Moving online: young people and parents' experiences of adolescent eating disorder day programme treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Adolescents Anorexia nervosa Covid-19 pandemic Day programme Online therapy Partial hospitalisation program (PHP)

Journal

Journal of eating disorders
ISSN: 2050-2974
Titre abrégé: J Eat Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101610672

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 May 2021
Historique:
received: 03 04 2021
accepted: 05 05 2021
entrez: 25 5 2021
pubmed: 26 5 2021
medline: 26 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study examined the experiences of young people and their parents who attended an intensive day treatment programme for eating disorders online during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Online questionnaires were completed by 14 adolescents (12-18 years) and their parents (n = 19). The questionnaires included a mixture of rating questions (Likert scale) and free text responses. Free text responses were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three main themes were identified: 1) New discoveries, 2) Lost in translation and 3) The best of a bad situation. This study provides insight into the benefits and pitfalls of online treatment delivery in the adolescent day programme context, which has rapidly had to become part of the everyday therapeutic practice. Results indicate that there are advantages and disadvantages to this, and that parents and young people's views differed. This study suggests that the increased accessibility provided by online working does not necessarily translate to increased connection. Given the importance of therapeutic alliance in treatment outcomes, this will be an important consideration for future developments of online intensive treatments. This study examined the experiences of young people and their parents who attended an intensive day treatment programme for anorexia online during the COVID-19 pandemic. Online questionnaires were completed by 14 patients aged 12–18 years and 19 of their parents. The questionnaires included a mixture of rating questions (for example: How would you rate your experience with online therapy from 1 to 10?) and free text responses. The authors explored the free text responses and identified three common themes. These were 1) New discoveries- for the parents and young people, online therapy was a new experience, 2) Lost in translation- working online meant some aspects of communication were lost, 3) The best of a bad situation- online therapy was better than no therapy at all. This study provides insight into the benefits and pitfalls of online therapy in a day programme setting. Specifically, this study suggests that the increased accessibility provided by online working, does not necessarily translate to increased connection. Given the importance of building a positive and trusting relationship between the young person, their family and their therapist, this will be an important consideration when thinking about future development of online treatment programmes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This study examined the experiences of young people and their parents who attended an intensive day treatment programme for eating disorders online during the global COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS METHODS
Online questionnaires were completed by 14 adolescents (12-18 years) and their parents (n = 19). The questionnaires included a mixture of rating questions (Likert scale) and free text responses. Free text responses were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Three main themes were identified: 1) New discoveries, 2) Lost in translation and 3) The best of a bad situation. This study provides insight into the benefits and pitfalls of online treatment delivery in the adolescent day programme context, which has rapidly had to become part of the everyday therapeutic practice. Results indicate that there are advantages and disadvantages to this, and that parents and young people's views differed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that the increased accessibility provided by online working does not necessarily translate to increased connection. Given the importance of therapeutic alliance in treatment outcomes, this will be an important consideration for future developments of online intensive treatments.
This study examined the experiences of young people and their parents who attended an intensive day treatment programme for anorexia online during the COVID-19 pandemic. Online questionnaires were completed by 14 patients aged 12–18 years and 19 of their parents. The questionnaires included a mixture of rating questions (for example: How would you rate your experience with online therapy from 1 to 10?) and free text responses. The authors explored the free text responses and identified three common themes. These were 1) New discoveries- for the parents and young people, online therapy was a new experience, 2) Lost in translation- working online meant some aspects of communication were lost, 3) The best of a bad situation- online therapy was better than no therapy at all. This study provides insight into the benefits and pitfalls of online therapy in a day programme setting. Specifically, this study suggests that the increased accessibility provided by online working, does not necessarily translate to increased connection. Given the importance of building a positive and trusting relationship between the young person, their family and their therapist, this will be an important consideration when thinking about future development of online treatment programmes.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
This study examined the experiences of young people and their parents who attended an intensive day treatment programme for anorexia online during the COVID-19 pandemic. Online questionnaires were completed by 14 patients aged 12–18 years and 19 of their parents. The questionnaires included a mixture of rating questions (for example: How would you rate your experience with online therapy from 1 to 10?) and free text responses. The authors explored the free text responses and identified three common themes. These were 1) New discoveries- for the parents and young people, online therapy was a new experience, 2) Lost in translation- working online meant some aspects of communication were lost, 3) The best of a bad situation- online therapy was better than no therapy at all. This study provides insight into the benefits and pitfalls of online therapy in a day programme setting. Specifically, this study suggests that the increased accessibility provided by online working, does not necessarily translate to increased connection. Given the importance of building a positive and trusting relationship between the young person, their family and their therapist, this will be an important consideration when thinking about future development of online treatment programmes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34030737
doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00418-4
pii: 10.1186/s40337-021-00418-4
pmc: PMC8142071
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

62

Références

J Eat Disord. 2021 Jan 19;9(1):14
pubmed: 33468242
Eat Behav. 2014 Aug;15(3):464-77
pubmed: 25064301
Fam Process. 2016 Sep;55(3):577-94
pubmed: 27543373
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Jul;53(7):1132-1141
pubmed: 32383530
Psychol Med. 2015 Jan;45(2):415-27
pubmed: 25017941
Psychother Res. 2017 Sep;27(5):511-524
pubmed: 26732852
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Nov;51(11):1261-1269
pubmed: 30265750
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 02;20(2):e25
pubmed: 29396387
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6S):S89-S99
pubmed: 32446614
Lancet. 2014 Apr 5;383(9924):1222-9
pubmed: 24439238
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011 Mar;48(1):17-24
pubmed: 21401270
J Eat Disord. 2020 Nov 13;8(1):68
pubmed: 33292696
J Psychol. 2012 Jan-Apr;146(1-2):243-57
pubmed: 22303623
Br J Psychiatry. 1991 Sep;159:325-33
pubmed: 1958942
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 29;12:652604
pubmed: 33995149
Int J Eat Disord. 2012 Mar;45(2):214-21
pubmed: 21374692
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Nov;25(6):797-808
pubmed: 30014606
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Mar;14(15):1-98
pubmed: 20334748
J Eat Disord. 2021 Mar 9;9(1):34
pubmed: 33750463
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020 Nov;28(6):789-795
pubmed: 32844501
Int J Eat Disord. 2019 Apr;52(4):481-487
pubmed: 30520532
Int J Eat Disord. 2000 May;27(4):381-9
pubmed: 10744844

Auteurs

Phillipa Louise Brothwood (PL)

Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders (MCCAED), Maudsley Hospital, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.

Julian Baudinet (J)

Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders (MCCAED), Maudsley Hospital, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK. Julian.Baudinet@kcl.ac.uk.
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK. Julian.Baudinet@kcl.ac.uk.

Catherine S Stewart (CS)

Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders (MCCAED), Maudsley Hospital, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.

Mima Simic (M)

Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders (MCCAED), Maudsley Hospital, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.

Classifications MeSH