Native to designed: microbial -amylases for industrial applications.
-amylase
Directed evolution
Industrial usages
Microbial enzymes
Protein engineering
Rational design
Structural properties
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
17
02
2021
accepted:
30
03
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
29
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
-amylases catalyze the endo-hydrolysis of -1,4-D-glycosidic bonds in starch into smaller moieties. While industrial processes are usually performed at harsh conditions, -amylases from mainly the bacteria, fungi and yeasts are preferred for their stabilities (thermal, pH and oxidative) and specificities (substrate and product). Microbial -amylases can be purified and characterized for industrial applications. While exploring novel enzymes with these properties in the nature is time-costly, the advancements in protein engineering techniques including rational design, directed evolution and others have privileged their modifications to exhibit industrially ideal traits. However, the commentary on the strategies and preferably mutated residues are lacking, hindering the design of new mutants especially for enhanced substrate specificity and oxidative stability. Thus, our review ensures wider accessibility of the previously reported experimental findings to facilitate the future engineering work. A traditional review approach was taken to focus on the engineering of microbial -amylases to enhance industrially favoured characteristics. The action mechanisms of - and -amylases were compared to avoid any bias in the research background. This review aimed to discuss the advances in modifying microbial -amylases via protein engineering to achieve longer half-life in high temperature, improved resistance (acidic, alkaline and oxidative) and enhanced specificities (substrate and product). Captivating results were discussed in depth, including the extended half-life at 100C, pH 3.5 and 10, 1.8 M hydrogen peroxide as well as enhanced substrate (65.3%) and product (42.4%) specificities. These shed light to the future microbial -amylase engineering in achieving paramount biochemical traits ameliorations to apt in the industries. Microbial -amylases can be tailored for specific industrial applications through protein engineering (rational design and directed evolution). While the critical mutation points are dependent on respective enzymes, formation of disulfide bridge between cysteine residues after mutations is crucial for elevated thermostability. Amino acids conversion to basic residues was reported for enhanced acidic resistance while hydrophobic interaction resulted from mutated hydrophobic residues in carbohydrate-binding module or surface-binding sites is pivotal for improved substrate specificity. Substitution of oxidation-prone methionine residues with non-polar residues increases the enzyme oxidative stability. Hence, this review provides conceptual advances for the future microbial -amylases designs to exhibit industrially significant characteristics. However, more attention is needed to enhance substrate specificity and oxidative stability since they are least reported.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
-amylases catalyze the endo-hydrolysis of -1,4-D-glycosidic bonds in starch into smaller moieties. While industrial processes are usually performed at harsh conditions, -amylases from mainly the bacteria, fungi and yeasts are preferred for their stabilities (thermal, pH and oxidative) and specificities (substrate and product). Microbial -amylases can be purified and characterized for industrial applications. While exploring novel enzymes with these properties in the nature is time-costly, the advancements in protein engineering techniques including rational design, directed evolution and others have privileged their modifications to exhibit industrially ideal traits. However, the commentary on the strategies and preferably mutated residues are lacking, hindering the design of new mutants especially for enhanced substrate specificity and oxidative stability. Thus, our review ensures wider accessibility of the previously reported experimental findings to facilitate the future engineering work.
SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND OBJECTIVES
UNASSIGNED
A traditional review approach was taken to focus on the engineering of microbial -amylases to enhance industrially favoured characteristics. The action mechanisms of - and -amylases were compared to avoid any bias in the research background. This review aimed to discuss the advances in modifying microbial -amylases via protein engineering to achieve longer half-life in high temperature, improved resistance (acidic, alkaline and oxidative) and enhanced specificities (substrate and product). Captivating results were discussed in depth, including the extended half-life at 100C, pH 3.5 and 10, 1.8 M hydrogen peroxide as well as enhanced substrate (65.3%) and product (42.4%) specificities. These shed light to the future microbial -amylase engineering in achieving paramount biochemical traits ameliorations to apt in the industries.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Microbial -amylases can be tailored for specific industrial applications through protein engineering (rational design and directed evolution). While the critical mutation points are dependent on respective enzymes, formation of disulfide bridge between cysteine residues after mutations is crucial for elevated thermostability. Amino acids conversion to basic residues was reported for enhanced acidic resistance while hydrophobic interaction resulted from mutated hydrophobic residues in carbohydrate-binding module or surface-binding sites is pivotal for improved substrate specificity. Substitution of oxidation-prone methionine residues with non-polar residues increases the enzyme oxidative stability. Hence, this review provides conceptual advances for the future microbial -amylases designs to exhibit industrially significant characteristics. However, more attention is needed to enhance substrate specificity and oxidative stability since they are least reported.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34046253
