Growth modulation of angular deformities with a novel constant force implant concept-preclinical results.
Temporary hemi-epiphysiodesis
growth inhibition by constant force
growth modulation
varus-valgus deformity correction
Journal
Journal of children's orthopaedics
ISSN: 1863-2521
Titre abrégé: J Child Orthop
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101313582
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Apr 2021
19 Apr 2021
Historique:
entrez:
27
5
2021
pubmed:
28
5
2021
medline:
28
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Varus-valgus deformities in children and adolescents are often corrected by temporary hemi-epiphysiodesis, in which the physis is bridged by an implant to inhibit growth. With standard implant solutions, the acting forces cannot be regulated, rendering the correction difficult to control. Furthermore, the implant load steadily increases with ongoing growth potentially leading to implant-related failures. A novel implant concept was developed applying a controlled constant force to the physis, which carries the potential to avoid these complications. The study aim was to proof the concept The proposed implant is made of a conventional cerclage wire and features a twisted coil that unwinds with growth resulting in an implant-specific constant force level. The proximal medial tibial physes of 18 lambs were treated with the implant and assigned to three groups distinct by the force level of the implant (200 N, 120 N, 60 N). The treatment appeared safe without implant-related failures. Deformity creation was statistically different between the groups and yielded on average 10.6° (200 N), 4.8° (120 N) and 0.4° (60 N) over the treatment period. Modulation rates were 0.51°/mm (200 N), 0.23°/mm (120 N) and 0.05°/mm (60 N) and were constant throughout the treatment. By means of the constant force concept, controlled growth modulation appeared feasible in this preclinical experiment. However, clinical trials are necessary to confirm whether the results are translatable to the human pathological situation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34040660
doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200218
pii: jco-15-137
pmc: PMC8138789
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
137-148Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, The author(s).
Références
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Oct-Nov;29(7):736-40
pubmed: 20104155
J Orthop Res. 2006 Jun;24(6):1327-34
pubmed: 16705695
Acta Orthop Scand. 1983 Oct;54(5):730-3
pubmed: 6670489
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):57-60
pubmed: 19098648
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995 Oct;3(5):275-283
pubmed: 10795033
Acta Orthop. 2013 Apr;84(2):202-6
pubmed: 23485073
J Child Orthop. 2016 Oct;10(5):429-37
pubmed: 27417295
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Sep;15(5):699-704
pubmed: 20953936
J Orthop Res. 2018 May;36(5):1398-1405
pubmed: 28976599
J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 May-Jun;25(3):336-41
pubmed: 15832150
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015 Jul;24(4):308-14
pubmed: 25714937
Int Orthop. 2012 Mar;36(3):599-605
pubmed: 21983939
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Apr-May;27(3):253-9
pubmed: 17414005
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949 Jul;31A(3):464-78
pubmed: 18153890
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Dec;9(4):454-461
pubmed: 27709486
J Pediatr Orthop. 2001 Nov-Dec;21(6):817-23
pubmed: 11675562
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(5):481-5
pubmed: 19568021
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011 Feb;23(1):53-9
pubmed: 21169837
J Child Orthop. 2018 Feb 1;12(1):91-96
pubmed: 29456760
J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Jun;31(4):e25-9
pubmed: 21572268
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):862-8
pubmed: 26033070
J Biomech. 2009 Aug 25;42(12):1793-803
pubmed: 19540500
Bone Joint J. 2016 Sep;98-B(9):1270-5
pubmed: 27587531
Bone. 2007 Aug;41(2):197-205
pubmed: 17532281
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 30;2018:6348171
pubmed: 30687754
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Feb;92(2):273-6
pubmed: 20130322