Refining Pheromone Lures for the Invasive Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Through Collaborative Trials in the United States and Europe.

attract and kill brown marmorated stink bug monitoring tools pheromone

Journal

Journal of economic entomology
ISSN: 1938-291X
Titre abrégé: J Econ Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985127R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 08 2021
Historique:
received: 02 02 2021
pubmed: 23 5 2021
medline: 27 10 2021
entrez: 22 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys, is native to Asia and has invaded North America and Europe inflicting serious agricultural damage to specialty and row crops. Tools to monitor the spread of H. halys include traps baited with the two-component aggregation pheromone (PHER), (3S,6S,7R,10S)-10,11-epoxy-1-bisabolen-3-ol and (3R,6S,7R,10S)-10,11-epoxy-1-bisabolen-3-ol, and pheromone synergist, methyl (2E,4E,6Z)-decatrienoate (MDT). Here, an international team of researchers conducted trials aimed at evaluating prototype commercial lures for H. halys to establish relative attractiveness of: 1) low and high loading rates of PHER and MDT for monitoring tools and attract and kill tactics; 2) polyethylene lure delivery substrates; and 3) the inclusion of ethyl (2E,4E,6Z)-decatrieonate (EDT), a compound that enhances captures when combined with PHER in lures. In general, PHER loading rate had a greater impact on overall trap captures compared with loading of MDT, but reductions in PHER loading and accompanying lower trap captures could be offset by increasing loading of MDT. As MDT is less expensive to produce, these findings enable reduced production costs. Traps baited with lures containing PHER and EDT resulted in numerically increased captures when EDT was loaded at a high rate, but captures were not significantly greater than those traps baited with lures containing standard PHER and MDT. Experimental polyethylene vial dispensers did not outperform standard lure dispensers; trap captures were significantly lower in most cases. Ultimately, these results will enable refinement of commercially available lures for H. halys to balance attraction and sensitivity with production cost.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34021561
pii: 6280811
doi: 10.1093/jee/toab088
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pheromones 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1666-1673

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Tracy C Leskey (TC)

USDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430-2771, USA.
Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5305, USA.

Heather Andrews (H)

North Willamette Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Aurora, OR, USA.

Angelika Bády (A)

Department of Entomology, Szent István University, Villányi út 29-43, H-1118 Budapest, Hungary.

Luca Benvenuto (L)

ERSA - Servizio Fitosanitario del Friuli Venezia Giulia, Via Sabbatini 5, 33050 Pozzuolo del Friuli, Italy.

Iris Bernardinelli (I)

ERSA - Servizio Fitosanitario del Friuli Venezia Giulia, Via Sabbatini 5, 33050 Pozzuolo del Friuli, Italy.

Brett Blaauw (B)

Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 3060, USA.

Pier Paolo Bortolotti (PP)

Consorzio Fitosanitario Provinciale Modena, Via Santi 14, 41123 Modena, Italy.

Lara Bosco (L)

University of Torino, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), Grugliasco (TO), Italy.

Emanuele Di Bella (E)

Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Amendola 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

George Hamilton (G)

Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA.

Thomas Kuhar (T)

Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.

Dalton Ludwick (D)

USDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430-2771, USA.
Texas A&M University AgriLife Extension, 10345 Highway 44, Corpus Christi, TX 78406, USA.

Lara Maistrello (L)

Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via G. Amendola 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Giorgio Malossini (G)

ERSA - Servizio Fitosanitario del Friuli Venezia Giulia, Via Sabbatini 5, 33050 Pozzuolo del Friuli, Italy.

Roberta Nannini (R)

Consorzio Fitosanitario Provinciale Modena, Via Santi 14, 41123 Modena, Italy.

Laura J Nixon (LJ)

USDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430-2771, USA.

Edison Pasqualini (E)

DISTAL, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 42, 40127 Bologna, Italy.

Michele Preti (M)

ASTRA Innovazione e Sviluppo Test Facility, Via Tebano 45, 48018 Faenza, Italy.

Brent D Short (BD)

USDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430-2771, USA.

Lori Spears (L)

Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5305, USA.

Luciana Tavella (L)

University of Torino, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), Grugliasco (TO), Italy.

Gábor Vétek (G)

Department of Entomology, Szent István University, Villányi út 29-43, H-1118 Budapest, Hungary.

Nik Wiman (N)

North Willamette Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Aurora, OR, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
Humans Emergency Service, Hospital Child Child, Preschool Infant
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell

Classifications MeSH