Hexal. His occupation neither affected on the planning and execution of the study nor on the manuscript. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Lorenz Mihatsch (L)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany l.mihatsch@tum.de.

Mira von der Linde (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Münster, Munster, Germany.

Franziska Knolle (F)

Department of diagnostic and interventional Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Benjamin Luchting (B)

Department of Pain Medicine, Landsberg am Lech Clinic, Landsberg am Lech, Germany.

Konstantinos Dimitriadis (K)

Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Jens Heyn (J)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH