Phase-Dependent Crossed Inhibition Mediating Coordination of Anti-phase Bilateral Rhythmic Movement: A Mini Review.
bilateral coordination
central pattern generator
crossed inhibition
extensor half center
flexor half center
half center model
locomotion
rhythmic movement
Journal
Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
16
02
2021
accepted:
12
04
2021
entrez:
24
5
2021
pubmed:
25
5
2021
medline:
25
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The activity of the left and right central pattern generators (CPGs) is efficiently coordinated during locomotion. To achieve this coordination, the interplay between the CPG controlling one leg and that controlling another must be present. Previous findings in aquatic vertebrates and mammalians suggest that the alternate activation of the left and right CPGs is mediated by the commissural interneurons crossing the midline of the spinal cord. Especially, V0 commissural interneurons mediate crossed inhibition during the alternative activity of the left and right CPGs. Even in humans, phase-dependent modulation of the crossed afferent inhibition during gait has been reported. Based on those previous findings, crossed inhibition of the CPG in one leg side caused by the activation of the contralateral CPG is a possible mechanism underlying the coordination of the anti-phase rhythmic movement of the legs. It has been hypothesized that the activity of the flexor half center in the CPG inhibits the contralateral flexor half center, but crossed inhibition of the extensor half center is not present because of the existence of the double limb support during gait. Nevertheless, previous findings on the phase-dependent crossed inhibition during anti-phase bilateral movement of the legs are not in line with this hypothesis. For example, extensor activity caused crossed inhibition of the flexor half center during bilateral cycling of the legs. In another study, the ankle extensor was inhibited at the period switching from extension to flexion during anti-phase rhythmic movement of the ankles. In this review article, I provide a critical discussion about crossed inhibition mediating the coordination of the anti-phase bilateral rhythmic movement of the legs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34025379
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.668442
pmc: PMC8136415
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
668442Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Hiraoka.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Neurosci. 1997 Dec 15;17(24):9433-47
pubmed: 9390999
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Oct;232(10):3069-78
pubmed: 24888533
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;105(2):503-11
pubmed: 21106895
Trends Neurosci. 1988 Jul;11(7):328-32
pubmed: 2465639
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jul;10(7):507-18
pubmed: 19543221
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Nov 16;860:360-76
pubmed: 9928325
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002 Oct;40(1-3):107-17
pubmed: 12589910
Neuron. 2016 Dec 7;92(5):1063-1078
pubmed: 27866798
J Neurosci. 2009 May 27;29(21):7098-109
pubmed: 19474336
eNeuro. 2015 Sep 22;2(5):
pubmed: 26478909
Brain Res. 1998 Jan 1;779(1-2):280-4
pubmed: 9473695
J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 20;25(29):6869-76
pubmed: 16033896
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005 Nov;49(3):641-62
pubmed: 15904971
J Physiol. 2019 Jul;597(13):3457-3471
pubmed: 31111966
Brain Res. 1993 Feb 12;603(1):96-101
pubmed: 8453480
J Neurosci. 1985 May;5(5):1276-82
pubmed: 3998821
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Nov 21;445(3):209-13
pubmed: 18793696
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Aug;10(8):1055-62
pubmed: 17603479
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;107(11):3168-80
pubmed: 22442562
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:279-306
pubmed: 16776587
Brain Res. 1998 Jun 8;795(1-2):25-36
pubmed: 9622587
Prog Neurobiol. 1995 Dec;47(6):533-44
pubmed: 8787034
Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jan;57(1):183-91
pubmed: 17928060
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Jun;84(6):557-61
pubmed: 11482551
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 07;10:95
pubmed: 27014026
Brain Res Rev. 2009 Dec 11;62(1):45-56
pubmed: 19720083
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):989-98
pubmed: 18094100
Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jan;57(1):134-46
pubmed: 17936363
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Feb;130(3):375-91
pubmed: 10706436
Exp Brain Res. 1995;106(3):449-56
pubmed: 8983988
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010 May 21;396(1):11-8
pubmed: 20494103
Motor Control. 2014 Jan;18(1):88-100
pubmed: 24496881
Elife. 2017 Nov 22;6:
pubmed: 29165245
Brain Res. 1992 Jun 5;582(1):85-93
pubmed: 1498683
Neuroscientist. 2012 Feb;18(1):56-69
pubmed: 21518815
Neurosci Lett. 1987 Mar 20;75(1):43-8
pubmed: 3554010
J Neurosci. 1996 Sep 15;16(18):5777-94
pubmed: 8795632
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3596-605
pubmed: 19812287
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 May;27(5):1287-90
pubmed: 26157202
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;88(3):1308-17
pubmed: 12205152
Exp Brain Res. 1994;101(3):513-20
pubmed: 7851518
Curr Biol. 2015 Jun 1;25(11):1426-36
pubmed: 25959968
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 1;9(1):3273
pubmed: 30824858
J Physiol. 1914 Mar 31;48(1):18-46
pubmed: 16993247
Brain Res Bull. 2003 Jul 15;61(2):219-26
pubmed: 12832009
Muscle Nerve. 2011 Jun;43(6):845-50
pubmed: 21607968
Nature. 2013 Aug 1;500(7460):85-8
pubmed: 23812590
Trends Neurosci. 2002 Sep;25(9):462-7
pubmed: 12183207
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;80(3):1341-51
pubmed: 9744943
Biosystems. 2003 Sep;71(1-2):11-21
pubmed: 14568202
Brain Res. 2010 Jan 15;1310:77-86
pubmed: 19913521
J Neurophysiol. 2014 May;111(9):1865-76
pubmed: 24501265