A multidimensional framework for rating health system performance and sustainability: A nine plus one ranking system.
Journal
Journal of global health
ISSN: 2047-2986
Titre abrégé: J Glob Health
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101578780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 May 2021
08 May 2021
Historique:
entrez:
24
5
2021
pubmed:
25
5
2021
medline:
19
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health Care provision in terms of prevention, detection and treatment is primarily dependent on the quality of the hosting Health System. In its health report 2000, the WHO's attempt to assess and rank health systems' quality Worldwide was heavily criticized. We propose a novel framework for health system performance and ranking using three indicators for three domains; general health system performance, clinical outcome of treatment applied to the main causes of death and health system sustainability domains. Each domain was rated as "A - high", "B - intermediate" or "C - poor" according to the aggregate score values of its three indicators. Hence the highest rank a health system can achieve is "AAA" and the lowest is "CCC". If there is a need to define a "numerical rank" to further differentiate health systems with similar rating from one another, the total health expenditure per capita per year was used as an additional "number 10" indicator to achieve that level of differentiation. The framework was applied to Health Systems serving most of the World population including China, India, Brazil, USA, Russia, Germany, Japan, UK, France, Singapore and Switzerland. Data pertinent to each indicator was captured from published reports in peer-reviewed journals and/or from official websites. A Delphi survey was conducted for data not available online. Among the 11 health systems tested, no one scored AAA, Switzerland, France, Germany and Japan scored AAB, Singapore scored ABB, UK scored BBB, USA, Russia and China scored BBC, Brazil scored BCC while India scored CCC. Total health expenditure per capita per year lead to ranking Switzerland first followed by France, Germany, and Japan. This novel ranking system is a practical and an applicable tool that test health system performance and sustainability. It can be utilized to guide all organizations, people and actions whose primary intent is to promote, restore or maintain health to achieve their targets. An International Health System Ranking database that will be hosted by the Institute of Global, Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Health Care provision in terms of prevention, detection and treatment is primarily dependent on the quality of the hosting Health System. In its health report 2000, the WHO's attempt to assess and rank health systems' quality Worldwide was heavily criticized. We propose a novel framework for health system performance and ranking using three indicators for three domains; general health system performance, clinical outcome of treatment applied to the main causes of death and health system sustainability domains.
METHODS
METHODS
Each domain was rated as "A - high", "B - intermediate" or "C - poor" according to the aggregate score values of its three indicators. Hence the highest rank a health system can achieve is "AAA" and the lowest is "CCC". If there is a need to define a "numerical rank" to further differentiate health systems with similar rating from one another, the total health expenditure per capita per year was used as an additional "number 10" indicator to achieve that level of differentiation. The framework was applied to Health Systems serving most of the World population including China, India, Brazil, USA, Russia, Germany, Japan, UK, France, Singapore and Switzerland. Data pertinent to each indicator was captured from published reports in peer-reviewed journals and/or from official websites. A Delphi survey was conducted for data not available online.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 11 health systems tested, no one scored AAA, Switzerland, France, Germany and Japan scored AAB, Singapore scored ABB, UK scored BBB, USA, Russia and China scored BBC, Brazil scored BCC while India scored CCC. Total health expenditure per capita per year lead to ranking Switzerland first followed by France, Germany, and Japan.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This novel ranking system is a practical and an applicable tool that test health system performance and sustainability. It can be utilized to guide all organizations, people and actions whose primary intent is to promote, restore or maintain health to achieve their targets. An International Health System Ranking database that will be hosted by the Institute of Global, Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34026052
doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04025
pii: jogh-11-04025
pmc: PMC8109277
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
04025Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Indian J Public Health. 2013 Oct-Dec;57(4):225-30
pubmed: 24351383
Lancet. 2001 May 26;357(9269):1692-7
pubmed: 11425394
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Sep;25(5):346-8
pubmed: 20798126
Surgery. 2015 Jul;158(1):27-32
pubmed: 25934078
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 May;5(5):e480-e481
pubmed: 28302563
Lancet. 2003 May 24;361(9371):1817-20
pubmed: 12781555
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1160-1203
pubmed: 33069325
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Feb;19(1):14-21
pubmed: 20172877
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):201-209F
pubmed: 26966331
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 09;17(5):
pubmed: 32182952
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1859-1922
pubmed: 30415748
J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010407
pubmed: 29564084
BMJ. 2021 Feb 17;372:n334
pubmed: 33597166
Global Health. 2014 Feb 13;10:5
pubmed: 24524554
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Dec 1;28(6):715-720
pubmed: 27578631
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1250-1284
pubmed: 32861314
Science. 2001 Aug 31;293(5535):1595-6
pubmed: 11533463
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Apr 27;3 Suppl 2:S13-20
pubmed: 25926315
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 6;370(6):552-7
pubmed: 24499213
PLoS Med. 2014 Sep 22;11(9):e1001731
pubmed: 25243899
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1099-1108
pubmed: 29924637
J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:8-20
pubmed: 16096142
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Feb;7(2):e179-e180
pubmed: 30683230
Health Econ. 2003 May;12(5):355-66
pubmed: 12720253
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Sep 15;14:80
pubmed: 26369417
Lancet. 2018 Jun 2;391(10136):2236-2271
pubmed: 29893224
Lancet. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2233-2260
pubmed: 31030984
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Mar 1;93(3):203-8
pubmed: 25767300
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 25;15:415
pubmed: 26407626
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252
pubmed: 30196093
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Sep 1;96(9):591-591A
pubmed: 30262936
Lancet. 2018 Apr 14;391(10129):1538-1548
pubmed: 29395268