Sub-national analysis and determinants of numbers of antenatal care contacts in Nigeria: assessing the compliance with the WHO recommended standard guidelines.
Adolescent
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Geography
/ statistics & numerical data
Guideline Adherence
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Services Accessibility
Health Surveys
Humans
Middle Aged
Nigeria
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pregnancy
Prenatal Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Socioeconomic Factors
World Health Organization
Young Adult
ANC contacts
Antenatal care
Education
Nigeria
WHO guidelines
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 May 2021
25 May 2021
Historique:
received:
09
12
2020
accepted:
26
04
2021
entrez:
26
5
2021
pubmed:
27
5
2021
medline:
9
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nigeria has unimpressive maternal and child health indicators. Compliance with the WHO guidelines on the minimum number of antenatal care (ANC) contacts could improve these indicators. We assessed the compliance with WHO recommended standards on ANC contacts in Nigeria and identify the associated factors. Nationally representative cross-sectional data during pregnancy of 21,785 most recent births within five years preceding the 2018 Nigeria Demographic Health Survey was used. The number of ANC contacts was categorised into "None", "1-3", "4-7" and "8 or more" contacts based on subsequent WHO guidelines. Descriptive statistics, bivariable and multivariable multinomial logistic regression was used at p = 0.05. About 25 % of the women had no ANC contact, 58 % had at least 4 contacts while only 20 % had 8 or more ANC contacts. The highest rate of 8 or more ANC contacts was in Osun (80.2 %), Lagos (76.8 %), and Imo (72.0 %) while the lowest rates were in Kebbi (0.2 %), Zamfara (1.1 %) and Yobe (1.3 %). Respondents with higher education were twelve times (adjusted relative risk (aRR): 12.46, 95 % CI: 7.33-21.2), having secondary education was thrice (aRR: 2.91, 95 % CI: 2.35-3.60), and having primary education was twice (aRR: 2.17, 95 % CI: 1.77-2.66) more likely to make at least 8 contacts than those with no education. Respondents from households in the richest and middle wealth categories were 129 and 67 % more likely to make 8 or more ANC contacts compared to those from households in the lowest wealth category respectively. The likelihood of making 8 ANC contacts was 89 and 47 % higher among respondents from communities in the least and middle disadvantaged groups, respectively, compared to the most disadvantaged group. Other significant variables were spouse education, health care decision making, media access, ethnicity, religion, and other community factors. Compliance with WHO guidelines on the minimum number of ANC contacts in Nigeria is poor. Thus, Nigeria has a long walk to attaining sustainable development goal's targets on child and maternal health. We recommend that the maternal and child health programmers should review existing policies and develop new policies to adopt, implement and tackle the challenges of adherence to the WHO recommended minimum of 8 ANC contacts. Women's education, socioeconomic status and adequate mobilization of families should be prioritized. There is a need for urgent intervention to narrow the identified inequalities and substantial disparities in the characteristics of pregnant women across the regions and states.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Nigeria has unimpressive maternal and child health indicators. Compliance with the WHO guidelines on the minimum number of antenatal care (ANC) contacts could improve these indicators. We assessed the compliance with WHO recommended standards on ANC contacts in Nigeria and identify the associated factors.
METHODS
METHODS
Nationally representative cross-sectional data during pregnancy of 21,785 most recent births within five years preceding the 2018 Nigeria Demographic Health Survey was used. The number of ANC contacts was categorised into "None", "1-3", "4-7" and "8 or more" contacts based on subsequent WHO guidelines. Descriptive statistics, bivariable and multivariable multinomial logistic regression was used at p = 0.05.
RESULTS
RESULTS
About 25 % of the women had no ANC contact, 58 % had at least 4 contacts while only 20 % had 8 or more ANC contacts. The highest rate of 8 or more ANC contacts was in Osun (80.2 %), Lagos (76.8 %), and Imo (72.0 %) while the lowest rates were in Kebbi (0.2 %), Zamfara (1.1 %) and Yobe (1.3 %). Respondents with higher education were twelve times (adjusted relative risk (aRR): 12.46, 95 % CI: 7.33-21.2), having secondary education was thrice (aRR: 2.91, 95 % CI: 2.35-3.60), and having primary education was twice (aRR: 2.17, 95 % CI: 1.77-2.66) more likely to make at least 8 contacts than those with no education. Respondents from households in the richest and middle wealth categories were 129 and 67 % more likely to make 8 or more ANC contacts compared to those from households in the lowest wealth category respectively. The likelihood of making 8 ANC contacts was 89 and 47 % higher among respondents from communities in the least and middle disadvantaged groups, respectively, compared to the most disadvantaged group. Other significant variables were spouse education, health care decision making, media access, ethnicity, religion, and other community factors.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Compliance with WHO guidelines on the minimum number of ANC contacts in Nigeria is poor. Thus, Nigeria has a long walk to attaining sustainable development goal's targets on child and maternal health. We recommend that the maternal and child health programmers should review existing policies and develop new policies to adopt, implement and tackle the challenges of adherence to the WHO recommended minimum of 8 ANC contacts. Women's education, socioeconomic status and adequate mobilization of families should be prioritized. There is a need for urgent intervention to narrow the identified inequalities and substantial disparities in the characteristics of pregnant women across the regions and states.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34034680
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03837-y
pii: 10.1186/s12884-021-03837-y
pmc: PMC8152343
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
402Références
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 25;15(9):e0239855
pubmed: 32976494
Health Care Women Int. 2011 May;32(5):441-52
pubmed: 21476162
Reprod Health. 2014;11 Suppl 1:S2
pubmed: 25178042
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 17;15:95
pubmed: 25885481
Int J Womens Health. 2017 Nov 21;9:843-853
pubmed: 29200892
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Mar 03;26:124
pubmed: 28533847
PLoS One. 2018 May 21;13(5):e0197324
pubmed: 29782511
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Jun 07;10:13
pubmed: 20529249
Glob Public Health. 2017 Jun;12(6):711-727
pubmed: 28441926
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0204752
pubmed: 30261046
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):765
pubmed: 29921275
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):
pubmed: 32565442
PLoS One. 2015 May 05;10(5):e0123940
pubmed: 25942018
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):368
pubmed: 29554885
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 2;14(10):e0222177
pubmed: 31577797
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152167
pubmed: 27010482
Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 16;4:127
pubmed: 27379228
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Mar 14;7(5):849-855
pubmed: 30962850
Health Care Women Int. 2017 Jan;38(1):17-37
pubmed: 27537979
Int J Womens Health. 2017 Oct 30;9:807-819
pubmed: 29133984
J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10
pubmed: 7738325
Cad Saude Publica. 2014 May;30(5):1079-92
pubmed: 24936823
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):327
pubmed: 31488080
Niger Med J. 2014 May;55(3):235-41
pubmed: 25013256
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46475
pubmed: 23056319
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 30;6:2333392819866620
pubmed: 31392259
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):781
pubmed: 32831074
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e017122
pubmed: 29146636
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 11;17(1):300
pubmed: 28893222
Int Health. 2021 Feb 24;13(2):122-129
pubmed: 32530041