Adolescent Attachment: A Social Relations Perspective on Family Relations.
Adolescence
Attachment
Family relations
Social Relations Model
adolescencia
apego
modelo de relaciones sociales
relación familiar
依恋
家庭关系
社会关系模型
青春期
Journal
Family process
ISSN: 1545-5300
Titre abrégé: Fam Process
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0400666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
25
5
2021
medline:
7
6
2022
entrez:
24
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While attachment at an early age is almost exclusively determined by parental behavior, variation in the quality of attachment in adolescence seems strong to be influenced by the complex interplay between the adolescent's internal working model and its environment. To unravel the different sources of variance in adolescent attachment relationships we applied the Social Relations Model. Two parents and two adolescents from 70 relatively well-functioning families reported on their attachment relationships within a family context. In this study, attachment was conceptualized by two different dimensions of attachment, namely anxiety (for being abandoned) and avoidance (of intimacy). Our findings suggest adolescents experience little attachment anxiety throughout adolescence, but they report significantly more attachment avoidance toward their parents. The variance in the quality of adolescents' attachment relationships was mainly determined by characteristics of the adolescent and the unique adjustments they make to the attachment figure. Si bien el apego en los primeros años de vida está casi exclusivamente determinado por la conducta de los padres, la variación de la calidad del apego en la adolescencia parece significativamente influenciada por la interacción compleja entre el modelo de funcionamiento interno del adolescente y su entorno. Para descifrar las diferentes fuentes de varianza en las relaciones de apego de los adolescentes, aplicamos el modelo de relaciones sociales. Dos padres y dos adolescentes de 70 familias con un funcionamiento relativamente bueno informaron sobre sus relaciones de apego dentro de un contexto familiar. En este estudio, el apego se conceptualizó mediante dos aspectos diferentes del apego, por ejemplo, la ansiedad (por ser abandonado) y la evitación (de la intimidad). Nuestros resultados sugieren que los adolescentes sufren poca ansiedad por el apego durante la adolescencia, pero informan una evitación del apego más significativa hacia sus padres. La varianza en la calidad de las relaciones de apego de los adolescentes estuvo determinada principalmente por las características del adolescente y por las adaptaciones únicas que hace a la figura de apego. 虽然幼儿阶段的依恋几乎完全由父母的行为决定，但青春期的依恋其质量的差异似乎更强烈地受到青少年自身内部的工作模式和所处环境两者之间复杂的相互作用的影响。为了弄清楚导致青少年依恋关系之差异的各种不同的来源，我们运用了社会关系模型。研究对象来自70个相对正常家庭，每位家庭都有两位父母和两位青少年参与研究，他们报告了他们在家庭环境中的依恋关系。本研究将依恋定义为两个不同维度，即焦虑(因为被忽视)和回避(亲密)。本研究结果表明，青少年在整个青春期很少经历依恋焦虑，但他们对父母回避与其亲密依恋关系倒是明显得多。青少年依恋关系在质量方面的差异主要由青少年自身的特点及其对他们依恋的人所作出的独别的调整决定的。.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(spa)
Si bien el apego en los primeros años de vida está casi exclusivamente determinado por la conducta de los padres, la variación de la calidad del apego en la adolescencia parece significativamente influenciada por la interacción compleja entre el modelo de funcionamiento interno del adolescente y su entorno. Para descifrar las diferentes fuentes de varianza en las relaciones de apego de los adolescentes, aplicamos el modelo de relaciones sociales. Dos padres y dos adolescentes de 70 familias con un funcionamiento relativamente bueno informaron sobre sus relaciones de apego dentro de un contexto familiar. En este estudio, el apego se conceptualizó mediante dos aspectos diferentes del apego, por ejemplo, la ansiedad (por ser abandonado) y la evitación (de la intimidad). Nuestros resultados sugieren que los adolescentes sufren poca ansiedad por el apego durante la adolescencia, pero informan una evitación del apego más significativa hacia sus padres. La varianza en la calidad de las relaciones de apego de los adolescentes estuvo determinada principalmente por las características del adolescente y por las adaptaciones únicas que hace a la figura de apego.
Type: Publisher
(chi)
虽然幼儿阶段的依恋几乎完全由父母的行为决定，但青春期的依恋其质量的差异似乎更强烈地受到青少年自身内部的工作模式和所处环境两者之间复杂的相互作用的影响。为了弄清楚导致青少年依恋关系之差异的各种不同的来源，我们运用了社会关系模型。研究对象来自70个相对正常家庭，每位家庭都有两位父母和两位青少年参与研究，他们报告了他们在家庭环境中的依恋关系。本研究将依恋定义为两个不同维度，即焦虑(因为被忽视)和回避(亲密)。本研究结果表明，青少年在整个青春期很少经历依恋焦虑，但他们对父母回避与其亲密依恋关系倒是明显得多。青少年依恋关系在质量方面的差异主要由青少年自身的特点及其对他们依恋的人所作出的独别的调整决定的。.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
764-778Informations de copyright
© 2021 Family Process Institute.
