Fostering Cultures of Sustainability in a Multi-Unit Office Building: A Theory of Change.

behavior change culture culture of sustainability engagement participation sustainability systems thinking theory of change

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 31 10 2020
accepted: 12 04 2021
entrez: 27 5 2021
pubmed: 28 5 2021
medline: 28 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Psychological approaches to fostering sustainability are heavily focused on individual behaviors and often insufficiently address the physical and social contexts individuals are embedded in. This limits the ability to create meaningful, long-lasting change, as many of day-to-day behaviors are social practices embedded in broader cultural norms and systems. This is particularly true in the work context, where organizational cultures heavily condition both the actions of individual employees and the collective actions of organizations. Thus, we argue cultures, not behaviors, must become the focus of sustainability change efforts. In this paper, we present a theory of change aimed at fostering strong organizational cultures of sustainability (COS) within a high-performance multi-tenant office building. Our theory takes a systems perspective that incorporates the social and physical aspects of the work environment, and views culture change as a co-creative exercise involving engagement of multiple stakeholders. The paper concludes with implications for practice and research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34040558
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624311
pmc: PMC8142860
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

624311

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Dreyer, Riemer, Spadafore, Marcus, Fernandes, Taylor, Whitney, Geobey and Dennett.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 30;9:1583
pubmed: 30214420
Am J Community Psychol. 2007 Jun;39(3-4):197-215
pubmed: 17510791
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Jul;39(4):248-57
pubmed: 21822859
Environ Sci Policy. 2020 Oct;112:227-235
pubmed: 32834776
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 15;739:139870
pubmed: 32544681

Auteurs

Bianca Christel Dreyer (BC)

Viessmann Centre for Engagement and Research in Sustainability, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Manuel Riemer (M)

Viessmann Centre for Engagement and Research in Sustainability, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Brittany Spadafore (B)

Viessmann Centre for Engagement and Research in Sustainability, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Joel Marcus (J)

School of Administrative Studies, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Devon Fernandes (D)

Humber College, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Allan Taylor (A)

Sustainable Waterloo Region, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Stephanie Whitney (S)

Office of Research Services, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Sean Geobey (S)

Waterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Aisling Dennett (A)

Sustainable Waterloo Region, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH