Applying critical discursive psychology to health psychology research: a practical guide.

Critical discursive psychology baby led weaning critical health psychology health communication qualitative

Journal

Health psychology and behavioral medicine
ISSN: 2164-2850
Titre abrégé: Health Psychol Behav Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101624393

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez: 27 5 2021
pubmed: 28 5 2021
medline: 28 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This paper outlines a qualitative methodological approach called Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP), considering its applicability to health psychology research. As applied to health psychology, the growth of discursive methodologies within the discipline tends to be located within a critical health psychology approach where CDP and others enable a consideration of how wider societal discourses shape understandings and experiences of health and illness. Despite the increasing usage of CDP as a methodology, little has been written on the practical application of the method to date, with papers instead focusing on the theoretical underpinnings of a CDP approach. This paper seeks to address that gap and offers a step by step guide to the key principles and analytic stages of CDP before giving a worked example of CDP applied to a health topic, in this case 'baby-led weaning' (BLW). As we discuss, a key strength of CDP, particularly in relation to health psychology, is in its attempts to understand both macro and micro levels of data analysis. By doing so it offers a nuanced and richer understanding of how particular health topics are working within context. Therefore, CDP is a readily applicable analytic approach to contested and complicated topic areas within health research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34040870
doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1792307
pii: 1792307
pmc: PMC8114399
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

234-247

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Références

J Health Psychol. 2009 Apr;14(3):435-46
pubmed: 19293305
J Health Psychol. 2002 May;7(3):253-67
pubmed: 22114249
Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Sep;51(3):436-55
pubmed: 22168901
BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 06;2(1):e000298
pubmed: 22315302

Auteurs

Abigail Locke (A)

Division of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Management, Law & Social Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

Kirsty Budds (K)

Division of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

Classifications MeSH