Identifying nootropic drug targets via large-scale cognitive GWAS and transcriptomics.
Journal
Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology
ISSN: 1740-634X
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychopharmacology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8904907
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
23
10
2020
accepted:
12
04
2021
revised:
22
02
2021
pubmed:
27
5
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
entrez:
26
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Broad-based cognitive deficits are an enduring and disabling symptom for many patients with severe mental illness, and these impairments are inadequately addressed by current medications. While novel drug targets for schizophrenia and depression have emerged from recent large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of these psychiatric disorders, GWAS of general cognitive ability can suggest potential targets for nootropic drug repurposing. Here, we (1) meta-analyze results from two recent cognitive GWAS to further enhance power for locus discovery; (2) employ several complementary transcriptomic methods to identify genes in these loci that are credibly associated with cognition; and (3) further annotate the resulting genes using multiple chemoinformatic databases to identify "druggable" targets. Using our meta-analytic data set (N = 373,617), we identified 241 independent cognition-associated loci (29 novel), and 76 genes were identified by 2 or more methods of gene identification. Actin and chromatin binding gene sets were identified as novel pathways that could be targeted via drug repurposing. Leveraging our transcriptomic and chemoinformatic databases, we identified 16 putative genes targeted by existing drugs potentially available for cognitive repurposing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34035472
doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01023-4
pii: 10.1038/s41386-021-01023-4
pmc: PMC8357785
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nootropic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1788-1801Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K99 AG054573
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0700704
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC55222
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC25195
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG049789
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U54 HD090255
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : RL1 MH083269
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC85081
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0700704/84698
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH085018
Pays : United States
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : CZB/4/505
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : P50 MH080173
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : RC2 MH089924
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH117646
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC85080
Pays : United States
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : 15/S18386
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000124
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K026992/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R00 AG054573
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K01 MH098126
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG023629
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K01 MH085812
Pays : United States
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/F019394/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K23 MH077807
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL080295
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T030852/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC65226
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201200036C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : RC2 MH089983
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH079800
Pays : United States
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : CZH/4/213
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : CZG/3/2/79
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC85082
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH080912
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N02 HL64278
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201500001I
Pays : United States
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : ETM/55
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC85079
Pays : United States
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA033369
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC85083
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC85086
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U01 MH103340
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : PL1 MH083271
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : UL1 DE019580
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : N01HC75150
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : UL1 RR033176
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH110920
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : PL1 NS062410
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH092515
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : RL1 DA024853
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U01 DA024417
Pays : United States
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : 15/SAG09977
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268200800007C
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
King EA, Davis JW, Degner JF. Are drug targets with genetic support twice as likely to be approved? Revised estimates of the impact of genetic support for drug mechanisms on the probability of drug approval. PLoS Genet. 2019;15:e1008489.
pubmed: 31830040
pmcid: 6907751
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008489
So H-C, Chau CK-L, Chiu W-T, Ho K-S, Lo C-P, Yim SH-Y, et al. Analysis of genome-wide association data highlights candidates for drug repositioning in psychiatry. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1342–9.
pubmed: 28805813
doi: 10.1038/nn.4618
Breen G, Li Q, Roth BL, O’Donnell P, Didriksen M, Dolmetsch R, et al. Translating genome-wide association findings into new therapeutics for psychiatry. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1392–6.
pubmed: 27786187
pmcid: 5676453
doi: 10.1038/nn.4411
Lencz T, Malhotra AK. Targeting the schizophrenia genome: a fast track strategy from GWAS to clinic. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:820–6.
pubmed: 25869805
pmcid: 4486648
doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.28
Green MJ, Girshkin L, Kremerskothen K, Watkeys O, Quidé Y. A systematic review of studies reporting data-driven cognitive subtypes across the psychosis spectrum. Neuropsychol Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09422-7 .
Sun M-K. Potential therapeutics for vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16:1036–44.
pubmed: 29046153
pmcid: 6120112
doi: 10.2174/1570159X15666171016164734
Lam M, Trampush JW, Yu J, Knowles E, Davies G, Liewald DC, et al. Large-scale cognitive GWAS meta-analysis reveals tissue-specific neural expression and potential nootropic drug targets. Cell Rep. 2017;21:2597–613.
pubmed: 29186694
pmcid: 5789458
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.028
Savage JE, Jansen PR, Stringer S, Watanabe K, Bryois J, Leeuw CAde, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence. Nat Genet. 2018;50:912–9.
pubmed: 29942086
pmcid: 6411041
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6
Davies G, Lam M, Harris SE, Trampush JW, Luciano M, Hill WD, et al. Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2098.
pubmed: 29844566
pmcid: 5974083
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04362-x
Hill WD, Marioni RE, Maghzian O, Ritchie SJ, Hagenaars SP, McIntosh AM, et al. A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:169–81.
pubmed: 29326435
doi: 10.1038/s41380-017-0001-5
Deary IJ, Harris SE, Hill WD. What genome-wide association studies reveal about the association between intelligence and physical health, illness, and mortality. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018;27:6–12.
pubmed: 30071465
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.07.005
Hill WD, Harris SE, Deary IJ. What genome-wide association studies reveal about the association between intelligence and mental health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018;27:25–30.
pubmed: 30110665
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.07.007
Lam M, Hill WD, Trampush JW, Yu J, Knowles E, Davies G, et al. Pleiotropic meta-analysis of cognition, education, and schizophrenia differentiates roles of early neurodevelopmental and adult synaptic pathways. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105:334–50.
pubmed: 31374203
pmcid: 6699140
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.012
Gaspar HA, Breen G. Drug enrichment and discovery from schizophrenia genome-wide association results: an analysis and visualisation approach. Sci Rep. 2017;7:12460.
pubmed: 28963561
pmcid: 5622077
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12325-3
PsychENCODE Consortium. Revealing the brain’s molecular architecture. Science. 2018;362:1262–3.
doi: 10.1126/science.362.6420.1262
Qi T, Wu Y, Zeng J, Zhang F, Xue A, Jiang L, et al. Identifying gene targets for brain-related traits using transcriptomic and methylomic data from blood. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2282.
pubmed: 29891976
pmcid: 5995828
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04558-1
GTEx Consortium, Laboratory, Data Analysis &Coordinating Center (LDACC)—Analysis Working Group, Statistical Methods groups—Analysis Working Group, Enhancing GTEx (eGTEx) groups, NIH Common Fund, NIH/NCI. et al. Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature. 2017;550:204–13.
Fromer M, Roussos P, Sieberts SK, Johnson JS, Kavanagh DH, Perumal TM, et al. Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1442–53.
pubmed: 27668389
pmcid: 5083142
doi: 10.1038/nn.4399
Ng B, White CC, Klein H-U, Sieberts SK, McCabe C, Patrick E, et al. An xQTL map integrates the genetic architecture of the human brain’s transcriptome and epigenome. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1418–26.
pubmed: 28869584
pmcid: 5785926
doi: 10.1038/nn.4632
Wang D, Liu S, Warrell J, Won H, Shi X, Navarro FCP, et al. Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science. 2018;362:eaat8464.
pubmed: 30545857
pmcid: 6413328
doi: 10.1126/science.aat8464
Zhu Z, Zhang F, Hu H, Bakshi A, Robinson MR, Powell JE, et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat Genet. 2016;48:481–7.
pubmed: 27019110
doi: 10.1038/ng.3538
Hopkins AL, Groom CR. The druggable genome. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1:727–30.
pubmed: 12209152
doi: 10.1038/nrd892
Sheils TK, Mathias SL, Kelleher KJ, Siramshetty VB, Nguyen D-T, Bologa CG, et al. TCRD and Pharos 2021: mining the human proteome for disease biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D1334–46.
pubmed: 33156327
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa993
Kozlovskii I, Popov P. Spatiotemporal identification of druggable binding sites using deep learning. Commun Biol. 2020;3:618.
pubmed: 33110179
pmcid: 7591901
doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01350-0
Oprea TI, Bologa CG, Brunak S, Campbell A, Gan GN, Gaulton A, et al. Unexplored therapeutic opportunities in the human genome. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:317–32.
pubmed: 29472638
pmcid: 6339563
doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.14
Pushpakom S, Iorio F, Eyers PA, Escott KJ, Hopper S, Wells A, et al. Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:41–58.
pubmed: 30310233
doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.168
Scannell JW, Blanckley A, Boldon H, Warrington B. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:191–200.
pubmed: 22378269
doi: 10.1038/nrd3681
Ruderfer DM, Charney AW, Readhead B, Kidd BA, Kähler AK, Kenny PJ, et al. Polygenic overlap between schizophrenia risk and antipsychotic response: a genomic medicine approach. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:350–7.
pubmed: 26915512
pmcid: 4982509
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00553-2
Gaspar HA, Gerring Z, Hübel C, Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Middeldorp CM, Derks EM, et al. Using genetic drug-target networks to develop new drug hypotheses for major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:117.
pubmed: 30877270
pmcid: 6420656
doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0451-4
Turley P, Walters RK, Maghzian O, Okbay A, Lee JJ, Fontana MA, et al. Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG. Nat Genet. 2018;50:229–37.
pubmed: 29292387
pmcid: 5805593
doi: 10.1038/s41588-017-0009-4
Watanabe K, Taskesen E, Bochoven A, Posthuma D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1826.
pubmed: 29184056
pmcid: 5705698
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5
Zheng J, Erzurumluoglu AM, Elsworth BL, Kemp JP, Howe L, Haycock PC, et al. LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:272–9.
pubmed: 27663502
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw613
de Leeuw CA, Mooij JM, Heskes T, Posthuma D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11:e1004219.
pubmed: 25885710
pmcid: 4401657
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219
Barbeira AN, Dickinson SP, Bonazzola R, Zheng J, Wheeler HE, Torres JM, et al. Exploring the phenotypic consequences of tissue specific gene expression variation inferred from GWAS summary statistics. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1825.
pubmed: 29739930
pmcid: 5940825
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03621-1
Finan C, Gaulton A, Kruger FA, Lumbers RT, Shah T, Engmann J, et al. The druggable genome and support for target identification and validation in drug development. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaag1166.
pubmed: 28356508
pmcid: 6321762
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1166
Corsello SM, Bittker JA, Liu Z, Gould J, McCarren P, Hirschman JE, et al. The Drug Repurposing Hub: a next-generation drug library and information resource. Nat Med. 2017;23:405–8.
pubmed: 28388612
pmcid: 5568558
doi: 10.1038/nm.4306
Trampush JW, Yang MLZ, Yu J, Knowles E, Davies G, Liewald DC, et al. GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22:336–45.
pubmed: 28093568
pmcid: 5322272
doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.244
Hagenaars SP, Harris SE, Davies G, Hill WD, Liewald DCM, Ritchie SJ, et al. Shared genetic aetiology between cognitive functions and physical and mental health in UK Biobank (N=112 151) and 24 GWAS consortia. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:1624–32.
pubmed: 26809841
pmcid: 5078856
doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.225
Hill WD, Davies G, Harris SE, Hagenaars SP, Liewald DC, Penke L, et al. Molecular genetic aetiology of general cognitive function is enriched in evolutionarily conserved regions. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e980–980.
pubmed: 27959336
pmcid: 5290340
doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.246
Dougherty JD, Schmidt EF, Nakajima M, Heintz N. Analytical approaches to RNA profiling data for the identification of genes enriched in specific cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:4218–30.
pubmed: 20308160
pmcid: 2910036
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq130
Terracciano A, Esko T, Sutin AR, de Moor MHM, Meirelles O, Zhu G, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies common variants in CTNNA2 associated with excitement-seeking. Transl Psychiatry. 2011;1:e49.
pubmed: 22833195
pmcid: 3309493
doi: 10.1038/tp.2011.42
Smith A, Bourdeau I, Wang J, Bondy CA. Expression of Catenin family members CTNNA1, CTNNA2, CTNNB1 and JUP in the primate prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005;135:225–31.
pubmed: 15857685
doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.12.025
Schaffer AE, Breuss MW, Caglayan AO, Al-Sanaa N, Al-Abdulwahed HY, Kaymakçalan H, et al. Biallelic loss of human CTNNA2, encoding αN-catenin, leads to ARP2/3 complex overactivity and disordered cortical neuronal migration. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1093–101.
pubmed: 30013181
pmcid: 6072555
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0166-0
Wang H, Eckel RH. What are lipoproteins doing in the brain? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2014;25:8–14.
pubmed: 24189266
doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2013.10.003
Wang H, Eckel RH. Lipoprotein lipase in the brain and nervous system. Annu Rev Nutr. 2012;32:147–60.
pubmed: 22540257
pmcid: 4065112
doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071811-150703
Thyme SB, Pieper LM, Li EH, Pandey S, Wang Y, Morris NS, et al. Phenotypic landscape of schizophrenia-associated genes defines candidates and their shared functions. Cell. 2019;177:478–91.e20.
pubmed: 30929901
pmcid: 6494450
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.048
Berto S, Nowick K. Species-specific changes in a primate transcription factor network provide insights into the molecular evolution of the primate prefrontal cortex. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10:2023–36.
pubmed: 30059966
pmcid: 6105097
doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy149
Qin Z, Ren F, Xu X, Ren Y, Li H, Wang Y, et al. ZNF536, a novel zinc finger protein specifically expressed in the brain, negatively regulates neuron differentiation by repressing retinoic acid-induced gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:3633–43.
pubmed: 19398580
pmcid: 2698762
doi: 10.1128/MCB.00362-09
Kang J, Park H, Kim E. IRSp53/BAIAP2 in dendritic spine development, NMDA receptor regulation, and psychiatric disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2016;100:27–39.
pubmed: 26275848
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.06.019
Bonvicini C, Faraone SV, Scassellati C. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of genetic, pharmacogenetic and biochemical studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:872–84.
pubmed: 27217152
pmcid: 5414093
doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.74
Tai G, Lu L, Wang TL, Tang BL, Goud B, Johannes L, et al. Participation of the syntaxin 5/Ykt6/GS28/GS15 SNARE complex in transport from the early/recycling endosome to the trans-Golgi network. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:4011–22.
pubmed: 15215310
pmcid: 515336
doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-12-0876
Zhao B, Luo T, Li T, Li Y, Zhang J, Shan Y, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of 19,629 individuals identifies variants influencing regional brain volumes and refines their genetic co-architecture with cognitive and mental health traits. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1637–44.
pubmed: 31676860
pmcid: 6858580
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0516-6
Lu AT, Hannon E, Levine ME, Crimmins EM, Lunnon K, Mill J, et al. Genetic architecture of epigenetic and neuronal ageing rates in human brain regions. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–14.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15353
Lencz T, Yu J, Khan RR, Carmi S, Lam M, Ben-Avraham D, et al. Novel Ultra-Rare Exonic Variants Identified in a Founder Population Implicate Cadherins in Schizophrenia. MedRxiv. 2020:2020.05.29.20115352.
Singh T, Kurki MI, Curtis D, Purcell SM, Crooks L, McRae J, et al. Rare loss-of-function variants in SETD1A are associated with schizophrenia and developmental disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:571–7.
pubmed: 26974950
pmcid: 6689268
doi: 10.1038/nn.4267
Satterstrom FK, Kosmicki JA, Wang J, Breen MS, De Rubeis S, An J-Y, et al. Large-scale exome sequencing study implicates both developmental and functional changes in the neurobiology of autism. Cell. 2020;180:568–84.e23.
pubmed: 31981491
pmcid: 7250485
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.036
De Rubeis S, He X, Goldberg AP, Poultney CS, Samocha K, Cicek AE, et al. Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature. 2014;515:209–15.
pubmed: 25363760
pmcid: 4402723
doi: 10.1038/nature13772
Vitriolo A, Gabriele M, Testa G. From enhanceropathies to the epigenetic manifold underlying human cognition. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28:R226–34.
pubmed: 31411680
pmcid: 6990140
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz196
Mula M. Topiramate and cognitive impairment: evidence and clinical implications. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012;3:279–89.
pubmed: 25083242
pmcid: 4110841
doi: 10.1177/2042098612455357
Salimzade A, Hosseini-Sharifabad A, Rabbani M. Comparative effects of chronic administrations of gabapentin, pregabalin and baclofen on rat memory using object recognition test. Res Pharm Sci. 2017;12:204–10.
pubmed: 28626478
pmcid: 5465829
doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.207201
Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Bressler J, Debette S, Schuur M, Smith AV, Bis JC, et al. GWAS for executive function and processing speed suggests involvement of the CADM2 gene. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:189–97.
pubmed: 25869804
doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.37
Debette S, Ibrahim Verbaas CA, Bressler J, Schuur M, Smith A, Bis JC, et al. Genome-wide studies of verbal declarative memory in nondemented older people: the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology consortium. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:749–63.
pubmed: 25648963
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.027
Greenwood TA, Lazzeroni LC, Maihofer AX, Swerdlow NR, Calkins ME, Freedman R, et al. Genome-wide Association of Endophenotypes for Schizophrenia From the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS) Study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:1274–84.
pubmed: 31596458
pmcid: 6802253
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2850
Wainberg M, Sinnott-Armstrong N, Mancuso N, Barbeira AN, Knowles DA, Golan D, et al. Opportunities and challenges for transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2019;51:592–9.
pubmed: 30926968
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0385-z
Mancuso N, Freund MK, Johnson R, Shi H, Kichaev G, Gusev A, et al. Probabilistic fine-mapping of transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2019;51:675–82.
pubmed: 30926970
pmcid: 6619422
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0367-1
Rajarajan P, Borrman T, Liao W, Schrode N, Flaherty E, Casiño C, et al. Neuron-specific signatures in the chromosomal connectome associated with schizophrenia risk. Science. 2018;362:eaat4311.
pubmed: 30545851
pmcid: 6408958
doi: 10.1126/science.aat4311