Predictive performance of newer Asian hepatocellular carcinoma risk scores in treated Caucasians with chronic hepatitis B.
ALT, alanine aminotransferase
AUROC, area under receiver operating characteristic
CHB, chronic hepatitis B
Cirrhosis
ETV, entecavir
Entecavir
HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
HR, hazard ratio
NA, nucleos(t)ide analogue
NPV, negative predictive value
PPV, positive predictive value
Prediction
TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
Tenofovir
ULN, upper limit of normal
Journal
JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology
ISSN: 2589-5559
Titre abrégé: JHEP Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101761237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
05
02
2021
revised:
23
03
2021
accepted:
25
03
2021
entrez:
27
5
2021
pubmed:
28
5
2021
medline:
28
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recently, several risk scores for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were developed in cohorts of treated Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but they have not been assessed in non-Asian patients. We evaluated the predictability and comparative utility of our PAGE-B and recent Asian HCC risk scores in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-treated adult Caucasian patients with CHB, with or without well-documented compensated cirrhosis but not previous diagnosis of HCC. We included 1,951 patients treated with entecavir/tenofovir and followed up for a median of 7.6 years. The c-statistic was used to estimate the predictability of PAGE-B, HCC-Rescue, CAMD, mPAGE-B, and AASL score for HCC development within 5 or 10 years. The low- and high-risk group cut-offs were used for estimation of negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV), respectively. HCC developed in 103/1,951 (5.3%) patients during the first 5 years and in another 39/1,428 (2.7%) patients between years 5 and 10. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative HCC rates were 3.3%, 5.9%, and 9.6%, respectively. All scores offered good 5- and 10-year HCC prediction (c-statistic: 0.78-0.82). NPVs were always >99% (99.3-100%), whereas PPV ranged between 13% and 24%. In NA-treated Caucasian patients with CHB including compensated cirrhosis, HCC risk scores developed in NA-treated Asian patients offer good 5- and 10-year HCC predictability, similar to that of PAGE-B. PAGE-B and mPAGE-B scores are simpler in clinical practice, as they do not require an accurate diagnosis of cirrhosis, but the addition of albumin in mPAGE-B score does not seem to offer an advantage in patients with well compensated liver disease. Several risk scores for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were recently developed in cohorts of treated Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In Caucasian patients with CHB treated with oral antivirals, newer Asian HCC risk scores offer good 5- and 10-year HCC predictability, similar to that of PAGE-B. For clinical practice, PAGE-B and mPAGE-B scores are simpler, as they do not require an accurate diagnosis of cirrhosis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND & AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Recently, several risk scores for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were developed in cohorts of treated Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but they have not been assessed in non-Asian patients. We evaluated the predictability and comparative utility of our PAGE-B and recent Asian HCC risk scores in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-treated adult Caucasian patients with CHB, with or without well-documented compensated cirrhosis but not previous diagnosis of HCC.
METHODS
METHODS
We included 1,951 patients treated with entecavir/tenofovir and followed up for a median of 7.6 years. The c-statistic was used to estimate the predictability of PAGE-B, HCC-Rescue, CAMD, mPAGE-B, and AASL score for HCC development within 5 or 10 years. The low- and high-risk group cut-offs were used for estimation of negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV), respectively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
HCC developed in 103/1,951 (5.3%) patients during the first 5 years and in another 39/1,428 (2.7%) patients between years 5 and 10. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative HCC rates were 3.3%, 5.9%, and 9.6%, respectively. All scores offered good 5- and 10-year HCC prediction (c-statistic: 0.78-0.82). NPVs were always >99% (99.3-100%), whereas PPV ranged between 13% and 24%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In NA-treated Caucasian patients with CHB including compensated cirrhosis, HCC risk scores developed in NA-treated Asian patients offer good 5- and 10-year HCC predictability, similar to that of PAGE-B. PAGE-B and mPAGE-B scores are simpler in clinical practice, as they do not require an accurate diagnosis of cirrhosis, but the addition of albumin in mPAGE-B score does not seem to offer an advantage in patients with well compensated liver disease.