Références
Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 profile. University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2003). Manual for the ASEBA adult forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M., & Stayton, D. F. (1974). Infant-mother attachment and social development: Socialization as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In M. P. M. Richards (Ed.), The integration of a child into a social world (pp. 99-135). Cambridge University Press.
Allen, J. P., & Tan, J. S. (2016). The multiple faces of attachment in adolescence. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 399-415). The Guilford Press.
Bentler, P. M. (1983). Theory and implementation of EQS, a structural equations program. BMDP Statistical Software.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Hogarth Press.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. Routledge.
Brennan, P. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrated overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). The Guilford Press.
Brenning, K., Soenens, B., Braet, C., & Bosmans, G. (2011). An adaptation of the experiences in close relationships scale-revised for use with children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(8), 1048-1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511402418
Brenning, K. M., Soenens, B., Braet, C., & Bosmans, G. (2012). Attachment and depressive symptoms in middle childhood and early adolescence: Testing the validity of the emotion regulation model of attachment. Personal Relationships, 19(3), 445-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01372.x
Buist, K. L., Deković, M., Meeus, W. H., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2004). Attachment in adolescence: A social relations model analysis. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(6), 826-850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403260109
Coesens, C., De Mol, J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Buysse, A. (2010). The role of interpersonal influence in families in understanding children’s eating behavior: A social relations model analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(8), 1267-1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310369187
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053-1073.
Cook, W. L. (1993). Interdependence and the interpersonal sense of control - An analysis of family relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 587-601. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.4.587
Cook, W. L. (1994). A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 500-509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.62.3.500
Cook, W. L. (2000). Understanding attachment security in family context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.285
Cook, W., & Dreyer, A. (1984). The Social Relations Model: A new approach to the analysis of family-dyadic interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 46(3), 679-687. https://doi.org/10.2307/352609
Doyle, A. B., Lawford, H., & Markiewicz, D. (2009). Attachment style with mother, father, best friend, and romantic partner during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence., 19, 690-714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00617.x
Doyle, A. B., & Markiewicz, D. (2005). Parenting, marital conflict and adjustment from early- to mid-adolescence: Mediated by adolescent attachment style? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(2), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-3209-7
Eichelsheim, V. I., Buist, K. L., Deković, M., Cook, W. L., Manders, W., Branje, S. J. T., Frijns, T., Van Lier, P. A. C., Koot, H. M., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2011). Negativity in problematic and nonproblematic families: A multigroup social relations model analysis with structured means. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(1), 152-156. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022450
Eichelsheim, V. I., Deković, M., Buist, K. L., & Cook, W. L. (2009). The social relations model in family studies: A systematic review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 1052-1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00652.x
Fearon, P., Shmueli-Goetz, Y., Viding, E., Fonagy, P., & Plomin, R. (2014). Genetic and environmental influences on adolescent attachment. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 55(9), 1033-1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12171
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350-365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (1990). Analysis of family research designs: A model of interdependence. Communication Research, 17(4), 462-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017004004
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. The Guilford Press.
Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 141-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60144-6
Lewis, M. (2005). The child and its family: The social network model. Human Development, 48(1-2), 8-27. https://doi.org/10.1159/000083213
Markiewicz, D., Lawford, H., Doyle, A. B., & Haggart, N. (2006). Developmental differences in adolescents’ and young adults’ use of mothers, fathers, best friends, and romantic partners to fulfill attachment needs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9014-5
McCormick, C. B., & Kennedy, J. H. (1994). Parent-child attachment working models and self-esteem in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537139
Roisman, G. I., & Fraley, R. C. (2008). A behavior-genetic study of parenting quality, infant attachment security, and their covariation in a nationally representative sample. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 831-839. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.831
Rosenthal, N. L., & Kobak, R. (2010). Assessing adolescents' attachment hierarchies: Differences across developmental periods and associations with individual adaptation. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(3), 678-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00655.x
Seibert, A. C., & Kerns, K. A. (2009). Attachment figures in middle childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(4), 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409103872
Stas, L., Schönbrodt, F., & Loeys, T. (2015). Getting the most out of family data with the R package fSRM. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(2), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000058
Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the May annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
Van Petegem, S., Beyers, W., Brenning, K., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Exploring the association between insecure attachment and adolescent autonomy in family decision making: A differentiated approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1837-1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9886-0
Van Petegem, S., Vansteenkiste, M., & Beyers, W. (2013). The jingle-jangle fallacy in adolescent autonomy in the family: In search of an underlying structure. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 994-1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9847-7
Vanwalleghem, E., & Loeys, T. (2013). Power analyses for the social relations model (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:002061346
Whiteman, S. D., McHale, S. M., & Soli, A. (2011). Theoretical perspectives on sibling relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3(2), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00087.x