Web-Based Peer Support Interventions for Adults Living With Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review.

chronic conditions online peer support scoping review self-management

Journal

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies
ISSN: 2369-2529
Titre abrégé: JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101703412

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 May 2021
Historique:
received: 08 04 2019
accepted: 17 04 2021
revised: 27 10 2020
entrez: 25 5 2021
pubmed: 26 5 2021
medline: 26 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Globally, 1 in 3 adults live with multiple chronic conditions. Thus, effective interventions are needed to prevent and manage these chronic conditions and to reduce the associated health care costs. Teaching effective self-management practices to people with chronic diseases is one strategy to address the burden of chronic conditions. With the increasing availability of and access to the internet, the implementation of web-based peer support programs has become increasingly common. The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize existing literature and key characteristics of web-based peer support programs for persons with chronic conditions. This scoping review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Chronic diseases identified by the Public Health Agency of Canada were included. Our review was limited to peer support interventions delivered on the web. Peers providing support had to have the chronic condition that they were providing support for. The information abstracted included the year of publication, country of study, purpose of the study, participant population, key characteristics of the intervention, outcome measures, and results. After duplicates were removed, 12,641 articles were screened. Data abstraction was completed for 41 articles. There was a lack of participant diversity in the included studies, specifically with respect to the conditions studied. There was a lack of studies with older participants aged ≥70 years. There was inconsistency in how the interventions were described in terms of the duration and frequency of the interventions. Informational, emotional, and appraisal support were implemented in the studied interventions. Few studies used a randomized controlled trial design. A total of 4 of the 6 randomized controlled trials reported positive and significant results, including decreased emotional distress and increased health service navigation, self-efficacy, social participation, and constructive attitudes and approaches. Among the qualitative studies included in this review, there were several positive experiences related to participating in a web-based peer support intervention, including increased compassion and improved attitudes toward the individual's chronic condition, access to information, and empowerment. There is limited recent, high-level evidence on web-based peer support interventions. Where evidence exists, significant improvements in social participation, self-efficacy, and health-directed activity were demonstrated. Some studies incorporated a theoretical framework, and all forms of peer support-emotional, informational, and appraisal support-were identified in the studies included in this review. We recommend further research on web-based peer support in more diverse patient groups (eg, for older adults and chronic conditions outside of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and HIV or AIDS). Key gaps in the area of web-based peer support will serve to inform the development and implementation of future programs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Globally, 1 in 3 adults live with multiple chronic conditions. Thus, effective interventions are needed to prevent and manage these chronic conditions and to reduce the associated health care costs. Teaching effective self-management practices to people with chronic diseases is one strategy to address the burden of chronic conditions. With the increasing availability of and access to the internet, the implementation of web-based peer support programs has become increasingly common.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize existing literature and key characteristics of web-based peer support programs for persons with chronic conditions.
METHODS METHODS
This scoping review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Chronic diseases identified by the Public Health Agency of Canada were included. Our review was limited to peer support interventions delivered on the web. Peers providing support had to have the chronic condition that they were providing support for. The information abstracted included the year of publication, country of study, purpose of the study, participant population, key characteristics of the intervention, outcome measures, and results.
RESULTS RESULTS
After duplicates were removed, 12,641 articles were screened. Data abstraction was completed for 41 articles. There was a lack of participant diversity in the included studies, specifically with respect to the conditions studied. There was a lack of studies with older participants aged ≥70 years. There was inconsistency in how the interventions were described in terms of the duration and frequency of the interventions. Informational, emotional, and appraisal support were implemented in the studied interventions. Few studies used a randomized controlled trial design. A total of 4 of the 6 randomized controlled trials reported positive and significant results, including decreased emotional distress and increased health service navigation, self-efficacy, social participation, and constructive attitudes and approaches. Among the qualitative studies included in this review, there were several positive experiences related to participating in a web-based peer support intervention, including increased compassion and improved attitudes toward the individual's chronic condition, access to information, and empowerment.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
There is limited recent, high-level evidence on web-based peer support interventions. Where evidence exists, significant improvements in social participation, self-efficacy, and health-directed activity were demonstrated. Some studies incorporated a theoretical framework, and all forms of peer support-emotional, informational, and appraisal support-were identified in the studies included in this review. We recommend further research on web-based peer support in more diverse patient groups (eg, for older adults and chronic conditions outside of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and HIV or AIDS). Key gaps in the area of web-based peer support will serve to inform the development and implementation of future programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34032572
pii: v8i2e14321
doi: 10.2196/14321
pmc: PMC8188320
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

e14321

Informations de copyright

©Saima N Hossain, Susan B Jaglal, John Shepherd, Laure Perrier, Jennifer R Tomasone, Shane N Sweet, Dorothy Luong, Sonya Allin, Michelle L A Nelson, Sara J T Guilcher, Sarah E P Munce. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 25.05.2021.

