Three vs. Four Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Localized Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Analysis.
bladder cancer
cisplatin-based chemotherapy
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
observational study
radical cystectomy
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
10
01
2021
accepted:
02
03
2021
entrez:
28
5
2021
pubmed:
29
5
2021
medline:
29
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Three or four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard neoadjuvant treatment prior to cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although NCCN guidelines recommend 4 cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine, three cycles are also commonly administered in clinical practice. In this multicenter retrospective study, we assessed a large and homogenous cohort of patients with urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) treated with three or four cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine followed by radical cystectomy, in order to explore whether three vs. four cycles were associated with different outcomes. Patients with histologically confirmed muscle-invasive UBC included in this retrospective study had to be treated with either 3 (cohort A) or 4 (cohort B) cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine as neoadjuvant therapy before undergoing radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy. Outcomes including pathologic downstaging to non-muscle invasive disease, pathologic complete response (defined as absence of disease -ypT0), overall- and cancer-specific- survival as well as time to recurrence were compared between cohorts A vs. B. A total of 219 patients treated at 14 different high-volume Institutions were included in this retrospective study. Patients who received 3 (cohort A) vs. 4 (cohort B) cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine were 160 (73,1%) vs. 59 (26,9%).At univariate analysis, the number of neoadjuvant cycles was not associated with either pathologic complete response, pathologic downstaging, time to recurrence, cancer specific, and overall survival. Of note, patients in cohort B vs. A showed a worse non-cancer specific overall survival at univariate analysis (HR= 2.53; 95 CI= 1.05 - 6.10; p=0.046), although this finding was not confirmed at multivariate analysis. Our findings suggest that 3 cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine may be equally effective, with less long-term toxicity, compared to 4 cycles in the neoadjuvant setting.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Three or four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard neoadjuvant treatment prior to cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although NCCN guidelines recommend 4 cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine, three cycles are also commonly administered in clinical practice. In this multicenter retrospective study, we assessed a large and homogenous cohort of patients with urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) treated with three or four cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine followed by radical cystectomy, in order to explore whether three vs. four cycles were associated with different outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients with histologically confirmed muscle-invasive UBC included in this retrospective study had to be treated with either 3 (cohort A) or 4 (cohort B) cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine as neoadjuvant therapy before undergoing radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy. Outcomes including pathologic downstaging to non-muscle invasive disease, pathologic complete response (defined as absence of disease -ypT0), overall- and cancer-specific- survival as well as time to recurrence were compared between cohorts A vs. B.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 219 patients treated at 14 different high-volume Institutions were included in this retrospective study. Patients who received 3 (cohort A) vs. 4 (cohort B) cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine were 160 (73,1%) vs. 59 (26,9%).At univariate analysis, the number of neoadjuvant cycles was not associated with either pathologic complete response, pathologic downstaging, time to recurrence, cancer specific, and overall survival. Of note, patients in cohort B vs. A showed a worse non-cancer specific overall survival at univariate analysis (HR= 2.53; 95 CI= 1.05 - 6.10; p=0.046), although this finding was not confirmed at multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that 3 cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine may be equally effective, with less long-term toxicity, compared to 4 cycles in the neoadjuvant setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34046347
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.651745
pmc: PMC8144638
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
651745Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Ferro, de Cobelli, Musi, Lucarelli, Terracciano, Pacella, Muto, Porreca, Busetto, Del Giudice, Soria, Gontero, Cantiello, Damiano, Crocerossa, Farhan, Autorino, Vartolomei, Muto, Marchioni, Mari, Scafuri, Minervini, Longo, Chiancone, Perdona, De Placido, Verde, Catellani, Luzzago, Mistretta, Ditonno, Caputo, Battaglia, Zamboni, Antonelli, Greco, Russo, Hurle, Crisan, Manfredi, Porpiglia, Di Lorenzo, Crocetto and Buonerba.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):143-150
pubmed: 30993426
Lancet. 2003 Jun 7;361(9373):1927-34
pubmed: 12801735
Future Oncol. 2010 Sep;6(9):1365-8
pubmed: 20919820
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Mar;18(3):329-354
pubmed: 32135513
Oncologist. 2016 Jun;21(6):708-15
pubmed: 27053504
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104
pubmed: 32360052
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2007 Mar;59(1):67-87
pubmed: 17431372
World J Urol. 2019 Jan;37(1):3-13
pubmed: 30105454
Nat Med. 2020 Dec;26(12):1839-1844
pubmed: 33046870
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2014 Mar;66(1):1-14
pubmed: 24721936
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct;72(5):641-643
pubmed: 32550634
Cancer. 2008 Nov 1;113(9):2471-7
pubmed: 18823036
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1984;162A:11-25
pubmed: 6483905
Oncol Rep. 2012 Feb;27(2):409-15
pubmed: 22052369
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2435-2441
pubmed: 33568346
Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2586-93
pubmed: 25872978
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 01;48(10):934-941
pubmed: 30169681
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):214-221
pubmed: 32868138
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Dec;96(3):534-41
pubmed: 26520458
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):1006-1010
pubmed: 32847746