Neurophysiological Changes After Paired Brain and Spinal Cord Stimulation Coupled With Locomotor Training in Human Spinal Cord Injury.
H-reflex
locomotor training
neuromodulation
paired associative stimulation
rehabilitation
spinal cord injury
transcranial magnetic stimulation
transspinal stimulation
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
10
11
2020
accepted:
01
04
2021
entrez:
27
5
2021
pubmed:
28
5
2021
medline:
28
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Neurophysiological changes that involve activity-dependent neuroplasticity mechanisms via repeated stimulation and locomotor training are not commonly employed in research even though combination of interventions is a common clinical practice. In this randomized clinical trial, we established neurophysiological changes when transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex was paired with transcutaneous thoracolumbar spinal (transspinal) stimulation in human spinal cord injury (SCI) delivered during locomotor training. We hypothesized that TMS delivered before transspinal (TMS-transspinal) stimulation promotes functional reorganization of spinal networks during stepping. In this protocol, TMS-induced corticospinal volleys arrive at the spinal cord at a sufficient time to interact with transspinal stimulation induced depolarization of alpha motoneurons over multiple spinal segments. We further hypothesized that TMS delivered after transspinal (transspinal-TMS) stimulation induces less pronounced effects. In this protocol, transspinal stimulation is delivered at time that allows transspinal stimulation induced action potentials to arrive at the motor cortex and affect descending motor volleys at the site of their origin. Fourteen individuals with motor incomplete and complete SCI participated in at least 25 sessions. Both stimulation protocols were delivered during the stance phase of the less impaired leg. Each training session consisted of 240 paired stimuli delivered over 10-min blocks. In transspinal-TMS, the left soleus H-reflex increased during the stance-phase and the right soleus H-reflex decreased at mid-swing. In TMS-transspinal no significant changes were found. When soleus H-reflexes were grouped based on the TMS-targeted limb, transspinal-TMS and locomotor training promoted H-reflex depression at swing phase, while TMS-transspinal and locomotor training resulted in facilitation of the soleus H-reflex at stance phase of the step cycle. Furthermore, both transspinal-TMS and TMS-transspinal paired-associative stimulation (PAS) and locomotor training promoted a more physiological modulation of motor activity and thus depolarization of motoneurons during assisted stepping. Our findings support that targeted non-invasive stimulation of corticospinal and spinal neuronal pathways coupled with locomotor training produce neurophysiological changes beneficial to stepping in humans with varying deficits of sensorimotor function after SCI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34040572
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.627975
pmc: PMC8141587
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
627975Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD100544
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Pulverenti, Zaaya, Grabowski, Grabowski, Islam, Li, Murray and Knikou.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1726-1733
pubmed: 26679418
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Oct;26(8):939-48
pubmed: 22460611
J Neurosci. 2007 May 9;27(19):5200-6
pubmed: 17494706
Physiol Rep. 2015 Feb 25;3(2):
pubmed: 25825912
Spinal Cord. 2010 May;48(5):400-6
pubmed: 19935755
Physiol Rev. 2006 Jan;86(1):89-154
pubmed: 16371596
Bioelectromagnetics. 2013 Dec;34(8):630-40
pubmed: 24115026
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Mar;16(3):376-85
pubmed: 15930370
J Neurosci. 1986 May;6(5):1308-13
pubmed: 3711981
Brain. 2020 May 1;143(5):1368-1382
pubmed: 32355959
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;122(11):2254-9
pubmed: 21524606
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Feb;154(3):308-26
pubmed: 14586532
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;186(1):93-105
pubmed: 18046545
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):1-7
pubmed: 17257686
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul;122(7):1387-95
pubmed: 21295518
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jul 8;39:81-101
pubmed: 27023730
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;193(3):397-407
pubmed: 19011843
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Oct;237(10):2461-2479
pubmed: 31309252
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Mar 1;119(3):894-903
pubmed: 29093168
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug;104(2):755-64
pubmed: 20538768
J Physiol. 1999 Oct 15;520 Pt 2:605-19
pubmed: 10523426
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jul;78(1):429-38
pubmed: 9242291
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Dec;43:174-183
pubmed: 30352388
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Oct;121(10):1655-68
pubmed: 20427232
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Aug 1;116(2):904-16
pubmed: 27281748
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 Dec;19(4):313-24
pubmed: 16263963
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jan;233(1):89-103
pubmed: 25205562
J Neurosci. 2014 Jul 2;34(27):8976-87
pubmed: 24990918
J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Jun 15;171(1):1-12
pubmed: 18394711
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;508:369-75
pubmed: 12171132
J Physiol. 2021 May;599(9):2453-2469
pubmed: 31215646
J Physiol. 1999 Mar 15;515 ( Pt 3):929-39
pubmed: 10066917
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jun 15;36(12):2036-2044
pubmed: 30362878
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:516427
pubmed: 23484130
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107
pubmed: 25797650
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 16;29(37):11708-16
pubmed: 19759317
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 09;9(7):e102313
pubmed: 25007330
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Aug;94(2):934-42
pubmed: 15800077
Acta Physiol Scand. 2000 Sep;170(1):65-76
pubmed: 10971225
Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep - Oct;11(5):1083-1092
pubmed: 29848448
Front Physiol. 2018 Jun 25;9:784
pubmed: 29988534
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;114(3):1486-99
pubmed: 26108955
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Oct 1;118(4):2171-2180
pubmed: 28468994
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jul;237(7):1841-1852
pubmed: 31079235
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):555-562
pubmed: 29107040
J Neural Eng. 2021 Feb 04;:
pubmed: 33540399
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jul;228(3):279-96
pubmed: 23708757
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(1):133-6
pubmed: 12898091
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):3131-5
pubmed: 17251364
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul;122(7):1396-404
pubmed: 21237704
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213696
pubmed: 30845251
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Jan 1;119(1):369-376
pubmed: 29046429
Brain. 2001 Jun;124(Pt 6):1171-81
pubmed: 11353733
J Physiol. 2008 Dec 15;586(24):5931-46
pubmed: 18936080
J Physiol. 2011 Dec 1;589(Pt 23):5819-31
pubmed: 21986208
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Jun;109(3):441-9
pubmed: 8817274
Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11(11):1441-50
pubmed: 15853674
Neural Plast. 2017;2017:6751810
pubmed: 29123926
J Neurosci. 2013 Feb 6;33(6):2365-75
pubmed: 23392666
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Jun 1;111(11):2264-75
pubmed: 24598526
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0223135
pubmed: 31557238
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;94(4):2844-55
pubmed: 16000519
Curr Biol. 2012 Dec 18;22(24):2355-61
pubmed: 23200989