TMA-93 Validation by Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers: A Comparison with the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test on a Biobank Sample.


Journal

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD
ISSN: 1875-8908
Titre abrégé: J Alzheimers Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9814863

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
pubmed: 25 5 2021
medline: 28 9 2021
entrez: 24 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Memory Associative Test TMA-93 examines visual relational binding, characteristically affected in early-AD stages. We aim to validate the TMA-93 by biomarkers determination and compare its diagnostic characteristics with the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT). Retrospective analysis of a Biobank database. Patients' records initially consulted for memory complaints, scored MMSE≥22, had TMA-93 and FCSRT tested, and AD biomarker determination (Amyloid-PET or CSF), either positive or negative, were selected. As cutoffs, we considered the 10-percentile for TMA-93 (P10/TMA-93), and "total free recall" (TFR) 21/22, total recall (TR) 43/44, and Cued Index < 0.77 for FCSRT from previous Spanish validation and normative studies. Diagnostic utilities were calculated using ROC curves and compared by the DeLong method. We studied if one test improved the other test's prediction, following a forward stepwise logistic regression model. We selected 105 records: 64 "positive" and 41 "negative" biomarkers. TMA-93 total score diagnostic utility (AUC = 0.72; 95%CI:0.62-0.82) was higher than those of the FCSRT: TFR (AUC = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.60-0.80), TR (AUC = 0.63; 95%CI:0.53-0.74), and Cued Index (AUC = 0.62; 95%CI:0.52-0.73). The P10/TMA-93 cutoff showed 86%sensitivity, similar to that of the most sensitive FCSRT cutoff (TFR21/22, 89%) and 29%specificity, lower than that of the most specific FCSRT cutoff (Cued Index < 0.77, 57%). 32.8%of the positive-biomarker group scored above CI/0.77 but below p10TMA-93. The addition of TMA-93 total score to FCSRT variables improved significantly the biomarkers results' prediction. TMA-93 demonstrated "reasonable" diagnostic utility, similar to FCSRT, for discriminating AD biomarker groups. TMA-93 total score improved the AD biomarker result prediction when added to FCSRT variables.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The Memory Associative Test TMA-93 examines visual relational binding, characteristically affected in early-AD stages.
OBJECTIVE
We aim to validate the TMA-93 by biomarkers determination and compare its diagnostic characteristics with the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT).
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of a Biobank database. Patients' records initially consulted for memory complaints, scored MMSE≥22, had TMA-93 and FCSRT tested, and AD biomarker determination (Amyloid-PET or CSF), either positive or negative, were selected. As cutoffs, we considered the 10-percentile for TMA-93 (P10/TMA-93), and "total free recall" (TFR) 21/22, total recall (TR) 43/44, and Cued Index < 0.77 for FCSRT from previous Spanish validation and normative studies. Diagnostic utilities were calculated using ROC curves and compared by the DeLong method. We studied if one test improved the other test's prediction, following a forward stepwise logistic regression model.
RESULTS
We selected 105 records: 64 "positive" and 41 "negative" biomarkers. TMA-93 total score diagnostic utility (AUC = 0.72; 95%CI:0.62-0.82) was higher than those of the FCSRT: TFR (AUC = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.60-0.80), TR (AUC = 0.63; 95%CI:0.53-0.74), and Cued Index (AUC = 0.62; 95%CI:0.52-0.73). The P10/TMA-93 cutoff showed 86%sensitivity, similar to that of the most sensitive FCSRT cutoff (TFR21/22, 89%) and 29%specificity, lower than that of the most specific FCSRT cutoff (Cued Index < 0.77, 57%). 32.8%of the positive-biomarker group scored above CI/0.77 but below p10TMA-93. The addition of TMA-93 total score to FCSRT variables improved significantly the biomarkers results' prediction.
CONCLUSION
TMA-93 demonstrated "reasonable" diagnostic utility, similar to FCSRT, for discriminating AD biomarker groups. TMA-93 total score improved the AD biomarker result prediction when added to FCSRT variables.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34024831
pii: JAD210115
doi: 10.3233/JAD-210115
doi:

Substances chimiques

Amyloid beta-Peptides 0
Biomarkers 0
Peptide Fragments 0
amyloid beta-protein (1-40) 0
amyloid beta-protein (1-42) 0
tau Proteins 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

401-410

Auteurs

Silvia Rodrigo-Herrero (S)

Memory Unit, Juan Ramón Jiménez University Hospital, Huelva, Spain.

Andrea Luque-Tirado (A)

Memory Unit, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

Carlota Méndez-Barrio (C)

Memory Unit, Juan Ramón Jiménez University Hospital, Huelva, Spain.

David García-Solís (D)

Nuclear Medicine Unit, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

María Bernal Sánchez-Arjona (M)

Memory Unit, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

Juan Manuel Oropesa-Ruiz (JM)

Memory Unit, Juan Ramón Jiménez University Hospital, Huelva, Spain.

Didier Maillet (D)

Neurology Service, Saint-Louis Hospital (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Emilio Franco-Macías (E)

Memory Unit, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH