Opportunities and challenges of using augmented reality and heads-up display in orthopaedic surgery: A narrative review.
AR, Augmented Reality
Augmented reality
HUD, Heads-Up Display
Heads-up display
Innovation
Surgery
VR, Virtual Reality
Virtual reality
Journal
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
08
02
2021
revised:
28
03
2021
accepted:
29
04
2021
entrez:
24
5
2021
pubmed:
25
5
2021
medline:
25
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Utilization of augmented reality (AR) and heads-up displays (HUD) to aid orthopaedic surgery has the potential to benefit surgeons and patients alike through improved accuracy, safety, and educational benefits. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the opportunity for adoption of novel technology is more relevant. The aims are to assess the technology available, to understand the current evidence regarding the benefit and to consider challenges to implementation in clinical practice. PRISMA guidelines were used to filter the literature. Of 1004 articles returned the following exclusion criteria were applied: 1) reviews/commentaries 2) unrelated to orthopaedic surgery 3) use of other AR wearables beyond visual aids leaving 42 papers for review.This review illustrates benefits including enhanced accuracy and reduced time of surgery, reduced radiation exposure and educational benefits. Whilst there are obstacles to overcome, there are already reports of technology being used. As with all novel technologies, a greater understanding of the learning curve is crucial, in addition to shielding our patients from this learning curve. Improvements in usability and implementing surgeons' specific needs should increase uptake.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND & AIM
OBJECTIVE
Utilization of augmented reality (AR) and heads-up displays (HUD) to aid orthopaedic surgery has the potential to benefit surgeons and patients alike through improved accuracy, safety, and educational benefits. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the opportunity for adoption of novel technology is more relevant. The aims are to assess the technology available, to understand the current evidence regarding the benefit and to consider challenges to implementation in clinical practice.
METHODS & RESULTS
RESULTS
PRISMA guidelines were used to filter the literature. Of 1004 articles returned the following exclusion criteria were applied: 1) reviews/commentaries 2) unrelated to orthopaedic surgery 3) use of other AR wearables beyond visual aids leaving 42 papers for review.This review illustrates benefits including enhanced accuracy and reduced time of surgery, reduced radiation exposure and educational benefits.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Whilst there are obstacles to overcome, there are already reports of technology being used. As with all novel technologies, a greater understanding of the learning curve is crucial, in addition to shielding our patients from this learning curve. Improvements in usability and implementing surgeons' specific needs should increase uptake.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34026489
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.031
pii: S0976-5662(21)00253-8
pmc: PMC8131920
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
209-215Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2021 All rights reserved.
Références
Eur Radiol Exp. 2018;2(1):2
pubmed: 29708204
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 1;45(1):E45-E53
pubmed: 31415457
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Aug;14(4):e1914
pubmed: 29708640
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Oct;19(4):492-501
pubmed: 23952323
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Sep;8(5):951-6
pubmed: 24876445
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Oct;128(10):1123-6
pubmed: 18000674
Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 Apr;44(4):836-46
pubmed: 26467553
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Aug;92(8):1128-33
pubmed: 20675759
Surg Innov. 2016 Aug;23(4):422-6
pubmed: 27146972
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Jun;11(6):1007-14
pubmed: 26995603
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Dec;37(6):1589-96
pubmed: 24722894
Br J Radiol. 2012 Dec;85(1020):e1166-73
pubmed: 23175483
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;138:369-373
pubmed: 32201294
Scott Med J. 2020 Nov;65(4):133-137
pubmed: 32772846
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1093:193-205
pubmed: 30306483
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Nov 1;2018:5435097
pubmed: 30515284
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Aug;136(2):328-330
pubmed: 26218380
Phys Ther. 2019 Oct 28;99(10):1304-1325
pubmed: 31343702
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 1):373-80
pubmed: 17354912
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017 Feb 10;6(1):
pubmed: 28243441
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1190-1199
pubmed: 30507832
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 4;14(12):e0225972
pubmed: 31800637
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Apr;14(2):
pubmed: 29266806
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 07;9(8):
pubmed: 32784745
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Jun;14(6):913-922
pubmed: 30863981
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013 May;8(3):365-78
pubmed: 22926549
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Mar;14(3):525-535
pubmed: 29934792
Invest Radiol. 2018 Aug;53(8):495-498
pubmed: 29742535
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6):1636-1641.e3
pubmed: 32063415
Eur Spine J. 2019 Jul;28(7):1697-1711
pubmed: 30953169
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 15;21(1):103
pubmed: 32061248
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Apr;15(2):e1969
pubmed: 30447128
Bone Joint J. 2019 Dec;101-B(12):1479-1488
pubmed: 31786992
Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;46(10):1595-1605
pubmed: 29796955
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2015 Apr;41:55-60
pubmed: 24998759
Eur Spine J. 2020 Jul;29(7):1580-1589
pubmed: 31270676
Orthopedics. 2014 Nov;37(11):751-7
pubmed: 25361359
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Apr;5(2):021209
pubmed: 29392161
Injury. 2020 May;51 Suppl 2:S51-S56
pubmed: 31706585
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(Suppl 5):S171
pubmed: 31624737
Healthc Technol Lett. 2018 Oct 1;5(5):143-147
pubmed: 30464844
Microsurgery. 1995;16(11):746-51
pubmed: 9148102
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Jul;7(4):547-56
pubmed: 22015571
Front Surg. 2019 Jun 27;6:38
pubmed: 31316995