Références

J Neurosci Nurs. 2013 Jun;45(3):E3-14
pubmed: 23636073
Diabet Med. 2018 Feb;35(2):232-241
pubmed: 29171071
AIDS Behav. 2016 Sep;20(9):1907-18
pubmed: 26896121
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 23;19(5):e175
pubmed: 28536093
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2001 Sep;24(1):60-77
pubmed: 11554534
J Health Commun. 2017 Jun;22(6):469-476
pubmed: 28414570
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):321-32
pubmed: 12605954
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2015 Mar;4(1):44-9
pubmed: 26812430
Health Commun. 2017 Mar;32(3):269-278
pubmed: 27218836
J Pediatr Psychol. 2017 Oct 1;42(9):962-969
pubmed: 28340203
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):279
pubmed: 31640576
Health Expect. 2009 Sep;12(3):313-20
pubmed: 19555377
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Dec;11(6):658-669
pubmed: 28470506
Comput Inform Nurs. 2014 Mar;32(3):118-26; quiz 127-8
pubmed: 24335490
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Dec;6(4):568-572
pubmed: 28581346
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Oct;26(10):3489-3496
pubmed: 29693203
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 May 06;10:161-168
pubmed: 30035241
Birth. 2006 Jun;33(2):139-46
pubmed: 16732780
Aust Health Rev. 2008 Aug;32(3):468-78
pubmed: 18666874
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Feb 16;6:137-143
pubmed: 28316909
Popul Health Manag. 2017 Feb;20(1):23-30
pubmed: 27563751
Sex Relation Ther. 2014 Nov 1;29(4):467-475
pubmed: 25642144
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Mar;16(3):194-200
pubmed: 28240140
AIDS Care. 2016 Jul;28(7):898-903
pubmed: 27098208
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):1088-1095
pubmed: 28718928
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;38(5):348-53
pubmed: 26166421
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Nov;8(6):1185-92
pubmed: 25212580
Health Commun. 2016;31(5):596-605
pubmed: 26453480
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3601
pubmed: 26943760
Health Serv Manage Res. 2009 Aug;22(3):136-9
pubmed: 19633182
Urol Oncol. 2017 Feb;35(2):37.e19-37.e28
pubmed: 27810256
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Sep 1;5(1):e000328
pubmed: 29225890
J Health Commun. 2012;17(2):125-40
pubmed: 22004055
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Aug 15;72(5):565-71
pubmed: 27046267
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:38
pubmed: 22531013
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Dec;10(4):248-51
pubmed: 21764386
Front Public Health. 2016 Aug 02;4:159
pubmed: 27532034
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Mar;37(2):179-85
pubmed: 24090378
J Health Psychol. 2014 Dec;19(12):1613-25
pubmed: 23988679
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 May;12(3):712-718
pubmed: 29310448
Health Psychol. 2006 Jul;25(4):462-73
pubmed: 16846321
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Apr 3;7(4):e16460
pubmed: 32243256
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Jun;42(6):613-30
pubmed: 15081880
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 06;6(4):e010501
pubmed: 27053271
Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Apr;34(4):288-9
pubmed: 15861755
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 3;159(5):318-24
pubmed: 24026317
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Feb 1;74 Suppl 2:S121-S127
pubmed: 28079722
Chronic Illn. 2016 Jun;12(2):116-44
pubmed: 26304692
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jun 22;3(3):e000874
pubmed: 29989034
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):472-9
pubmed: 23928354
Rehabil Psychol. 2012 Aug;57(3):196-206
pubmed: 22946607
Int Nurs Rev. 2012 Sep;59(3):345-52
pubmed: 22897185
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 03;4:310
pubmed: 23750148
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e017999
pubmed: 28947464
Cancer Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;38(5):E21-31
pubmed: 25254411
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2012 Jul-Aug;37(4):241-6
pubmed: 22739480
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015;11(4):261-72
pubmed: 25901500
Int J MS Care. 2017 Nov-Dec;19(6):323-328
pubmed: 29270090
CMAJ. 2014 Oct 21;186(15):E568-78
pubmed: 25225226
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Jul;40(4):435-443
pubmed: 24723130

Auteurs

Saima N Hossain (SN)

Toronto Rehabilitation Insititute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Susan B Jaglal (SB)

Toronto Rehabilitation Insititute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

John Shepherd (J)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Laure Perrier (L)

University of Toronto Libraries, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Jennifer R Tomasone (JR)

School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Shane N Sweet (SN)

School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Dorothy Luong (D)

Toronto Rehabilitation Insititute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Sonya Allin (S)

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Michelle L A Nelson (MLA)

Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Sara J T Guilcher (SJT)

Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Sarah E P Munce (SEP)

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - Rumsey Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH