Suboptimal prenatal screening of
Montréal
chlamydia
gonorrhea
pregnancy
prenatal
screening
Journal
Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada
ISSN: 1188-4169
Titre abrégé: Can Commun Dis Rep
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9303729
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 May 2021
07 May 2021
Historique:
entrez:
26
5
2021
pubmed:
27
5
2021
medline:
27
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Canadian Paediatric Society no longer recommends the use of universal ocular prophylaxis with erythromycin ointment to prevent ophthalmia neonatorum. Screening for The aims of this study were to assess prenatal screening rates of The list of all women who delivered at a tertiary care hospital in Montréal, Québec, between April 2015 and March 2016, was cross-referenced with the list of samples tested for Of 2,688 mothers, 2,245 women were screened at least once, but only 2,206 women had at least one valid Suboptimal screening rates for
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Canadian Paediatric Society no longer recommends the use of universal ocular prophylaxis with erythromycin ointment to prevent ophthalmia neonatorum. Screening for
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aims of this study were to assess prenatal screening rates of
METHODS
METHODS
The list of all women who delivered at a tertiary care hospital in Montréal, Québec, between April 2015 and March 2016, was cross-referenced with the list of samples tested for
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 2,688 mothers, 2,245 women were screened at least once, but only 2,206 women had at least one valid
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Suboptimal screening rates for
Identifiants
pubmed: 34035667
doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v47i04a05
pii: 470405
pmc: PMC8127686
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
209-215Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: ACL is a member of the National Advisory Committee on STBBI (CCN-ITSS) of the Public Health Agency of Canada, as well as of the Committee on STBBI (CITSS) of the Institut national de santé publique du Québec. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of these committees.
Références
Am J Ophthalmol. 1971 Apr;71(4):861-7
pubmed: 4928532
Lancet. 1986 Nov 15;2(8516):1145-9
pubmed: 2877285
Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Mar;20(2):93-6
pubmed: 25838784
BJOG. 2016 Mar;123(4):519-28
pubmed: 26694196
JAMA. 1980 Nov 21;244(20):2291-3
pubmed: 7431552
Can J Public Health. 2016 Oct 20;107(3):e285-e290
pubmed: 27763844
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 May;82(1):14-9
pubmed: 25753079
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 23;376(8):765-773
pubmed: 28225683
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Jan;38(1):7-8
pubmed: 26872748
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):55.e1-8
pubmed: 22621817
N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 23;320(12):769-72
pubmed: 2922026
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Sep;41(9):1289-1294
pubmed: 30952625
JAMA. 2019 Jan 29;321(4):394-398
pubmed: 30694327
Prev Med. 2003 Apr;36(4):502-9
pubmed: 12649059
Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):214-21
pubmed: 11285665
Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):262-3
pubmed: 11285676