Effects of orthodontic treatment with aligners and fixed appliances on speech.
Aligner
Fixed appliance therapy
Orthodontics
Speech
Journal
The Angle orthodontist
ISSN: 1945-7103
Titre abrégé: Angle Orthod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370550
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2021
01 11 2021
Historique:
accepted:
01
03
2021
received:
01
11
2020
pubmed:
27
5
2021
medline:
5
11
2021
entrez:
26
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate effects of orthodontic treatment with aligners and conventional fixed appliances on production of speech. This was a parallel, randomized clinical trial. Patients with Angle Class I malocclusion, moderate crowding, and no speech impairment were randomly allocated to two groups: patients with orthodontic aligners (OAs; n = 20; mean age = 23.60 ± 5.65 years) and those with conventional fixed appliances (n = 20; mean age = 20.56 ± 4.51 years) and treated at the University of North Parana's clinic in Londrina, Brazil. Evaluation of speech production was performed semiobjectively by a speech therapist (myofunctional orofacial examination) and subjectively (self-assessment) at five time points: baseline, immediately after insertion of appliances, and subsequently at 3, 30, and 180 days after insertion. For intergroup comparison, independent t, χ2, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney tests were used; for intragroup comparison, the Friedman test was applied (α = 5%). In the semiobjective evaluation, patients with OAs exhibited a change in production of speech production, compared with patients with fixed appliances, immediately and 3 days after insertion of appliances (P < .001). Thirty days after insertion, the groups were similar (P = .487), an outcome that was unchanged at 180 days. However, in the self-assessments, patients in both groups reported significant speech difficulties immediately and 3 days after insertion of appliances, but such impairment was no longer perceived at 30 days or 180 days. Although the speech therapist identified changes in speech production at the start of treatment in the OA group only, patient self-assessments demonstrated that orthodontic treatment, regardless of the type of appliance used, interfered with their perception of speech.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34037699
pii: 465580
doi: 10.2319/110620-917.1
pmc: PMC8549558
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
711-717Informations de copyright
© 2021 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
Références
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Nov;110(5):535-40
pubmed: 8922513
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):747-8
pubmed: 22051497
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4 Suppl):S68-78
pubmed: 18407023
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):27-35
pubmed: 19121497
Int Orthod. 2019 Sep;17(3):513-518
pubmed: 31326368
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):302.e1-9
pubmed: 17346581
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):519-26
pubmed: 23075062
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(4):382-388
pubmed: 31842018
Eur J Oral Sci. 2016 Apr;124(2):105-18
pubmed: 26916846
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):724-30
pubmed: 21750242
Int J Orofacial Myology. 2012 Nov;38:38-77
pubmed: 23362752
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Jan 23;40(1):29-36
pubmed: 28472259
Angle Orthod. 2017 Mar;87(2):286-292
pubmed: 27557042
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Oct;39(10):744-53
pubmed: 22852833
J Orofac Orthop. 2005 Mar;66(2):162-73
pubmed: 15827703