A quality improvement project for delirium prevention and management over the Greater Manchester Critical Care Network.
Delirium
critical care
critical illness
delirium care bundles
patient care bundles
Journal
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
ISSN: 1751-1437
Titre abrégé: J Intensive Care Soc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101538668
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
entrez:
24
5
2021
pubmed:
25
5
2021
medline:
25
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Delirium is a common complication of critical illness with a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. The Greater Manchester Critical Care Network established the Delirium Reduction Working Group in 2015. This article describes a region-wide delirium improvement project launched by that group. Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were undertaken. Cycle 1: April 2015 demonstrated only 48% of patients had a formal delirium screen. Following this a network-wide event took place and the Delirium Standards for the Greater Manchester Critical Care Network were produced. Cycle 2: May 2016 quarterly audits across the network monitored compliance against the agreed standards. Group events involved implementation of a delirium care bundle, sharing best practice, educating staff and providing guidance on the management of delirium. Cycle 3: November 2016 quarterly audit continued and a regional delirium study day was rolled out across the region. We have 14 different units across our network, all of which have participated in the audit. The first audit showed a delirium point prevalence of 28%, subsequent point prevalence audits demonstrated rates as low as 13%. There has also been an improvement in the use of delirium screening tools. In the first audit 37% of patients had two delirium screens in 24 h, this has increased to 60% in the latest audit. Improvements were also made in availability of sensory aids and pain assessments. The project has demonstrated the feasibility of delivering a coordinated delirium improvement project across multiple critical care units.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Delirium is a common complication of critical illness with a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. The Greater Manchester Critical Care Network established the Delirium Reduction Working Group in 2015. This article describes a region-wide delirium improvement project launched by that group.
METHODS
METHODS
Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were undertaken. Cycle 1: April 2015 demonstrated only 48% of patients had a formal delirium screen. Following this a network-wide event took place and the Delirium Standards for the Greater Manchester Critical Care Network were produced. Cycle 2: May 2016 quarterly audits across the network monitored compliance against the agreed standards. Group events involved implementation of a delirium care bundle, sharing best practice, educating staff and providing guidance on the management of delirium. Cycle 3: November 2016 quarterly audit continued and a regional delirium study day was rolled out across the region.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We have 14 different units across our network, all of which have participated in the audit. The first audit showed a delirium point prevalence of 28%, subsequent point prevalence audits demonstrated rates as low as 13%. There has also been an improvement in the use of delirium screening tools. In the first audit 37% of patients had two delirium screens in 24 h, this has increased to 60% in the latest audit. Improvements were also made in availability of sensory aids and pain assessments.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The project has demonstrated the feasibility of delivering a coordinated delirium improvement project across multiple critical care units.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34025751
doi: 10.1177/1751143720912700
pii: 10.1177_1751143720912700
pmc: PMC8120568
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
120-126Informations de copyright
© The Intensive Care Society 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1753-62
pubmed: 15082703
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jun;37(6):1881-5
pubmed: 19384206
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1306-16
pubmed: 24088092
BMJ. 2015 Jun 03;350:h2538
pubmed: 26041151