Comparing rates of mycobacterial clearance in sputum smear-negative and smear-positive adults living with HIV.
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections
/ drug therapy
Adult
Anti-HIV Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antitubercular Agents
/ therapeutic use
Bacterial Load
/ drug effects
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
Female
Follow-Up Studies
HIV
/ immunology
HIV Seropositivity
/ drug therapy
Humans
Male
Microscopy
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
/ genetics
Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
Prospective Studies
Sputum
/ microbiology
Treatment Outcome
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
/ drug therapy
Bacterial load
Culturability
HIV
MGIT
Smear microscopy
Tuberculosis
Xpert MTB/RIF
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 May 2021
22 May 2021
Historique:
received:
18
09
2020
accepted:
04
05
2021
entrez:
23
5
2021
pubmed:
24
5
2021
medline:
2
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in people living with HIV (PLH) frequently presents as sputum smear-negative. However, clinical trials of TB in adults often use smear-positive individuals to ensure measurable bacterial responses following initiation of treatment, thereby excluding HIV-infected patients from trials. In this prospective case cohort study, 118 HIV-seropositive TB patients were assessed prior to initiation of standard four-drug TB therapy and at several time points through 35 days. Sputum bacillary load, as a marker of treatment response, was determined serially by: smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF, liquid culture, and colony counts on agar medium. By all four measures, patients who were baseline smear-positive had higher bacterial loads than those presenting as smear-negative, until day 35. However, most smear-negative PLH had significant bacillary load at enrolment and their mycobacteria were cleared more rapidly than smear-positive patients. Smear-negative patients' decline in bacillary load, determined by colony counts, was linear to day 7 suggesting measurable bactericidal activity. Moreover, the decrease in bacterial counts was comparable to smear-positive individuals. Increasing cycle threshold values (Ct) on the Xpert assay in smear-positive patients to day 14 implied decreasing bacterial load. Our data suggest that smear-negative PLH can be included in clinical trials of novel treatment regimens as they contain sufficient viable bacteria, but allowances for late exclusions would have to be made in sample size estimations. We also show that increases in Ct in smear-positive patients to day 14 reflect treatment responses and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay could be used as biomarker for early treatment response.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in people living with HIV (PLH) frequently presents as sputum smear-negative. However, clinical trials of TB in adults often use smear-positive individuals to ensure measurable bacterial responses following initiation of treatment, thereby excluding HIV-infected patients from trials.
METHODS
METHODS
In this prospective case cohort study, 118 HIV-seropositive TB patients were assessed prior to initiation of standard four-drug TB therapy and at several time points through 35 days. Sputum bacillary load, as a marker of treatment response, was determined serially by: smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF, liquid culture, and colony counts on agar medium.
RESULTS
RESULTS
By all four measures, patients who were baseline smear-positive had higher bacterial loads than those presenting as smear-negative, until day 35. However, most smear-negative PLH had significant bacillary load at enrolment and their mycobacteria were cleared more rapidly than smear-positive patients. Smear-negative patients' decline in bacillary load, determined by colony counts, was linear to day 7 suggesting measurable bactericidal activity. Moreover, the decrease in bacterial counts was comparable to smear-positive individuals. Increasing cycle threshold values (Ct) on the Xpert assay in smear-positive patients to day 14 implied decreasing bacterial load.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest that smear-negative PLH can be included in clinical trials of novel treatment regimens as they contain sufficient viable bacteria, but allowances for late exclusions would have to be made in sample size estimations. We also show that increases in Ct in smear-positive patients to day 14 reflect treatment responses and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay could be used as biomarker for early treatment response.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34022850
doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06133-4
pii: 10.1186/s12879-021-06133-4
pmc: PMC8141145
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Antitubercular Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
466Références
Lancet. 2007 Jun 16;369(9578):2042-2049
pubmed: 17574096
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun 1;189(11):1426-34
pubmed: 24786895
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 13;358(11):1089-92
pubmed: 18337598
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000 Jun;4(6):528-36
pubmed: 10864183
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 Mar;20(3):290-4
pubmed: 27046707
BMC Med. 2018 May 21;16(1):73
pubmed: 29779492
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Jul;18(7):711-7
pubmed: 21851489
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008 Apr;21(2):305-33, table of contents
pubmed: 18400799
Eur Respir J. 2016 Feb;47(2):670-2
pubmed: 26647435
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jul;48(7):2495-501
pubmed: 20504986
J Commun Dis. 2010 Dec;42(4):241-7
pubmed: 22471192
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):229-37
pubmed: 19864480
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011 Jun;8(3):288-93
pubmed: 21653530
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Feb;70(2):448-55
pubmed: 25344806
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):DC09-12
pubmed: 27437212
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):e1000391
pubmed: 21267059
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec 15;194(12):1532-1540
pubmed: 27387272
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 May 1;21(5):493-502
pubmed: 28399963
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;29(12):1561-5
pubmed: 20820832
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Jul;28(3):153-6
pubmed: 9294706
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 26;8(1):5201
pubmed: 29581435
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 May 15;50 Suppl 3:S201-7
pubmed: 20397949
mBio. 2017 Aug 29;8(4):
pubmed: 28851844
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Mar 1;111(3):132-136
pubmed: 28633335
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Aug;51(8):2994-6
pubmed: 17517849
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 7;365(1):11-20
pubmed: 21732833