Same day yttrium-90 radioembolization with single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: An opportunity to improve care during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

COVID-19 Dosimetry Same day Selective internal radiotherapy Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography Transarterial radioembolization Yttrium-90 radioembolization

Journal

World journal of gastrointestinal oncology
ISSN: 1948-5204
Titre abrégé: World J Gastrointest Oncol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101532470

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 May 2021
Historique:
received: 08 12 2020
revised: 21 03 2021
accepted: 23 04 2021
entrez: 27 5 2021
pubmed: 28 5 2021
medline: 28 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has made it more challenging for patients to undergo yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization (RE). Same day Y-90 RE provides an opportunity to minimize logistical challenges and infection risk associated with COVID-19, thus improving patient access. To describe the use of same day Y-90 RE with routine single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in order to optimize therapy. All patients were selected for Y-90 RE through a multidisciplinary tumor board, and were screened and tested for COVID-19 infection per institutional protocol. A same day procedure was developed, consisting of angiography, imaging, and Y-90 resin particle delivery. Routine SPECT/CT after technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (Tc-99m MAA) administration was performed for assessment of arterial supply, personalized dosimetry, and extrahepatic activity. Post-treatment Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT was performed for confirmation of particle delivery, by utilization of energy windowing to limit signal from previously administered Tc-99m MAA particles. A total of 14 patients underwent same day Y-90 RE between March and June 2020. Mean lung shunt fraction was 6.13% (range 3.5%-13.1%). Y-90 RE was performed for a single lesion in 7 patients, while the remaining 7 patients had treatment of multifocal lesions. The largest lesion measured 8.3 cm. All patients tolerated the procedure well and were discharged the same day. Same day Y-90 RE with resin-based microspheres is feasible, and provides an opportunity to mitigate infection risk and logistical challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. We recommend consideration of SPECT/CT, especially among patients with complex malignancies, for the potential to improve outcomes and eligibility of patients to undergo same day Y-90 RE.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has made it more challenging for patients to undergo yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization (RE). Same day Y-90 RE provides an opportunity to minimize logistical challenges and infection risk associated with COVID-19, thus improving patient access.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To describe the use of same day Y-90 RE with routine single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in order to optimize therapy.
METHODS METHODS
All patients were selected for Y-90 RE through a multidisciplinary tumor board, and were screened and tested for COVID-19 infection per institutional protocol. A same day procedure was developed, consisting of angiography, imaging, and Y-90 resin particle delivery. Routine SPECT/CT after technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (Tc-99m MAA) administration was performed for assessment of arterial supply, personalized dosimetry, and extrahepatic activity. Post-treatment Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT was performed for confirmation of particle delivery, by utilization of energy windowing to limit signal from previously administered Tc-99m MAA particles.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 14 patients underwent same day Y-90 RE between March and June 2020. Mean lung shunt fraction was 6.13% (range 3.5%-13.1%). Y-90 RE was performed for a single lesion in 7 patients, while the remaining 7 patients had treatment of multifocal lesions. The largest lesion measured 8.3 cm. All patients tolerated the procedure well and were discharged the same day.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Same day Y-90 RE with resin-based microspheres is feasible, and provides an opportunity to mitigate infection risk and logistical challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. We recommend consideration of SPECT/CT, especially among patients with complex malignancies, for the potential to improve outcomes and eligibility of patients to undergo same day Y-90 RE.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34040704
doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i5.440
pmc: PMC8131908
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

440-452

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: No authors received specific funding for the development of this manuscript. Kokabi N conducts Y-90 radioembolization research partially funded by Sirtex Medical Ltd; Duszak R receives research support from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute.

Références

Int J Mol Imaging. 2011;2011:398051
pubmed: 21822489
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;38(19):2201-2205
pubmed: 32343643
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Jun;22(2):93-99
pubmed: 31079717
Lancet. 2020 Jun 20;395(10241):1907-1918
pubmed: 32473681
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1662-1670.e4
pubmed: 30217745
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Mar;30(3):314-319
pubmed: 30819470
J Nucl Med. 2012 Feb;53(2):255-63
pubmed: 22302962
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):602-12
pubmed: 24533871
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):277-87
pubmed: 24461133
Ann Nucl Med. 2011 Aug;25(7):455-61
pubmed: 21643807
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013 Mar;30(1):12-20
pubmed: 24436513
Hepatology. 2014 Jul;60(1):192-201
pubmed: 24691943
J Hepatol. 2020 Jun;72(6):1046-1048
pubmed: 32276729
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2465-2473
pubmed: 28653161
J Nucl Med. 2015 Mar;56(3):339-46
pubmed: 25678490
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Jun;101(6):347-353
pubmed: 32360351
Science. 2020 Jun 19;368(6497):1290
pubmed: 32554570
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Nov;32(6):1179-86
pubmed: 19680720
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Oct;30(10):1648-1649
pubmed: 31514998
Cancer Discov. 2020 Jul;10(7):935-941
pubmed: 32357994
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Dec;43(13):2353-2359
pubmed: 27315059
Semin Nucl Med. 2019 May;49(3):218-226
pubmed: 30954188
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Mar;10(1):12-29
pubmed: 17980315
Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1734-9
pubmed: 12049862
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 May;39(5):872-80
pubmed: 22237844
Radiographics. 2015 Oct;35(6):1627-9
pubmed: 26466175
J Hepatol. 2020 Jun;72(6):1151-1158
pubmed: 32145255
Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1088-1089
pubmed: 32330541
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Jun;18(2):58-65
pubmed: 26070616
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Mar;45(1):59-67
pubmed: 24899979
Gastroenterology. 2010 Jan;138(1):52-64
pubmed: 19766639

Auteurs

Mohammad Elsayed (M)

Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Mohammad Loya (M)

Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

James Galt (J)

Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

David M Schuster (DM)

Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Zachary L Bercu (ZL)

Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Janice Newsome (J)

Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

David Brandon (D)

Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Sonia Benenati (S)

Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Keywan Behbahani (K)

Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States. kbehbah@emory.edu.

Richard Duszak (R)

Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Ila Sethi (I)

Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Nima Kokabi (N)

Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Classifications MeSH