LAY SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
Several risk scores for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were recently developed in cohorts of treated Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In Caucasian patients with CHB treated with oral antivirals, newer Asian HCC risk scores offer good 5- and 10-year HCC predictability, similar to that of PAGE-B. For clinical practice, PAGE-B and mPAGE-B scores are simpler, as they do not require an accurate diagnosis of cirrhosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34041470
doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100290
pii: S2589-5559(21)00066-5
pmc: PMC8144729
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100290Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
GVP has served as advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Dicerna, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, and Spring Bank and has received research grants from Abbvie and Gilead. GND has served as advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, and Roche and has received grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, and Roche. VS has served as advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Gilead, and Janssen and has received research grants from Abbvie and Gilead. FVB has served as advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche; has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Roche, and Siemens; and has served as consultant for Abbvie, Gilead, and Roche. MB has served as advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Arbutus, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Glaxo Smith-Kleine, Merck, Roche, and Spring Bank. JLC has served as advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, and Merck. JG has served as advisor/lecturer for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche and has received a research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. SM has served as advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche and has received grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead. AL has served as lecturer for Gilead and MYR Pharmaceuticals. JV has served as advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche. CY has served as speaker's bureau and/or advisor for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Merck, and Roche and has received a research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. RE has served as advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, and Novartis. HLAJ has served as consultant for and has received grants from AbbVie, Arbutus, Bristol Myers Squibb, Enyo, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Medimmune, Merck, Roche, Vir Biotechnology Inc., and Viroclinics. TB has served as advisor/consultant/lecturer for Abbvie, Alexion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme/Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Vertex and has received research support from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme/Merck, Novartis, and Roche. PL has served as speaker’s bureau/advisor for Abbvie, Eiger, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck/ Merck Sharp & Dohme, MYR Pharma, and Roche. RI, MP, NG, RV, ML-G, BEH, SS, AK, and KG have nothing to declare. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.
Références
Hepatol Int. 2016 Jan;10(1):1-98
pubmed: 26563120
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jul;31(7):865-872
pubmed: 30694912
Oncology. 2016;90(4):199-208
pubmed: 26934505
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;23(2):170-178
pubmed: 28506056
J Hepatol. 2018 Jun;68(6):1129-1136
pubmed: 29427727
Hepatology. 2017 Nov;66(5):1444-1453
pubmed: 28622419
Hepatology. 2020 Dec;72(6):2197-2205
pubmed: 32602980
Gastroenterology. 2013 May;144(5):933-44
pubmed: 23415803
J Hepatol. 2018 Nov;69(5):1066-1073
pubmed: 30075230
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1660-5
pubmed: 20194845
Hepatology. 2018 Apr;67(4):1560-1599
pubmed: 29405329
J Hepatol. 2017 Aug;67(2):370-398
pubmed: 28427875
J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):722-32
pubmed: 26026875
J Hepatol. 2015 Feb;62(2):363-70
pubmed: 25195548
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):8822-30
pubmed: 24379605
J Hepatol. 2018 Aug;69(2):278-285
pubmed: 29551708
J Hepatol. 2020 Jun;72(6):1088-1096
pubmed: 31981727
J Hepatol. 2012 Apr;56(4):908-43
pubmed: 22424438
J Hepatol. 2015 Apr;62(4):956-67
pubmed: 25595883
Liver Int. 2020 Mar;40(3):484-495
pubmed: 31884726
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236
pubmed: 29628281
Gut. 2015 Aug;64(8):1289-95
pubmed: 25011935
J Hepatol. 2009 Jan;50(1):80-8
pubmed: 18977053
J Hepatol. 2016 Apr;64(4):800-6
pubmed: 26678008
J Hepatol. 2010 Aug;53(2):348-56
pubmed: 20483498
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jun;12(6):568-74
pubmed: 21497551