Perspectives of nurses' role in interprofessional pharmaceutical care across 14 European countries: A qualitative study in pharmacists, physicians and nurses.
Adult
Aged
Europe
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nurse's Role
/ psychology
Nurses
/ psychology
Patient Compliance
Pharmaceutical Services
/ organization & administration
Pharmacists
/ psychology
Physicians
/ psychology
Qualitative Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
20
11
2020
accepted:
07
05
2021
entrez:
27
5
2021
pubmed:
28
5
2021
medline:
25
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To understand healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of nurses' potential or ideal roles in pharmaceutical care (PC). Qualitative study conducted through semi-structured in-depth interviews. Between December 2018 and October 2019, interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals of 14 European countries in four healthcare settings: hospitals, community care, mental health and long-term residential care. In each country, pharmacists, physicians and nurses in each of the four settings were interviewed. Participants were selected on the basis that they were key informants with broad knowledge and experience of PC. All interviews were conducted face to face. Each country conducted an initial thematic analysis. Consensus was reached through a face-to-face discussion of all 14 national leads. 340 interviews were completed. Several tasks were described within four potential nursing responsibilities, that came up as the analysis themes, being: 1) monitoring therapeutic/adverse effects of medicines, 2) monitoring medicines adherence, 3) decision making on medicines, including prescribing 4) providing patient education/information. Nurses' autonomy varied across Europe, from none to limited to a few tasks and emergencies to a broad range of tasks and responsibilities. Intended level of autonomy depended on medicine types and level of education. Some changes are needed before nursing roles can be optimised and implemented in practice. Lack of time, shortage of nurses, absence of legal frameworks and limited education and knowledge are main threats to European nurses actualising their ideal role in PC. European nurses have an active role in PC. Respondents reported positive impacts on care quality and patient outcomes when nurses assumed PC responsibilities. Healthcare professionals expect nurses to report observations and assessments. This key patient information should be shared and addressed by the interprofessional team. The study evidences the need of a unique and consensus-based PC framework across Europe.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34043650
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251982
pii: PONE-D-20-36633
pmc: PMC8158867
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0251982Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The study “Perspectives of nurses’ roles in interprofessional pharmaceutical care across 14 European countries: a qualitative study in pharmacists, physicians and nurses” was supported by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union [grant number 2018-1-BE02-KA203-046861] and MDMJ accountants, Belgium (https://www.mdmj.be). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Within this Competing Interests Statement, we explicitly elaborate on MDMJ accountants as a commercial co-funder of this study. This organisation is an accountancy service in Belgium that financially supported the Belgian authors. No competing interests interfered with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation of this research. Next to the financial support, no professional or personal competing interests can be declared about this commercial funder. The financial support consisted of a gift of 27000€, to be used as co-funding of the Belgian research team, next to the funding of the Erasmus+ programme of the European Union. No other statements relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development or marketed products can be declared. The Belgian authors confirm that the financial support of MDMJ accountants does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Drugs Aging. 2021 Feb;38(2):169-179
pubmed: 33314009
Health Policy. 2007 Apr;81(1):56-67
pubmed: 16777257
Lancet. 2014 May 24;383(9931):1824-30
pubmed: 24581683
J Nurs Manag. 2010 Oct;18(7):853-61
pubmed: 20946221
J Interprof Care. 2015 May;29(3):209-15
pubmed: 25051089
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):90-97
pubmed: 30953335
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul 26;11:175
pubmed: 21791106
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Sep;71(9):1973-85
pubmed: 25731727
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Mar;47(3):533-43
pubmed: 2316538
Nurs Stand. 2019 Feb 22;34(3):44-50
pubmed: 31468926
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jul;26(13-14):1978-1992
pubmed: 27706878
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Jul;19:36-40
pubmed: 27428690
COPD. 2015 Aug;12(4):395-403
pubmed: 25474080
Br J Nurs. 2009 Jan 8-21;18(1):38-9
pubmed: 19127230
J Nurs Manag. 2020 May;28(4):912-918
pubmed: 32255223
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Dec 9;17(1):95
pubmed: 31815622
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jun;34(6):1040-7
pubmed: 24090615
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Sep;34(3):282-5
pubmed: 27406215
Axone. 2007 Spring;28(3):14-9
pubmed: 17682687
J Interprof Care. 2016 Sep;30(5):661-7
pubmed: 27436781
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2017;51:e03255
pubmed: 29211232
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Jun;41(3):728-733
pubmed: 30937695
Qual Health Res. 2018 Mar;28(4):673-680
pubmed: 29290148
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):99-104
pubmed: 25709698
BMC Pulm Med. 2015 Feb 22;15:16
pubmed: 25880414
Med Educ. 2015 Apr;49(4):399-407
pubmed: 25800300
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018 Mar;17(3):259-275
pubmed: 29303376
J Interprof Care. 2016 Sep;30(5):649-54
pubmed: 27351385
J Interprof Care. 2009 Mar;23(2):169-84
pubmed: 19234987
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4456-4466
pubmed: 28233457
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jan;107(1):1-5
pubmed: 30598643
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):980-990
pubmed: 29521716
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6:CD000072
pubmed: 28639262
Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405
pubmed: 23480423
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jan;37(2):155-65
pubmed: 11851783
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Oct;28(7):1644-1652
pubmed: 32757476
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):640
pubmed: 31492188
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 13;10(10):e0140203
pubmed: 26461064
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Feb;70(2):295-309
pubmed: 23711235
Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Apr;24(2):e12625
pubmed: 29457315
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 3;10(6):e036269
pubmed: 32499269
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):1198-1208
pubmed: 29148105
Home Healthc Now. 2019 Jul/Aug;37(4):198-207
pubmed: 31274582
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Jun;36(3):544-55
pubmed: 24748506
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Feb;25(3-4):454-62
pubmed: 26818370
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;26(6):927-934
pubmed: 27485719
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Nov;15(11):2723-2788
pubmed: 29135752
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Sep;29(3):521-7
pubmed: 25376737
J Prof Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;30(1):43-7
pubmed: 24503314
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2015 Jul;51(3):180-9
pubmed: 25088207
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb 29;12:50
pubmed: 22375908
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jan;68(1):199-205
pubmed: 21658097
J Nurs Res. 2014 Dec;22(4):283-91
pubmed: 25265368
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 13;6(6):e011394
pubmed: 27297014
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0220885
pubmed: 31509537
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124
pubmed: 29202616
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Aug;21(8):614-36
pubmed: 26233535