Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review.

Assisted vaginal birth Complex interventions Forceps Odon Device Reporting standards Ventouse

Journal

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
ISSN: 1872-7654
Titre abrégé: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0375672

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 30 12 2020
revised: 29 04 2021
accepted: 11 05 2021
pubmed: 24 5 2021
medline: 30 6 2021
entrez: 23 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a complex intervention involving medical devices, comprising multiple components. This complexity creates difficulties when designing and conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs), in terms of describing, standardising and monitoring the intervention, and accounting for differing clinician expertise. This review examines the reporting standards of complex interventions involving a medical device, in the context of AVB RCTs. Searches were undertaken from the start of indexing to March 2021, and limited to RCTs, feasibility and pilot studies including at least one device for AVB. RCTs were selected if they included participants having an AVB with any device, with or without a comparator group. Reporting details were assessed according to the Consolidating Standards of Reporting Trials extension for non-pharmacological treatments (CONSORT-NPT), focusing on intervention descriptions, standardization, adherence and clinician expertise. Screening of abstracts, full-text articles and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Of 4098 abstracts and 83 full-text articles, 39 papers were included, investigating 80 interventions. Twenty-seven different named devices were identified. Intervention descriptions were provided in 20 (55%) papers with varying levels of detail and with only one covering the entire procedure. Standardization of interventions was mentioned in 25 papers (64%). Only eight (21%) papers reported any form of adherence to the intended procedure. Some data regarding expertise were reported in 25 (64%) papers. Despite some compliance with reporting standards, there is a lack of detail regarding intervention description, standardization, adherence and expertise in RCTs of AVB. This creates difficulties in understanding how intervention delivery was intended and what actually occurred. Clearer guidelines for the reporting of invasive procedures and devices are required.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34023718
pii: S0301-2115(21)00249-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.026
pmc: PMC8250286
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

166-173

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K025643/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S001751/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest EJH, SR, JFC, TJD are employees of North Bristol NHS Trust, which receives funding from PROMPT Maternity Foundation (PMF) to pay part of their salaries. PMF has received funds from Becton Dickinson, manufacturer of the Odon Device to run pre-clinical simulation studies on the device. EL is an employee of the University of Bristol, which receives funding from PMF to pay part of EL’s salary. NSB is an MRC Clinician Scientist.

Références

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Jul;22(4):344-5
pubmed: 12521450
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;58(2):256-62
pubmed: 25811126
Reprod Health. 2013 Jul 02;10:33
pubmed: 23822879
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 May;96(5):537-44
pubmed: 2667628
BJOG. 2011 Sep;118(10):1247-52
pubmed: 21585643
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Oct;14(5):707-18
pubmed: 25196848
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008 Jun;34(3):350-3
pubmed: 18686348
J Med Assoc Thai. 1998 Jul;81(7):480-6
pubmed: 9676083
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 15;15:332
pubmed: 26666981
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 18;3(12):e003898
pubmed: 24353256
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(3):154-65
pubmed: 26044729
Trials. 2019 Mar 5;20(1):159
pubmed: 30836979
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 19;148(4):295-309
pubmed: 18283207
J Perinat Med. 1987;15(2):129-36
pubmed: 3656045
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Oct 31;6(1):167
pubmed: 33292770
Trials. 2017 Sep 13;18(1):427
pubmed: 28903769
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jul 4;167(1):40-47
pubmed: 28630973
Med Care. 2013 Apr;51(4 Suppl 2):S32-40
pubmed: 23502915
Br J Surg. 2016 Sep;103(10):1377-84
pubmed: 27462835
BMJ Open. 2011 May 15;1(1):e000155
pubmed: 22021778
BMJ. 2013 May 07;346:f2771
pubmed: 23653340
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92
pubmed: 23159157
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Sep;94(6):388-94
pubmed: 22943327
Implement Sci. 2007 Nov 30;2:40
pubmed: 18053122
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):55-9
pubmed: 7631727
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;175(5):1325-30
pubmed: 8942509
BMJ. 2011 May 13;342:d2748
pubmed: 21572130
BJOG. 2006 Feb;113(2):183-9
pubmed: 16411996
BJOG. 2005 Nov;112(11):1510-5
pubmed: 16225571
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;78(4):646-50
pubmed: 1923169
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):607.e1-607.e17
pubmed: 33316274
Trials. 2014 Jun 02;15:200
pubmed: 24888266
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jan;104(1):33-6
pubmed: 8988693
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Jun;50(3):246-52
pubmed: 20618242
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 May;96(5):545-51
pubmed: 2667629
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;82(2):280-4
pubmed: 8336878
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 15;19(1):59
pubmed: 30876403
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
pubmed: 19622551
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Jun;100(6):524-30
pubmed: 8334086
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Feb;68(2):101-2
pubmed: 24022816
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65(7):791-2
pubmed: 3544665
Singapore Med J. 1996 Feb;37(1):55-60
pubmed: 8783915
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 May;99(5):360-3
pubmed: 1622904
Br J Surg. 2015 Aug;102(9):1037-47
pubmed: 26041565
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Nov;66(5):624-8
pubmed: 4058820
Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 12;15(1):45
pubmed: 29526165
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 14;9(4):e028300
pubmed: 30987994
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992 Jul 24;45(3):173-6
pubmed: 1511762
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2000 Nov;68:453-9
pubmed: 11195958
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):789-94
pubmed: 1923198

Auteurs

Emily J Hotton (EJ)

Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: emily.hotton@nhs.net.

Sophie Renwick (S)

Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Erik Lenguerrand (E)

Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Julia Wade (J)

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Tim J Draycott (TJ)

Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Joanna F Crofts (JF)

Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Natalie S Blencowe (NS)

Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH