Design Optimization of a Pneumatic Soft Robotic Actuator Using Model-Based Optimization and Deep Reinforcement Learning.
deep reinforcement learning
design of soft robots
design optimization
firefly algorithm
soft actuators
soft robotics
Journal
Frontiers in robotics and AI
ISSN: 2296-9144
Titre abrégé: Front Robot AI
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101749350
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
08
12
2020
accepted:
07
04
2021
entrez:
24
5
2021
pubmed:
25
5
2021
medline:
25
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We present two frameworks for design optimization of a multi-chamber pneumatic-driven soft actuator to optimize its mechanical performance. The design goal is to achieve maximal horizontal motion of the top surface of the actuator with a minimum effect on its vertical motion. The parametric shape and layout of air chambers are optimized individually with the firefly algorithm and a deep reinforcement learning approach using both a model-based formulation and finite element analysis. The presented modeling approach extends the analytical formulations for tapered and thickened cantilever beams connected in a structure with virtual spring elements. The deep reinforcement learning-based approach is combined with both the model- and finite element-based environments to fully explore the design space and for comparison and cross-validation purposes. The two-chamber soft actuator was specifically designed to be integrated as a modular element into a soft robotic pad system used for pressure injury prevention, where local control of planar displacements can be advantageous to mitigate the risk of pressure injuries and blisters by minimizing shear forces at the skin-pad contact. A comparison of the results shows that designs achieved using the deep reinforcement based approach best decouples the horizontal and vertical motions, while producing the necessary displacement for the intended application. The results from optimizations were compared computationally and experimentally to the empirically obtained design in the existing literature to validate the optimized design and methodology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34026857
doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.639102
pmc: PMC8138170
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
639102Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Raeisinezhad, Pagliocca, Koohbor and Trkov.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Sci Robot. 2016 Dec 6;1(1):
pubmed: 33157856
Soft Robot. 2019 Feb;6(1):118-132
pubmed: 30407120
Soft Robot. 2015 Mar 1;2(1):7-25
pubmed: 27625913
Adv Mater. 2017 Apr;29(13):
pubmed: 28032926
Soft Robot. 2016 Mar 1;3(1):23-33
pubmed: 27625917
Adv Mater. 2017 Nov;29(43):
pubmed: 28949425
Trends Biotechnol. 2013 May;31(5):287-94
pubmed: 23582470
Soft Robot. 2018 Oct;5(5):622-649
pubmed: 30161015
Adv Mater. 2015 Nov 18;27(43):6814-9
pubmed: 26418227
Soft Robot. 2018 Oct;5(5):650-661
pubmed: 29985781
Wilderness Environ Med. 2006 Summer;17(2):109-19
pubmed: 16805147