doi: 10.7717/peerj.11315
pii: 11315
pmc: PMC8139272
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e11315Informations de copyright
2021 Lim and Oslan.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Références
J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Jan 22;68(3):838-844
pubmed: 31896254
Front Microbiol. 2017 Mar 22;8:493
pubmed: 28382032
Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Oct 1;117:831-839
pubmed: 29864538
Trends Biotechnol. 2020 May;38(5):474-486
pubmed: 31954528
J Biotechnol. 2016 Jan 10;217:53-61
pubmed: 26597712
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jun 16;83(13):
pubmed: 28455329
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Jan 31;7(1):18
pubmed: 24485248
J Agric Food Chem. 2020 May 13;68(19):5391-5401
pubmed: 32338906
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;103(23-24):9433-9442
pubmed: 31676918
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jul 31;8:871
pubmed: 32850729
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 May;98(9):3997-4007
pubmed: 24247992
Curr Microbiol. 2020 Sep;77(9):2192-2206
pubmed: 32451686
J Biosci Bioeng. 2010 Jun;109(6):531-8
pubmed: 20471589
Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Aug;115:1151-1156
pubmed: 29729336
J Biol Chem. 2016 Nov 4;291(45):23734-23743
pubmed: 27621314
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1994 Dec;4(6):885-92
pubmed: 7712292
J Food Biochem. 2019 May;43(5):e12826
pubmed: 31353531
Eur J Biochem. 1992 Jan 15;203(1-2):225-31
pubmed: 1730228
Food Technol Biotechnol. 2018 Mar;56(1):58-64
pubmed: 29795997
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2018 Oct;117:96-102
pubmed: 30037559
Curr Microbiol. 2003 Mar;46(3):211-6
pubmed: 12567245
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Jul 1;132:1274-1281
pubmed: 30953727
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Feb 1;102(2):380-9
pubmed: 18951544
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 22;9(1):2612
pubmed: 30796314
J Mol Biol. 2008 May 9;378(4):852-70
pubmed: 18387632
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Apr;43(4):473-84
pubmed: 26790418
Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2013 Sep 24;73:9.9.1-9.9.23
pubmed: 24510596
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Nov;78(21):7519-26
pubmed: 22865059
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2020 Sep;192(1):57-70
pubmed: 32219624
Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2015 Jan 1;71(Pt 1):66-70
pubmed: 25615972
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Nov 1;140:825-832
pubmed: 31401271
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 26;21(5):
pubmed: 32111065
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Jul 1;132:558-574
pubmed: 30928371
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1992 Feb;56(2):207-10
pubmed: 1377974
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0121531
pubmed: 25811759
Bioinform Biol Insights. 2017 Nov 06;11:1177932217738764
pubmed: 29162975
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57403
pubmed: 23554859
Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Mar;108:56-68
pubmed: 29180048
Front Microbiol. 2016 Jul 28;7:1129
pubmed: 27516755
Essays Biochem. 2015;59:1-41
pubmed: 26504249
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018 Mar;38(2):272-293
pubmed: 28683572
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:529059
pubmed: 26090417
Chemosphere. 2016 Jun;152:166-72
pubmed: 26971168
Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2020 Jul;67(4):677-684
pubmed: 32133700
J Biosci Bioeng. 2013 Nov;116(5):616-9
pubmed: 23731869
Microorganisms. 2018 Apr 29;6(2):
pubmed: 29710826
Biomolecules. 2013 Aug 23;3(3):597-611
pubmed: 24970183
Biotechnol Adv. 2019 Dec;37(8):107451
pubmed: 31536775
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 May;98(10):4503-19
pubmed: 24413972
J Biotechnol. 2016 Mar 20;222:65-72
pubmed: 26869314
Biochemistry. 2000 Aug 8;39(31):9099-107
pubmed: 10924103
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Jun 21;65(24):5041-5048
pubmed: 28573852
Enzyme Res. 2017;2017:4086845
pubmed: 29359041
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jun 27;2018:3258383
pubmed: 30050926
J Biotechnol. 2015 Feb 10;195:8-14
pubmed: 25533400
Adv Appl Bioinform Chem. 2019 Jun 07;12:1-13
pubmed: 31239719
J Biosci Bioeng. 2013 Oct;116(4):449-51
pubmed: 23702189
BMC Genet. 2019 Mar 7;20(1):25
pubmed: 30845909
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2006 Aug 1;62(Pt 8):716-21
pubmed: 16880540
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Feb 15;145:804-812
pubmed: 31758985
J Biotechnol. 2002 Mar 28;94(2):137-55
pubmed: 11796168
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Oct 1;138:394-402
pubmed: 31325505
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Apr 15;127:683-692
pubmed: 30703426
Biotechnol Adv. 2017 Sep;35(5):619-632
pubmed: 28457999
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 20;7(1):17933
pubmed: 29263337
Plant Mol Biol. 1994 May;25(2):141-57
pubmed: 8018865
Mol Biol Rep. 2019 Feb;46(1):921-932
pubmed: 30535895
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 May;79(9):3049-58
pubmed: 23455344
Microb Cell Fact. 2018 Feb 22;17(1):30
pubmed: 29471820
mBio. 2020 Sep 22;11(5):
pubmed: 32963004
Proteins. 2017 Sep;85(9):1602-1617
pubmed: 28547780
Acc Chem Res. 2000 Jan;33(1):11-8
pubmed: 10639071
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2001 Dec;5(6):643-9
pubmed: 11738173
Mol Microbiol. 2018 Jan;107(2):249-264
pubmed: 29139580
Carbohydr Polym. 2013 Aug 14;97(1):124-9
pubmed: 23769527
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 2;12(3):e0173187
pubmed: 28253342
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Dec 15;165(Pt A):1529-1539
pubmed: 33058974
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D490-5
pubmed: 24270786