Influence of hydrogel encapsulation during cryopreservation of ovarian tissues and impact of post-thawing in vitro culture systems in a research animal model.

Cryopreservation Fertility preservation Hydrogel In vitro culture Ovarian tissue

Journal

Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine
ISSN: 2233-8233
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Reprod Med
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101563916

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 27 08 2020
accepted: 31 03 2021
pubmed: 25 5 2021
medline: 25 5 2021
entrez: 24 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Using domestic cats as a biomedical research model for fertility preservation, the present study aimed to characterize the influences of ovarian tissue encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogel matrix (fibrinogen/thrombin) on resilience to cryopreservation, and static versus non-static culture systems following ovarian tissue encapsulation and cryopreservation on follicle quality. In experiment I, ovarian tissues (n=21 animals; 567 ovarian fragments) were assigned to controls or hydrogel encapsulation with 5 or 10 mg/mL fibrinogen (5 or 10 FG). Following cryopreservation (slow freezing or vitrification), follicle viability, morphology, density, and key protein phosphorylation were assessed. In experiment II (based on the findings from experiment I), ovarian tissues (n=10 animals; 270 ovarian fragments) were encapsulated with 10 FG, cryopreserved, and in vitro cultured under static or non-static systems for 7 days followed by similar follicle quality assessments. In experiment I, the combination of 10 FG encapsulation/slow freezing led to greater post-thawed follicle quality than in the control group, as shown by follicle viability (66.9%±2.2% vs. 61.5%±3.1%), normal follicle morphology (62.2%±2.1% vs. 55.2%±3.5%), and the relative band intensity of vascular endothelial growth factor protein phosphorylation (0.58±0.06 vs. 0.42±0.09). Experiment II demonstrated that hydrogel encapsulation promoted follicle survival and maintenance of follicle development regardless of the culture system when compared to fresh controls. These results provide a better understanding of the role of hydrogel encapsulation and culture systems in ovarian tissue cryopreservation and follicle quality outcomes using an animal model, paving the way for optimized approaches to human fertility preservation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34024082
pii: cerm.2020.04056
doi: 10.5653/cerm.2020.04056
pmc: PMC8176157
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

111-123

Subventions

Organisme : Ratchaphiseksomphot Endowment
ID : RA61/066
Organisme : Research Unit of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

Références

Reprod Domest Anim. 2012 Aug;47 Suppl 4:59-71
pubmed: 22827351
Tissue Eng Part A. 2011 Dec;17(23-24):3095-104
pubmed: 21740332
J Microencapsul. 2016;33(2):137-45
pubmed: 26791322
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15459
pubmed: 29133858
Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;101(4):1149-56
pubmed: 24462059
Cell Rep. 2015 Sep 22;12(11):1761-73
pubmed: 26344773
Transfus Med Hemother. 2019 Jun;46(3):173-181
pubmed: 31244585
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jan;35(1):41-48
pubmed: 29236205
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):427-35
pubmed: 26628641
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Feb;45(2):266-279
pubmed: 30246274
J Vis Exp. 2011 Sep 19;(55):
pubmed: 21968517
Adv Funct Mater. 2015 Nov 25;25(44):6939-6850
pubmed: 26640426
Micromachines (Basel). 2017 Nov 20;8(11):
pubmed: 30400524
Reprod Domest Anim. 2012 Dec;47 Suppl 6:102-8
pubmed: 23279476
Theriogenology. 2015 Jun;83(9):1553-61
pubmed: 25747194
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Jul;36(7):1401-1412
pubmed: 31079268
Reprod Med Biol. 2019 Aug 13;18(4):362-369
pubmed: 31607796
Cryobiology. 2013 Aug;67(1):64-9
pubmed: 23688636
Biomed Microdevices. 2010 Feb;12(1):89-96
pubmed: 19787454
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 22;10(1):994
pubmed: 31969661
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Aug;32(8):1239-50
pubmed: 26249553
Hum Reprod. 2002 Mar;17(3):612-9
pubmed: 11870112
Reproduction. 2019 Nov;158(5):F15-F25
pubmed: 31075758
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20008
pubmed: 31882972
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29319
pubmed: 22235284
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Apr;35(4):551-560
pubmed: 29470702
Int J Mol Med. 2018 Apr;41(4):2350-2358
pubmed: 29393364
Cardiovasc Res. 2005 Feb 15;65(3):639-48
pubmed: 15664390
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 May;98(5):659-664
pubmed: 30714119
Yale J Biol Med. 2017 Sep 25;90(3):417-431
pubmed: 28955181
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun 30;95(8):2661-4.e1
pubmed: 21300348
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 08;20(13):
pubmed: 31288388
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010 Aug 30;325(1-2):93-100
pubmed: 20417686
Ann Biomed Eng. 2017 Jul;45(7):1770-1781
pubmed: 28070774
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 08;10(4):e0123451
pubmed: 25853900
Nat Commun. 2017 Mar 28;8:14584
pubmed: 28350383
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8538
pubmed: 28819292
Cell Tissue Bank. 2018 Dec;19(4):819-826
pubmed: 30465307
Reprod Domest Anim. 2012 Oct;47(5):777-81
pubmed: 22151534
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 25;19(11):
pubmed: 30366453

Auteurs

Paweena Thuwanut (P)

Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Research Unit of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Pierre Comizzoli (P)

Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA.

Alongkorn Pimpin (A)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Weerayut Srituravanich (W)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Wisan Sereepapong (W)

Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Research Unit of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Kamthorn Pruksananonda (K)

Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Research Unit of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Charoen Taweepolcharoen (C)

Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Research Unit of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Punkavee Tuntiviriyapun (P)

Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Research Unit of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Chanakarn Suebthawinkul (C)

Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Research Unit of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Porntip Sirayapiwat (P)

Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Research Unit of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Classifications MeSH