Development and validation of a risk prediction model for in-hospital major cardiovascular events in patients hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction.
myocardial infarction
risk management
stroke
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2021
27 05 2021
Historique:
entrez:
28
5
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
4
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have considerable variability in in-hospital risks, resulting in higher demands on healthcare resources. Simple risk-assessment tools are important for the identification of patients with higher risk to inform clinical decisions. However, few risk assessment tools have been built that are suitable for populations with AMI in China. We aim to develop and validate a risk prediction model, and further build a risk scoring system. Data from a nationally representative retrospective study was used to develop the model. Patients from a prospective study and another nationally representative retrospective study were both used for external validation. 161 nationally representative hospitals, and 53 and 157 other hospitals were involved in the above three studies, respectively. 8010 patients hospitalised for AMI were included as development sample, and 4485 and 11 223 other patients were included as validation samples in their corresponding studies. The in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as death from any cause, recurrent AMI, or ischaemic stroke. The proportion of in-hospital MACE was 11.7%, 8.8% and 11.4% among the development sample and two external-validation samples, respectively. Nine predictors (ie, age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, Killip class, systolic blood pressure, creatinine, white blood cell count, heart rate and blood glucose) were independently associated with in-hospital MACE. The model performed well on both discrimination and calibration capability, with areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) curve of 0.85, 0.74 and 0.80, and calibration slopes of 0.98, 0.84 and 0.97 in the development sample and two external validation samples, respectively. A point-based risk scoring system was built with good discrimination and reclassification ability. A prediction model using readily available clinical parameters was developed and externally validated to estimate risks of in-hospital MACE among patients with AMI, thereby better informing decision-making in improving clinical care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34045213
pii: bmjopen-2020-042506
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042506
pmc: PMC8162080
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e042506Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JLi reported receiving research grants, through Fuwai Hospital, from the People’s Republic of China for work to improve the management of hypertension and blood lipids and to improve care quality and patient outcomes of cardiovascular disease; receiving research agreements, through the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases and Fuwai Hospital, from Amgen for a multicentre clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil and for patient with dyslipidaemia registration; receiving a research agreement, through Fuwai Hospital, from Sanofi for a multicentre clinical trial on the effects of sotagliflozin; receiving a research agreement, through Fuwai Hospital, with the University of Oxford for a multicentre clinical trial of empagliflozin; receiving a research agreement, through the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, from AstraZeneca for clinical research methods training outside the submitted work; and receiving a research agreement, through the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, from Lilly for physician training outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Références
Circulation. 2014 Apr 8;129(14):1493-501
pubmed: 24573351
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 4;70(1):1-25
pubmed: 28527533
Circulation. 2000 Oct 24;102(17):2031-7
pubmed: 11044416
Heart. 2009 Jun;95(11):888-94
pubmed: 19246481
JAMA. 2000 Aug 16;284(7):835-42
pubmed: 10938172
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 27;163(19):2345-53
pubmed: 14581255
Am Heart J. 2011 Jan;161(1):113-122.e2
pubmed: 21167342
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 25;2(5):
pubmed: 23015602
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 13;8(1):9082
pubmed: 29899463
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 21;4(2):e004425
pubmed: 24561498
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):2354-94
pubmed: 25249586
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 12;9(9):e030772
pubmed: 31515430
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;118(8):1105-1110
pubmed: 27561191
JAMA. 1998 Aug 19;280(7):623-9
pubmed: 9718054
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Mar;3(1):67-77
pubmed: 24562805
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jan 5;129(1):72-80
pubmed: 26712436
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 1;110(5):628-35
pubmed: 22608950
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177
pubmed: 28886621
Circulation. 2015 Oct 27;132(17):1667-78
pubmed: 26503749
Circ Res. 2017 Sep 1;121(6):677-694
pubmed: 28860318
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181079
pubmed: 30646102
Circulation. 2000 Jun 6;101(22):2557-67
pubmed: 10840005
Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(17):1279-91
pubmed: 23444397
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 9;68(6):626-635
pubmed: 27491907
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):55-63
pubmed: 25560714
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Nov;6(6):732-40
pubmed: 24221838
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 15;259:31-39
pubmed: 29579607
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Nov;10(11):
pubmed: 29158421