Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study and Cost Analysis.

axillary lymph node dissection breast cancer breast cancer management iodine seed neoadjuvant chemotherapy nodal metastases radioactive seed targeted axillary node dissection

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Apr 2021
Historique:
entrez: 27 5 2021
pubmed: 28 5 2021
medline: 28 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Introduction Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is a novel technique in the field of surgical oncology. During TAD, patients with node-positive breast cancer who clinically responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy undergo resection of a previously proven metastatic node together with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND). We aimed to assess the success rates of seed insertion and seed retrieval in the Canadian setting, as well as hospital costs of the procedure. Methods Patients converted to clinically node-negative status post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy underwent TAD. Before surgery, an iodine-125 radioactive seed was inserted in the previously proven metastatic node. The seed node was resected together with an SLND. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in all patients with residual metastases. Results Radioactive seeds were successfully inserted in 34/35 patients. In 34 patients, the targeted node was successfully resected with the radioactive probe during TAD. In one patient, the seed was retrieved inferiorly in the axilla during surgery. There was no adverse event. In total, 50% (17/34) of patients had no residual metastases and were able to avoid ALND. Eight out of 17 patients who underwent ALND did not have any residual disease in their specimen. The mean cost of TAD was 25% superior to the mean cost of ALND (p = 0.02). However, the mean total cost of the hospital stay for TAD was 20% superior to the mean cost of ALND (p = 0.11). The mean cost of TAD was 4,322 Can$ (Canadian dollars), similar to the mean cost of both ALND and SLND performed during the same procedure (4,479 Can$). Conclusions TAD was successful in 97% of patients. Despite increased procedural costs, with a lesser impact on total hospital stay costs, TAD was beneficial in 50% of patients. These patients avoided the unnecessary morbidity associated with ALND.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34040910
doi: 10.7759/cureus.14610
pmc: PMC8139537
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e14610

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021, Beniey et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):258-64
pubmed: 25452445
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1072-8
pubmed: 26811528
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Dec;207(6):1372-1379
pubmed: 27726422
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 May 3;98(9):599-609
pubmed: 16670385
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):609-18
pubmed: 23683750
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 7;349(6):546-53
pubmed: 12904519
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):802-7
pubmed: 26649589
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3657-63
pubmed: 17485711
JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1455-61
pubmed: 24101169
Cancer. 2010 Jun 15;116(12):2884-9
pubmed: 20564395
Br J Surg. 2019 Nov;106(12):1632-1639
pubmed: 31593294
JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926
pubmed: 28898379
JAMA Surg. 2015 Feb;150(2):137-43
pubmed: 25517573
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1385-1393
pubmed: 30196031
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):W163-94
pubmed: 17938389
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2468-73
pubmed: 24841348
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1549-53
pubmed: 26727919
Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):547-52
pubmed: 25664534

Auteurs

Michèle Beniey (M)

Department of General Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, CAN.

Kerianne Boulva (K)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, CAN.

Samuel Rodriguez-Qizilbash (S)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, CAN.

Ahmad Kaviani (A)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, CAN.

Rami Younan (R)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, CAN.

Erica Patocskai (E)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, CAN.

Classifications MeSH