Predictive modeling for peri-implantitis by using machine learning techniques.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2021
27 05 2021
Historique:
received:
16
02
2021
accepted:
11
05
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to create a model for predicting the onset of peri-implantitis by using machine learning methods and to clarify interactions between risk indicators. This study evaluated 254 implants, 127 with and 127 without peri-implantitis, from among 1408 implants with at least 4 years in function. Demographic data and parameters known to be risk factors for the development of peri-implantitis were analyzed with three models: logistic regression, support vector machines, and random forests (RF). As the results, RF had the highest performance in predicting the onset of peri-implantitis (AUC: 0.71, accuracy: 0.70, precision: 0.72, recall: 0.66, and f1-score: 0.69). The factor that had the most influence on prediction was implant functional time, followed by oral hygiene. In addition, PCR of more than 50% to 60%, smoking more than 3 cigarettes/day, KMW less than 2 mm, and the presence of less than two occlusal supports tended to be associated with an increased risk of peri-implantitis. Moreover, these risk indicators were not independent and had complex effects on each other. The results of this study suggest that peri-implantitis onset was predicted in 70% of cases, by RF which allows consideration of nonlinear relational data with complex interactions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34045590
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90642-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-90642-4
pmc: PMC8160334
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11090Références
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009 Feb;5(2):149-69
pubmed: 19239395
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):286-91
pubmed: 18724856
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jun;27(6):650-5
pubmed: 26474541
J Dent. 2018 Dec;79:1-10
pubmed: 30391683
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Feb;30(2):111-120
pubmed: 30580459
J Dent Res. 2016 Jan;95(1):43-9
pubmed: 26701919
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):292-304
pubmed: 18724857
F1000Res. 2019 Oct 8;8:1728
pubmed: 31824670
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul;25(7):791-6
pubmed: 23763507
Neurosurgery. 2018 Aug 1;83(2):181-192
pubmed: 28945910
J Clin Periodontol. 2012 May;39(5):490-4
pubmed: 22486273
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S158-71
pubmed: 25495683
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S267-S290
pubmed: 29926957
BMJ. 2020 Mar 20;368:l6927
pubmed: 32198138
J Prosthodont Res. 2019 Apr;63(2):216-220
pubmed: 30600176
J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Apr;43(4):383-8
pubmed: 26900869
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Mar;28(3):314-319
pubmed: 26919480
J Dent Res. 2020 Jul;99(7):769-774
pubmed: 32315260
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):1278-1290
pubmed: 27647536
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 31;188(12):2222-2239
pubmed: 31509183
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Dec;24(12):1565-7
pubmed: 17160063
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Feb;13(1):1-19
pubmed: 12005139