Inflammatory indices and clinical factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab: the development of a novel prognostic score (Meet-URO 15 study).
biomarkers
clinical factors
immune checkpoint inhibitor
immunotherapy
prognostic score
renal cell carcinoma
Journal
Therapeutic advances in medical oncology
ISSN: 1758-8340
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Med Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101510808
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
15
01
2021
accepted:
05
05
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
29
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the survival advantage, not all metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients achieve a long-term benefit from immunotherapy. Moreover, the identification of prognostic biomarkers is still an unmet clinical need. This multicenter retrospective study investigated the prognostic role of peripheral-blood inflammatory indices and clinical factors to develop a novel prognostic score in mRCC patients receiving at least second-line nivolumab. The complete blood count before the first cycle of therapy was assessed by calculating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). Clinical factors included pre-treatment International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score, line of therapy, and metastatic sites. From October 2015 to November 2019, 571 mRCC patients received nivolumab as second- and further-line treatment in 69% and 31% of cases. In univariable and multivariable analyses all inflammatory indices, IMDC score, and bone metastases significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). The multivariable model with NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had the highest c-index (0.697) and was chosen for the developing of the score (Schneeweiss scoring system). After internal validation (bootstrap re-sampling), the final index (Meet-URO score) composed by NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had a c-index of 0.691. It identified five categories with distinctive OSs: group 1 (median OS - mOS = not reached), group 2 (mOS = 43.9 months), group 3 (mOS = 22.4 months), group 4 (mOS = 10.3 months), and group 5 (mOS = 3.2 months). Moreover, the Meet-URO score allowed for a fine risk-stratification across all three IMDC groups. The Meet-URO score allowed for the accurate stratification of pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab and is easily applicable for clinical practice at no additional cost. Future steps include its external validation, the assessment of its predictivity, and its application to first-line combinations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite the survival advantage, not all metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients achieve a long-term benefit from immunotherapy. Moreover, the identification of prognostic biomarkers is still an unmet clinical need.
METHODS
METHODS
This multicenter retrospective study investigated the prognostic role of peripheral-blood inflammatory indices and clinical factors to develop a novel prognostic score in mRCC patients receiving at least second-line nivolumab. The complete blood count before the first cycle of therapy was assessed by calculating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). Clinical factors included pre-treatment International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score, line of therapy, and metastatic sites.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From October 2015 to November 2019, 571 mRCC patients received nivolumab as second- and further-line treatment in 69% and 31% of cases. In univariable and multivariable analyses all inflammatory indices, IMDC score, and bone metastases significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). The multivariable model with NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had the highest c-index (0.697) and was chosen for the developing of the score (Schneeweiss scoring system). After internal validation (bootstrap re-sampling), the final index (Meet-URO score) composed by NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had a c-index of 0.691. It identified five categories with distinctive OSs: group 1 (median OS - mOS = not reached), group 2 (mOS = 43.9 months), group 3 (mOS = 22.4 months), group 4 (mOS = 10.3 months), and group 5 (mOS = 3.2 months). Moreover, the Meet-URO score allowed for a fine risk-stratification across all three IMDC groups.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The Meet-URO score allowed for the accurate stratification of pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab and is easily applicable for clinical practice at no additional cost. Future steps include its external validation, the assessment of its predictivity, and its application to first-line combinations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34046089
doi: 10.1177/17588359211019642
pii: 10.1177_17588359211019642
pmc: PMC8135208
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
17588359211019642Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement: Dr Fornarini services advisory boards for Astellas, Janssen, Pfizer, Bayer, MSD, and Merck, and received travel accommodation from Astellas, Janssen, and Bayer. Dr Buti received honoraria as a speaker at scientific events and in an advisory role by BMS, Pfizer; MSD, Ipsen, Roche, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis. Dr Banna reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Janssen-Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Pierre Fabre, IPSEN, outside the submitted work. Dr De Giorgi services as an advisory/board member of Astellas, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, IPSEN, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, and Sanofi, received research grant/funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi, and travel/accommodations/expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb, IPSEN, Janssen, and Pfizer. Dr Zucali services advisory boards/consulting for Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, IPSEN, Novartis, Roche, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, and Astellas. Dr Masini received personal fees as a speaker from Astellas, as a consultant from IPSEN, MSD, and Janssen, and for travel accommodation from BMS, Pfizer, Astellas, Janssen, and IPSEN. Dr Procopio services advisory boards/consulting for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, IPSEN, Merk, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr Cortellini receives speaker fees/grant consultancies from Astrazeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, and Astellas. Dr Morelli received grants from MSD and Pfizer. Dr Bersanelli received research funding to the institution from Roche, Pfizer, Seqirus UK, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Sanofi, and received personal fees for advisory role, copyright transfer, consultancies, and as speaker at scientific events from Sciclone Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis, and Pfizer. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13
pubmed: 26406148
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Jan 10;:1-5
pubmed: 33427023
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Apr;18(2):e83-e90
pubmed: 31753738
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul;23(7):1204-12
pubmed: 24793958
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 8;366(10):883-892
pubmed: 22397650
Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):135-141
pubmed: 28233671
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020 Dec;69(12):2513-2522
pubmed: 32561968
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 04;11(12):
pubmed: 31817109
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1533-1542
pubmed: 32953525
Int Immunopharmacol. 2019 Dec;77:105957
pubmed: 31677498
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Oct 17;5(1):82
pubmed: 29041991
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 29;106(6):dju124
pubmed: 24875653
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 10;34(3):515-24
pubmed: 25382379
Stat Med. 2012 Oct 15;31(23):2676-86
pubmed: 22307964
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Urol Clin North Am. 2020 Aug;47(3):293-303
pubmed: 32600532
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Jun;16(3):e563-e575
pubmed: 29402706
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):577-84
pubmed: 23962746
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5794-9
pubmed: 19826129
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3839-3846
pubmed: 30967420
Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;126(18):4156-4167
pubmed: 32673417
Anticancer Res. 2019 Aug;39(8):4371-4377
pubmed: 31366532
Oncologist. 2020 Mar;25(3):e484-e491
pubmed: 32162798
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020 Feb;20(2):169-185
pubmed: 31608727
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):90
pubmed: 32631294
Target Oncol. 2019 Aug;14(4):453-463
pubmed: 31359231
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(24):e14834
pubmed: 31192906
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:22-28
pubmed: 27181564
BJU Int. 2019 Jan;123(1):98-105
pubmed: 29956884
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Oct;16(5):355-359.e1
pubmed: 29803346
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 05;11(12):
pubmed: 31817541
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jan 07;12(1):
pubmed: 31936065
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Jan 22;6(1):5
pubmed: 29353553
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 08;5(4):e006404
pubmed: 25854964
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):293-300
pubmed: 25681967
Anticancer Res. 2020 Aug;40(8):4395-4400
pubmed: 32727768
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Nov;22(11):2130-2135
pubmed: 32232716
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):141-8
pubmed: 23312463
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 May;24(5):526-532
pubmed: 30604160
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 25;20(1):110
pubmed: 32711491
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Feb 23;11:955-965
pubmed: 29503570
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 17;50(2):214-220
pubmed: 31755525
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):135-144
pubmed: 31512006
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):337-44
pubmed: 10877287
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Oct 17;6(1):107
pubmed: 30333065
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Jul;21(4):365-377.e5
pubmed: 32245624
Cancer Med. 2020 Apr;9(8):2752-2760
pubmed: 32100417
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Sep;2(5):505-514
pubmed: 31377308