YouTube as a Source of Information on Epidural Steroid Injection.
back pain
epidural steroid injection
online media
quality
sciatica
social media
Journal
Journal of pain research
ISSN: 1178-7090
Titre abrégé: J Pain Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101540514
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
19
02
2021
accepted:
04
05
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
29
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the advance of the internet, social media platforms have become a major source of medical information. We assessed the reliability, quality, and usefulness of the most-viewed YouTube videos of epidural steroid injection (ESI). A search was conducted on YouTube on February 13, 2020, using the keywords "epidural injection," "epidural steroid injection," "epidural transforaminal injection," and "epidural transforaminal steroid injection." The top 50 most-viewed videos were assessed with a modified DISCERN scale (mDISCERN) and a Global Quality Scale (GQS). Further, the usefulness of information in each video was evaluated. Only 22% of videos contained information with high reliability, and these were produced by hospitals or physicians. None of the videos provided by media organizations and patients were reliable. As for information quality, only 34% were moderate to excellent quality. Even of the videos produced by hospitals or physicians, approximately half were of generally poor or poor quality. Regarding the usefulness of information, although 76% were assessed to contain useful information, 8% had misleading information. Particularly, four of these videos contained misleading information, and three were provided by patients who experienced ESI. YouTube is a platform where medical information is actively shared and widespread. Here, we found that the reliability and quality of videos were low even when these were produced by hospitals or physicians. Further, the quality tended to be much lower when it was provided by media organizations or patients. Future efforts by physicians and professional societies to improve the reliability and quality of medical content are necessary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34045894
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S307506
pii: 307506
pmc: PMC8149278
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1353-1357Informations de copyright
© 2021 Chang and Park.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Virtual Mentor. 2005 Feb 01;7(2):
pubmed: 23249461
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;9(2):163-168
pubmed: 32233623
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Jul;16(7):504
pubmed: 24947833
BMJ. 2007 Jun 23;334(7607):1313-7
pubmed: 17585160
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;102(9):2070-7
pubmed: 17511753
Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020 Apr;37(2):84-89
pubmed: 32204582
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Aug;31(8):1324-30
pubmed: 27478346
Pain Pract. 2020 Dec 9;:
pubmed: 33296544
P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):491-520
pubmed: 25083128
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990 Jul;34(5):335-8
pubmed: 2167604
Neuromodulation. 2021 Jan;24(1):156-161
pubmed: 33137842
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11
pubmed: 10396471
Cureus. 2020 Aug 22;12(8):e9934
pubmed: 32968595