Subclinical gait disturbance and postoperative gait improvement in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2021
27 05 2021
Historique:
received:
25
02
2021
accepted:
18
05
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
24
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the subclinical gait abnormalities and the postoperative gait improvements in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy using three-dimensional gait analysis. We reviewed the gait analysis of 62 patients who underwent surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy. The asymptomatic gait group included 30 patients and the gait disturbance group included 32 patients who can walk on their own slowly or need assistive device on stairs. The step width (17.2 cm vs. 15.9 cm, P = 0.003), stride length (105.2 cm vs. 109.1 cm, P = 0.015), and double-limb support duration (13.4% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.027) improved only in the asymptomatic gait group. Preoperatively, the asymptomatic gait group exhibited better maximum knee flexion angle (60.5° vs. 54.8°, P = 0.001) and ankle plantarflexion angle at push-off (- 12.2° vs. - 6.5°, P = 0.001) compared to the gait disturbance group. Postoperatively, maximum knee flexion angle (62.3° vs. 58.2°, P = 0.004) and ankle plantarflexion angle at push-off (- 12.8° vs. - 8.3°, P = 0.002) were still better in the asymptomatic gait group, although both parameters improved in the gait disturbance group (P = 0.005, 0.039, respectively). Kinematic parameters could improve in patients with gait disturbance. However, temporospatial parameters improvement may be expected when the operative treatment is performed before apparent gait disturbance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34045643
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90884-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-90884-2
pmc: PMC8160212
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11179Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Apr 1;42(7):E398-E403
pubmed: 27438386
Asian Spine J. 2012 Dec;6(4):233-40
pubmed: 23275806
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Aug;43(16):E927-E934
pubmed: 29462067
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jun 15;40(12):E675-93
pubmed: 25839387
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Dec;31(10):435-440
pubmed: 30222623
J Orthop Sci. 2001;6(5):378-84
pubmed: 11845345
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Oct;91(10):1587-92
pubmed: 20875519
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jan;24(1):48-56
pubmed: 24622959
Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2456-66
pubmed: 22825630
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:275-282
pubmed: 28192261
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2538-44
pubmed: 23907308
Lancet. 1999 Jul 31;354(9176):370-3
pubmed: 10437865
Gait Posture. 2018 Jan;59:152-156
pubmed: 29031141
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 1;30(1):83-6
pubmed: 15626986
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:314-320
pubmed: 28602883
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 15;36(8):E524-30
pubmed: 21224774
Am J Med. 2018 Jun;131(6):602-607
pubmed: 29288631
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jan 15;44(2):96-102
pubmed: 29939973
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 20;13(1):60
pubmed: 29558952
Spine J. 2018 Sep;18(9):1645-1652
pubmed: 29746965
Neurosurgery. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):E292-E299
pubmed: 31792501
J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Apr;2(4):418-24
pubmed: 15871480
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Aug;11(2):104-11
pubmed: 19769489
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Apr;30(4):189-93
pubmed: 26562581
Asian Spine J. 2019 Jun;13(3):423-431
pubmed: 30685954
Asian Spine J. 2019 Feb;13(1):45-55
pubmed: 30326696
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 May;84(4):614-8
pubmed: 12043789